Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of post-monsoon irrigation, Rhizobium inoculation and nitrogen on yield and yield attributes of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajar)

J. R. PATEL; Z. G. PATEL

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 1989 and 1990 to study the effect of post-n~onsoon irrigation, Rhizobium inoculation and nitrogen on yield and yield attributes of BDN 2 pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan 6.) Millsp.] in Vertisol of south Gujarat. Irrigation treatments except control did not differ significantly for their effect on grain yield but gave significantly higher grain yield over no irrigation (control). Among the irrigated treatments, irrigation water : cumulative pan evaporation (IW : CPE) ratio of 0.25 showed its superiority to the others and recorded the higher grain yield of 17.39 qtha. The seed treatment with Rhizobium did not exert its significant effect on seed yield, while the application of nitrogen @ 20 kgha -gave significantly highest (18.32 qha) grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigated treatments did not differ significantly in grain yield.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not differe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation treatments except control did not differ significantly for their effect on grain yield but gave significantly higher grain yield over no irrigation (control).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–414 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased grain yield over no irrigation.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no irrigation (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation treatments except control did not differ significantly for their effect on grain yield but gave significantly higher grain yield over no irrigation (control).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–414 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IW:CPE ratio 0.25 produced the highest irrigated-treatment grain yield, 17.39 qtha.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
irrigation water : cumulative pan evaporation (IW : CPE) ratio of 0.25e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
17.39 qthae0
Comparator
the otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the irrigated treatments, irrigation water : cumulative pan evaporation (IW : CPE) ratio of 0.25 showed its superiority to the others and recorded the higher grain yield of 17.39 qtha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–605 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium seed treatment did not significantly affect seed yield.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
seed treatment with Rhizobiume0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
did not exerte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seed treatment with Rhizobium did not exert its significant effect on seed yield, while the application of nitrogen @ 20 kgha -gave significantly highest (18.32 qha) grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 20 kgha gave the highest grain yield, 18.32 qha.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
nitrogen @ 20 kghae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
18.32 qhae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seed treatment with Rhizobium did not exert its significant effect on seed yield, while the application of nitrogen @ 20 kgha -gave significantly highest (18.32 qha) grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–112 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

32 papers: 30 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 32 positive, 5 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

51 papers: 51 positive, 0 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.