Claim · model-written summary
SRI gave significantly higher gross energy output, net energy and energy-use efficiency than MSRI in rice.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Treatment
- system of rice intensification (SRI)e1
- Outcome
- gross energy output, net energy, energy-use efficiencye1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- mechanized system of rice intensifica- tion (MSRI)e1
- Setting
- Hyderabad, Telanganae0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during the rainy seasons of 2013 and 2014 at Hyderabad, Telangana, to evaluate the effect of mechanized and conventional system of rice (Oryza sativa L.) intensification”
e1“From the 2 years data, significantly higher gross energy output, net energy, energy-use efficiency, energy productivity and en- ergy intensity were recorded with system of rice intensification (SRI) over mechanized system of rice intensifica- tion (MSRI)”
Title
T.M. SUDHAKARA; A. SRINVAS; R.M. KUMAR; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v62i2.4276
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect SRI gave significantly higher energy productivity and energy intensity than MSRI in rice.
- Intervention effect Irrigation at 3 days after disappearance of pounded water significantly increased energy-use efficiency, energy productivity and energy intensity in rice.
- Intervention effect Irrigation at 3 DADPW gave energy-use efficiency, energy productivity and energy intensity at par with saturation treatment in rice.
- Intervention effect MSRI and SRI performed equally with respect to benefit:cost ratio in rice.
- Intervention effect SRI gave considerably higher gross and net returns than MSRI in rice.
- Intervention effect MSRI gave 2125% higher labour saving than SRI in rice.
- Intervention effect Irrigation at 3 DADPW gave significantly higher net returns and benefit:cost ratio in rice.
- Intervention effect Irrigation at 3 DADPW gave net returns and benefit:cost ratio comparable with saturation treatment in rice.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen application based on LCC gave significantly higher gross returns, net returns and benefit-cost ratio in rice, except the soil test crop response based nitrogen application.