Paper · 2023 · Middle East Journal of Applied Sciences

Effect of Planting Methods and Seeding Rates on Yield and Yield Components of New Forage Sorghum Hybrid (Sakha 20)

T El-Gaafarey; Walaa Mousa; Shereen El-Nahrawy; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

At the Kafer El Shiekh Governorate of the Agricultural Research Center in Egypt, a field experiment has been performed.To determine the best planting techniques and seeding rate for the growth characteristics and forage yield of a new sorghum hybrid (Sakha 20) through the summers of 2019 and 2020.Two planting methods have been followed (broadcasting on the top of the rows, hills on the top of the rows) with three rates of seeding (15, 20 and 25 kg fed -1 ).The outcomes indicated that planting in hills on the top of rows showed the highest significant increase in plant height, tiller number m -2 , diameter of stem (cm), dry matter %, fresh leaf to stem ratio, dry leaf to stem ratio, and total yield of fresh and dry forage (ton fed -1 ) as compared with the other method of planting.In two successive seasons, increasing seed rates from 15 to 25 kg fed -1 resulted in a significant gradual increase in plant height and tiller number m -2 , as well as total fresh and dry forage yield (ton fed -1 ).Therefore, 25 kg fed -1 provided the greatest values of the above-mentioned characters.Diameter of stem (cm), dry matter %, and fresh and dry leaf / stem ratio percent significantly decreased in the two consecutive seasons as seed rates were increased from 15 to 25 kg fed -1 .The interplay between planting methods and seeding rates had a significant impact on plant height, tiller number m -2 , and total yield of fresh and dry forage (ton fed -1 ).The height values were obtained by the interaction between the planting method in hills on top of rows with the rate of seeding at 25 kg fed -1 .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hill planting increased plant height, tiller number, stem diameter, dry matter, and leaf to stem ratios relative to broadcasting.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
planting in hills on the top of rowse0
Outcome
plant height, tiller number m -2 , diameter of stem (cm)e0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“planting in hills on the top of rows showed the highest significant increase in plant height, tiller number m -2 , diameter of stem (cm), dry matter %, fresh leaf to stem ratio, dry leaf to stem ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hill planting increased total fresh and dry forage yield relative to the other planting method.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Outcome
total yield of fresh and dry foragee0
Comparator
the other method of plantinge0

Not reportedTreatmentDirection

Verbatim

e0

“total yield of fresh and dry forage (ton fed -1 ) as compared with the other method of planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing seed rates from 15 to 25 kg fed -1 increased plant height and tiller number.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
increasing seed rates from 15 to 25 kg fed -1e0
Outcome
plant height and tiller number m -2e0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increasing seed rates from 15 to 25 kg fed -1 resulted in a significant gradual increase in plant height and tiller number m -2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing seed rates increased total fresh and dry forage yield.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
25 kg fed -1e0
Outcome
total fresh and dry forage yielde0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“total fresh and dry forage yield (ton fed -1 ).Therefore, 25 kg fed -1 provided the greatest values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing seed rates decreased stem diameter, dry matter, and fresh and dry leaf to stem ratios.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
seed rates were increased from 15 to 25 kg fed -1e0
Outcome
Diameter of stem (cm), dry matter %e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Diameter of stem (cm), dry matter %, and fresh and dry leaf / stem ratio percent significantly decreased in the two consecutive seasons as seed rates were increased from 15 to 25 kg fed -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting method and seeding rate interacted significantly for plant height and tiller number.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
planting methods and seeding ratese0
Outcome
plant height, tiller number m -2e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The interplay between planting methods and seeding rates had a significant impact on plant height, tiller number m -2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1400 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting method and seeding rate interacted significantly for total fresh and dry forage yield.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
planting methods and seeding ratese0
Outcome
total yield of fresh and dry foragee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The interplay between planting methods and seeding rates had a significant impact on plant height, tiller number m -2 , and total yield of fresh and dry forage (ton fed -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1456 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hills on rows with 25 kg fed -1 gave the reported height values.

Taxon
forage sorghumt0
Treatment
planting method in hills on top of rows with the rate of seeding at 25 kg fed -1e0
Outcome
height valuese0

Verbatim

e0

“The height values were obtained by the interaction between the planting method in hills on top of rows with the rate of seeding at 25 kg fed -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1600 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑

density · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

34 papers: 22 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

density · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

98 papers: 83 positive, 15 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.