Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Quality and productivity of promising sugarcane (Saccharum offcinarum) genotypes under various planting seasons and nitrogen levels in subtropical India

M.B PANDEY; S.K. SHUKLA

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 199597 and 1996-98 to study the effect of different genotypes (CoS 90269, CoPant 90223 and CoS 86218) of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) with various planting seasons (autumn, spring and summer) and nitrogen levels (1 12.5, 150 and 187.5 kg Nlha) on cane quality, productivity and economics of sugarcane production system. Genotype CoPant 90223 gave the highest commercial cane sugar equivalent yield (12.2 .. and 12.8 tonnestha in December and February respectively), cane equivalent yield (100.68 tonnestha), net returns (Rs 48,068tha) and benefit : cost (1.8). Intercropping of Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. & Cosson] with autumn sugarcane was found advantageous over sole cane planting and resulted maximum cane-equivalent yield (94.0 tonnestha), CCS equivalent (1 1.9 tonnesl ha) and net return (Rs 38,262lha). Increasing nitrogen levels during both the seasons increased cane yield and net return.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CoPant 90223 produced the highest commercial cane sugar equivalent yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
CoPant 90223e1
Outcome
commercial cane sugar equivalent yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
12.2 .. and 12.8 tonnesthae1

Verbatim

e0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“Genotype CoPant 90223 gave the highest commercial cane sugar equivalent yield (12.2 .. and 12.8 tonnestha in December and February respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–512 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CoPant 90223 produced the highest cane equivalent yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
CoPant 90223e2
Outcome
cane equivalent yielde1
Direction
higheste2
Value
100.68 tonnesthae1

Verbatim

e0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“cane equivalent yield (100.68 tonnestha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–554 · show in text ↑
e2

“Genotype CoPant 90223 gave the highest commercial cane sugar equivalent yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–445 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CoPant 90223 produced the highest net returns.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
CoPant 90223e2
Outcome
net returnse1
Direction
higheste2
Value
Rs 48,068thae1

Verbatim

e0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“net returns (Rs 48,068tha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–582 · show in text ↑
e2

“Genotype CoPant 90223 gave the highest commercial cane sugar equivalent yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–445 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CoPant 90223 had the highest benefit-cost ratio.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
CoPant 90223e2
Outcome
benefit : coste1
Direction
higheste2
Value
1.8e1

Verbatim

e0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“benefit : cost (1.8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–607 · show in text ↑
e2

“Genotype CoPant 90223 gave the highest commercial cane sugar equivalent yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–445 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mustard intercropping with autumn sugarcane maximized cane equivalent yield relative to sole cane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Intercropping of Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. & Cosson] with autumn sugarcanee0
Interactor
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0other
Outcome
cane-equivalent yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
94.0 tonnesthae0
Comparator
sole cane plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · InteractorDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping of Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. & Cosson] with autumn sugarcane was found advantageous over sole cane planting and resulted maximum cane-equivalent yield (94.0 tonnestha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–809 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mustard intercropping maximized CCS equivalent relative to sole cane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Intercropping of Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. & Cosson] with autumn sugarcanee0
Interactor
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0other
Outcome
CCS equivalente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1 1.9 tonnesl hae0
Comparator
sole cane plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · InteractorDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping of Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. & Cosson] with autumn sugarcane was found advantageous over sole cane planting and resulted maximum cane-equivalent yield (94.0 tonnestha), CCS equivalent (1 1.9 tonnesl ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mustard intercropping maximized net returns relative to sole cane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Intercropping of Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. & Cosson] with autumn sugarcanee0
Interactor
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0other
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs 38,262lhae0
Comparator
sole cane plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · InteractorDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping of Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. & Cosson] with autumn sugarcane was found advantageous over sole cane planting and resulted maximum cane-equivalent yield (94.0 tonnestha), CCS equivalent (1 1.9 tonnesl ha) and net return (Rs 38,262lha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen increased cane yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
Increasing nitrogen levelse0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing nitrogen levels during both the seasons increased cane yield and net return.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–963 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen increased net returns.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
Increasing nitrogen levelse0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing nitrogen levels during both the seasons increased cane yield and net return.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–963 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–181 · show in text ↑

Brassica juncea · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

88 papers: 67 positive, 21 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.