Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Indian Journal of Agronomy 58 (2): 215__219 (June 2013) Research Paper

DIVAKAR DEV; VIVEK; SHEESH PAL SINGH; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Meerut during rabi season 20052006 and 20062007, in a spilt plot de- sign with four replications to find out the effect of weed management and tillage methods on wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Fiori & Paol]. The tillage methods as main-plots treatment comprised of zero tillage, reduced tillage and conventional tillage, whereas weed control practices as sub-plot comprised of five treatments viz. sulfosulforon 25 g/ha, isoproturon 750 g + 2,4-D 250 g/ha, metribuzin 250 g/ha applied at 30 days after sowing, weed free and weedy cheek. The highest yield attributes and yield were noticed under conventional tillage fol- lowed by zero tillage. Minimum weed density and dry matter accumulation was found under zero tillage. Zero till- age was most economical. Among the methods of weed control, sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha gave excellent control of weeds and increased the yield attributes and yield, gross returns, net returns and B: C ratio. Thus zero tillage in combination with application of sulfosulfuron 25g/ha was found effective to manage weeds and increase wheat grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage had the highest yield attributes and yield, followed by zero tillage.

Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
zero tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield attributes and yield were noticed under conventional tillage fol- lowed by zero tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Fiori & Paol]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage had minimum weed density.

Treatment
zero tillagee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
Minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum weed density and dry matter accumulation was found under zero tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Fiori & Paol]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage had minimum weed dry matter accumulation.

Treatment
zero tillagee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
Minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum weed density and dry matter accumulation was found under zero tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Fiori & Paol]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–248 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage was most economical.

Outcome
most economicale0
Direction
moste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zero till- age was most economical.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Fiori & Paol]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha controlled weeds effectively.

Treatment
sulfosulfuron 25 g/hae0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
control of weedse0
Direction
excellente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha gave excellent control of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Fiori & Paol]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha increased yield attributes and yield.

Treatment
sulfosulfuron 25 g/hae0
Outcome
yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha gave excellent control of weeds and increased the yield attributes and yield, gross returns, net returns and B: C ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Fiori & Paol]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha increased gross returns, net returns, and benefit-cost ratio.

Treatment
sulfosulfuron 25 g/hae0
Outcome
gross returns, net returns and B: C ratioe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha gave excellent control of weeds and increased the yield attributes and yield, gross returns, net returns and B: C ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Fiori & Paol]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–248 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend zero tillage with sulfosulfuron 25g/ha for weed management and wheat grain yield.

Treatment
zero tillage in combination with application of sulfosulfuron 25g/hae0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
manage weeds and increase wheat grain yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zero tillage in combination with application of sulfosulfuron 25g/ha was found effective to manage weeds and increase wheat grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1119 · show in text ↑

tillage · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

183 papers: 126 positive, 57 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

179 papers more in this group

See all 183 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.