Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Weed management in fenugreek (TrigoneEla foenum-graecum)

G. R. CHAUDHARY

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during winter seasons of 1991-94 at Jobner, to study the effect of weed management on fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.). The weed free treatment recorded the lowest weed dry weight and the highest weed control efficiency at all the stages of observation. Among rest of the treatments, the lowest weed dry weight and the highest weed control efficiency was obtained at 25 DAS with pre-plant incorporation of fluchloralin (1.25 kg/ha) at 50 DAS with pre-emergence application of pendimethalin (1.5 kg/ha) and at 75 DAS and at harvest with pre-emergence application of pendimethalin (1.0 kgtha) supplemented with hand weeding once (50 DAS). All the weed control measures - significantly increased mean number of branches and podstplant (except metolachlor @ 1.0 kg/ha) and seed yield (except metolachlor @ 0.5 and 1.0 kg/ha) was obtained under weed free condition, whereas maximum meanseed yield of 16.1 5 qtha and net return of Rs 14,304Iha with benefit : cost ratio of 3.79 were obtained with fluchloralin @ 0.75 kg/ha supplemented with hand weeding once, closely followed by hand weeding twice, weed free and oxyfluorfen @ 0.15 kg/ha supplemented with hand weeding once.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment had the lowest weed dry weight and highest weed-control efficiency at all stages.

Treatment
weed free treatmente0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed dry weight and the highest weed control efficiencye0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The weed free treatment recorded the lowest weed dry weight and the highest weed control efficiency at all the stages of observation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–288 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25 DAS fluchloralin incorporation gave the lowest weed dry weight and highest control efficiency among other treatments.

Treatment
pre-plant incorporation of fluchloralin (1.25 kg/ha)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed dry weight and the highest weed control efficiencye0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
at 25 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest weed dry weight and the highest weed control efficiency was obtained at 25 DAS with pre-plant incorporation of fluchloralin (1.25 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–467 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 50 DAS pendimethalin at 1.5 kg/ha gave the lowest weed dry weight and highest control efficiency.

Treatment
pre-emergence application of pendimethalin (1.5 kg/ha)e0
Qualifier
at 50 DASe0

Not reportedInteractorInteractor roleComparatorOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 50 DAS with pre-emergence application of pendimethalin (1.5 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–537 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 75 DAS and harvest, pendimethalin plus hand weeding gave the lowest weed dry weight and highest efficiency.

Treatment
pre-emergence application of pendimethalin (1.0 kgtha) supplemented with hand weeding once (50 DAS)e0

Not reportedInteractorInteractor roleComparatorOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 75 DAS and at harvest with pre-emergence application of pendimethalin (1.0 kgtha) supplemented with hand weeding once (50 DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most weed control measures significantly increased branch and pod numbers, except metolachlor at 1.0 kg/ha.

Treatment
weed control measurese0
Outcome
mean number of branches and podstplante0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
except metolachlor @ 1.0 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the weed control measures - significantly increased mean number of branches and podstplant (except metolachlor @ 1.0 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most weed control measures increased seed yield, except metolachlor at 0.5 and 1.0 kg/ha.

Treatment
weed free conditione0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Qualifier
except metolachlor @ 0.5 and 1.0 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield (except metolachlor @ 0.5 and 1.0 kg/ha) was obtained under weed free condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluchloralin plus one hand weeding achieved maximum mean seed yield of 16.1 5 qtha.

Treatment
fluchloralin @ 0.75 kg/ha supplemented with hand weeding oncee0
Outcome
meanseed yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
16.1 5 qthae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum meanseed yield of 16.1 5 qtha and net return of Rs 14,304Iha with benefit : cost ratio of 3.79 were obtained with fluchloralin @ 0.75 kg/ha supplemented with hand weeding once”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1088 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluchloralin plus hand weeding yielded a net return of Rs 14,304Iha.

Treatment
fluchloralin @ 0.75 kg/ha supplemented with hand weeding oncee0
Outcome
net returne0
Value
Rs 14,304Ihae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net return of Rs 14,304Iha with benefit : cost ratio of 3.79 were obtained with fluchloralin @ 0.75 kg/ha supplemented with hand weeding once”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1088 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluchloralin plus hand weeding yielded a benefit-cost ratio of 3.79.

Treatment
fluchloralin @ 0.75 kg/ha supplemented with hand weeding oncee0
Outcome
benefit : cost ratioe0
Value
3.79e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“benefit : cost ratio of 3.79 were obtained with fluchloralin @ 0.75 kg/ha supplemented with hand weeding once”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1088 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑

Fluchloralin · yield · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · yield · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

herbicide · weed · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.