Paper · 2023 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

The role of supplemental lighting during late fall and winter on photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic pigments biosynthesis of cut rose flower ( Rosa hybrida cv. ‘Dolce Vita’)

Alireza Khaleghi; Ali Khadivi; Morteza Akramian; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Low levels of natural light within the late fall and winter periods are main restricting factors for greenhouse-cut rose flower production in northern countries. Here, the effects of supplemental lighting on photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic pigments and the morphological response of cut rose flower cv. ‘Dolce Vita’ were investigated. Four different supplemental lighting regimes, including 85, 170, 255, and 340 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD using a high-pressure sodium lamp for a six-hour day extension started at sunset were applied to rose plants during late fall and winter. With increasing light intensity to 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD, the content of chlorophyll a, total chlorophyll, carotenoid content, and the ratio of chlorophylls a/b as well as amount of anthocyanins greatly improved. The highest phenol content and total antioxidant capacity was observed in 170 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD. Moreover, extending of daylength by light intensity of 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD had a significant affirmative effect on traits of growth, including flower stem length (P < 0.01), leaf number (P < 0.05), renewal bud formation (P < 0.05), time of harvesting (P < 0.05), and vase life of cut flowers (P < 0.01). Considering physiological and morphological improvement, extending of daylength from 10-h to 16-h by supplemental light of 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD would be the best choice to cultivate cut rose flower cv. ‘Dolce Vita’.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing light intensity to 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD greatly improved chlorophyll a, total chlorophyll and carotenoid content in cut roses.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
increasing light intensity to 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFDe0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, total chlorophyll, carotenoid contente0
Direction
greatly improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cut rose flower ( Rosa hybrida cv. ‘Dolce Vita’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–176 · show in text ↑
e0

“With increasing light intensity to 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD, the content of chlorophyll a, total chlorophyll, carotenoid content, and the ratio of chlorophylls a/b as well as amount of anthocyanins greatly improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing light intensity to 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD greatly improved the ratio of chlorophylls a/b and anthocyanin amount in cut roses.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
increasing light intensity to 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFDe0
Outcome
ratio of chlorophylls a/b as well as amount of anthocyaninse0
Direction
greatly improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cut rose flower ( Rosa hybrida cv. ‘Dolce Vita’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–176 · show in text ↑
e0

“With increasing light intensity to 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD, the content of chlorophyll a, total chlorophyll, carotenoid content, and the ratio of chlorophylls a/b as well as amount of anthocyanins greatly improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 170 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD treatment gave the highest phenol content and total antioxidant capacity in cut roses.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
170 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFDe1
Outcome
phenol content and total antioxidant capacitye1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cut rose flower ( Rosa hybrida cv. ‘Dolce Vita’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–176 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest phenol content and total antioxidant capacity was observed in 170 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extending daylength with 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD light increased flower stem length of cut roses.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
extending of daylength by light intensity of 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFDe2
Outcome
flower stem lengthe2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Qualifier
P < 0.01e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cut rose flower ( Rosa hybrida cv. ‘Dolce Vita’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–176 · show in text ↑
e2

“extending of daylength by light intensity of 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD had a significant affirmative effect on traits of growth, including flower stem length (P < 0.01), leaf number (P < 0.05), renewal bud formation (P < 0.05), time of harvesting (P < 0.05), and vase life of cut flowers (P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extending daylength with 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD light increased leaf number of cut roses.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
extending of daylength by light intensity of 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFDe2
Outcome
leaf numbere2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Qualifier
P < 0.05e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cut rose flower ( Rosa hybrida cv. ‘Dolce Vita’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–176 · show in text ↑
e2

“extending of daylength by light intensity of 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD had a significant affirmative effect on traits of growth, including flower stem length (P < 0.01), leaf number (P < 0.05), renewal bud formation (P < 0.05), time of harvesting (P < 0.05), and vase life of cut flowers (P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extending daylength with 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD light increased renewal bud formation of cut roses.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
extending of daylength by light intensity of 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFDe2
Outcome
renewal bud formatione2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Qualifier
P < 0.05e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cut rose flower ( Rosa hybrida cv. ‘Dolce Vita’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–176 · show in text ↑
e2

“extending of daylength by light intensity of 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD had a significant affirmative effect on traits of growth, including flower stem length (P < 0.01), leaf number (P < 0.05), renewal bud formation (P < 0.05), time of harvesting (P < 0.05), and vase life of cut flowers (P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extending daylength with 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD light increased the time of harvesting of cut roses.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
extending of daylength by light intensity of 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFDe2
Outcome
time of harvestinge2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Qualifier
P < 0.05e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cut rose flower ( Rosa hybrida cv. ‘Dolce Vita’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–176 · show in text ↑
e2

“extending of daylength by light intensity of 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD had a significant affirmative effect on traits of growth, including flower stem length (P < 0.01), leaf number (P < 0.05), renewal bud formation (P < 0.05), time of harvesting (P < 0.05), and vase life of cut flowers (P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extending daylength with 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD light increased vase life of cut roses.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
extending of daylength by light intensity of 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFDe2
Outcome
vase life of cut flowerse2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Qualifier
P < 0.01e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cut rose flower ( Rosa hybrida cv. ‘Dolce Vita’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–176 · show in text ↑
e2

“extending of daylength by light intensity of 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD had a significant affirmative effect on traits of growth, including flower stem length (P < 0.01), leaf number (P < 0.05), renewal bud formation (P < 0.05), time of harvesting (P < 0.05), and vase life of cut flowers (P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1189 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend extending daylength from 10 h to 16 h with 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD supplemental light to cultivate cut roses.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Outcome
extending of daylength from 10-h to 16-he3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cut rose flower ( Rosa hybrida cv. ‘Dolce Vita’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–176 · show in text ↑
e3

“extending of daylength from 10-h to 16-h by supplemental light of 255 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD would be the best choice to cultivate cut rose flower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1389 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: pigments · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
    Far-red light increased Meijikatar leaf chlorosis versus red light and controls.

    Influence of End-of-day Red and Far-red Light on Potted Roses · 1991 · compared with end-of-day red light or those which served as controls

    Opposite direction

  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

light · quality: postharvest · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

light · growth · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

light · quality: phytochemicals · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.