Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Productivity and economics of sugarcane (Saccharum officinanrm) based production systems in subtropical India

S.K. SHUKLA; MENHl LAL

13
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow, during 1996 98 and 1998 2000 with 3 cropping systems, viz. wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori Paol.) sugarcane (Saccha rum officinarum L.), sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) sugarcane and sunflower sugarcane, and 3 planting ma terials for sugarcane (conventional 3 bud setts setts obtained from 750 ppm a.i. ethephon sprayed solution in seed cane 10 days before planting and polythene bag raised settlings PBS). The highest number of millable canes (158,70Olha), cane yield (116.9 tonneslha) and cane equivalent yield (145.9 tonneslha) were obtained when sugarcane (ethephon sprayed) was planted with spring sunflower. Sugarcane intercropping with sunflower increased 41.43% cane yield (1 11 tonneslha) over sunflower sugarcane system. Sunflower t sugarcane (CP) system produced taller cane (214 cm) than other systems. Use of polythene bag raised settlings increased the cane yield by 17% in wheat sugarcane system. The variation in cane yield was observed due to variation in date \ of planting under different systems. Sugarcane sunflower (ethephon sprayed) system also produced the highest number of millable canes (1 59,000) and cane yield (72.9 tonneslha) in subsequent ratoon. Sugarcane (ethephon sprayed) sunflower system fetched highest net return (Rs 78,000lha) and benefit :cost ratio (3.27). However, for .late planting conditions in wheat cane system the use of polythene bag raised settlings was found quite remu nerative (Rs 69,596lha net return and benefit : cost ratio 3.16)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon sprayed sugarcane with spring sunflower gave the highest number of millable canes.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
sugarcane (ethephon sprayed) was planted with spring sunflowere0
Outcome
number of millable canese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
158,70Olhae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number of millable canes (158,70Olha), cane yield (116.9 tonneslha) and cane equivalent yield (145.9 tonneslha) were obtained when sugarcane (ethephon sprayed) was planted with spring sunflower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon sprayed sugarcane with spring sunflower gave the highest cane yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
sugarcane (ethephon sprayed) was planted with spring sunflowere0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
116.9 tonneslhae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number of millable canes (158,70Olha), cane yield (116.9 tonneslha) and cane equivalent yield (145.9 tonneslha) were obtained when sugarcane (ethephon sprayed) was planted with spring sunflower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon sprayed sugarcane with spring sunflower gave the highest cane equivalent yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
sugarcane (ethephon sprayed) was planted with spring sunflowere0
Outcome
cane equivalent yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
145.9 tonneslhae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number of millable canes (158,70Olha), cane yield (116.9 tonneslha) and cane equivalent yield (145.9 tonneslha) were obtained when sugarcane (ethephon sprayed) was planted with spring sunflower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane intercropping with sunflower increased cane yield by 41.43% over the sunflower sugarcane system.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Treatment
Sugarcane intercropping with sunflowere0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
41.43%e0
Comparator
sunflower sugarcane systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane intercropping with sunflower increased 41.43% cane yield (1 11 tonneslha) over sunflower sugarcane system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sunflower sugarcane CP system produced taller cane than other systems.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Sunflower t sugarcane (CP) systeme0
Outcome
canee0
Direction
tallere0
Value
214 cme0
Comparator
other systemse0

Verbatim

e0

“Sunflower t sugarcane (CP) system produced taller cane (214 cm) than other systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–913 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polythene bag raised settlings increased cane yield by 17% in the wheat sugarcane system.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
polythene bag raised settlingse0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Use of polythene bag raised settlings increased the cane yield by 17% in wheat sugarcane system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1010 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane yield variation was attributed to planting date across systems.

Taxon
canee0
Treatment
date \ of plantinge0
Outcome
variation in cane yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The variation in cane yield was observed due to variation in date \ of planting under different systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ethephon sprayed sugarcane sunflower system produced the highest ratoon number of millable canes.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Treatment
Sugarcane sunflower (ethephon sprayed) systeme0
Outcome
number of millable canese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1 59,000e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane sunflower (ethephon sprayed) system also produced the highest number of millable canes (1 59,000) and cane yield (72.9 tonneslha) in subsequent ratoon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ethephon sprayed sugarcane sunflower system produced the highest ratoon cane yield.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Treatment
Sugarcane sunflower (ethephon sprayed) systeme0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
72.9 tonneslhae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane sunflower (ethephon sprayed) system also produced the highest number of millable canes (1 59,000) and cane yield (72.9 tonneslha) in subsequent ratoon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ethephon sprayed sugarcane sunflower system had the highest net return.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Treatment
Sugarcane (ethephon sprayed) sunflower systeme0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs 78,000lhae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane (ethephon sprayed) sunflower system fetched highest net return (Rs 78,000lha) and benefit :cost ratio (3.27).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ethephon sprayed sugarcane sunflower system had the highest benefit :cost ratio.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Treatment
Sugarcane (ethephon sprayed) sunflower systeme0
Outcome
benefit :cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.27e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane (ethephon sprayed) sunflower system fetched highest net return (Rs 78,000lha) and benefit :cost ratio (3.27).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1397 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polythene bag raised settlings were remunerative for late planted wheat cane, with net return of Rs 69,596lha.

Taxon
canee0
Treatment
polythene bag raised settlingse0
Outcome
net returne0
Value
Rs 69,596lhae0

Verbatim

e0

“However, for .late planting conditions in wheat cane system the use of polythene bag raised settlings was found quite remu nerative (Rs 69,596lha net return and benefit : cost ratio 3.16)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1585 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polythene bag raised settlings were remunerative for late planted wheat cane, with benefit : cost ratio of 3.16.

Taxon
canee0
Treatment
polythene bag raised settlingse0
Outcome
benefit : cost ratioe0
Value
3.16e0

Verbatim

e0

“However, for .late planting conditions in wheat cane system the use of polythene bag raised settlings was found quite remu nerative (Rs 69,596lha net return and benefit : cost ratio 3.16)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1585 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

poly(ethylene) · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

88 papers: 67 positive, 21 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

application · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 65 positive, 7 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.