Paper · 2006 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Effect of Tillage and Herbicides on Weeds and Wheat in Transplanted Rice-Wheat System

Namrata Jain; M. L. Kewat; J. S. Mishra; et al.

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Different tillage practices did not influence the population and dry maller of weeds and yield of wheat. Infestation of weeds caused 65% reduction in wheal grain yield. Post-emergence application of clodinafop at 0.06 kg ha−1 fb 2, 4-D at 0.50 kg ha−1 significantly reduced the population and dry matter of weeds and increased the grain yield of wheat. This combination proved more effcctive than isoproturon at 1.0 kg ha−1 + 2, 4-D at 0.50 kg ha−1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage practices did not influence weed population or dry matter.

Treatment
Different tillage practicese0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
population and dry maller of weedse0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different tillage practices did not influence the population and dry maller of weeds and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage practices did not influence wheat yield.

Treatment
Different tillage practicese0
Outcome
yield of wheate0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different tillage practices did not influence the population and dry maller of weeds and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–103 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed infestation reduced wheat grain yield by 65%.

Taxon
wheale0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
65%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Infestation of weeds caused 65% reduction in wheal grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop plus 2, 4-D reduced weed population and dry matter.

Treatment
clodinafop at 0.06 kg ha−1 fb 2, 4-D at 0.50 kg ha−1e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
population and dry matter of weedse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Post-emergence application of clodinafop at 0.06 kg ha−1 fb 2, 4-D at 0.50 kg ha−1 significantly reduced the population and dry matter of weeds and increased the grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop plus 2, 4-D increased wheat grain yield.

Treatment
clodinafop at 0.06 kg ha−1 fb 2, 4-D at 0.50 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Post-emergence application of clodinafop at 0.06 kg ha−1 fb 2, 4-D at 0.50 kg ha−1 significantly reduced the population and dry matter of weeds and increased the grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–351 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The clodinafop combination was more effective than isoproturon plus 2, 4-D.

Outcome
more effcctivee0
Direction
more effcctivee0
Comparator
isoproturon at 1.0 kg ha−1 + 2, 4-D at 0.50 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“This combination proved more effcctive than isoproturon at 1.0 kg ha−1 + 2, 4-D at 0.50 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–448 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

clodinafop · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 57 positive, 3 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

clodinafop · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 54 positive, 7 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

2,4-D · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 64 positive, 2 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

tillage · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

183 papers: 126 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 126 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

179 papers more in this group

See all 183 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

297 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.