Abstract
The present research was conducted in the research farm of Takhar University, Afghanistan. The study was carried out in 2021, to document the Effect of Nitrogen and Plant spacing on the Growth and Yield of Onion and it is one of the essential bulbous vegetables. The experiment was laid out in Split Plot Design having three replications were used. Four different doses of nitrogenous fertilizer namely 0, 100, 125, and 150 kg/ha were applied. The treatments also included three levels of spacing (S) viz., S1= 7.5 cm × 15 cm, S2= 10 cm × 15 cm, and S3= 12.5 cm × 15 cm. These treatments were implemented using a split-plot design. As a result, the spacing had a significant effect on biomass and marketable yields, and the spacing of 7.5 cm×15 cm resulted in the maximum marketable yield of 31.24 t/ha likely due to a higher plant population. Various nitrogen doses as well as affected plant characteristics and yield. The maximum biomass yield of 62.52 t/ha was recorded with 150 kg nitrogen/ha. Whereas the highest marketable yield 38.62 t/ha was observed with 125 kg nitrogen/ha. In conclusion, spacing and different nitrogen concentrations had significant impacts on plant characteristics and yield. These findings highlight the importance of enhancing spacing and nitrogen doses to maximize crop yields.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Plant spacing significantly affected onion biomass yield.
- Taxon
- ONION
Allium cepat0 - Treatment
- spacinge0
- Outcome
- biomasse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the spacing had a significant effect on biomass and marketable yields”
t0“ONION”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant spacing significantly affected onion marketable yield.
- Taxon
- ONIONAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- spacinge0
- Outcome
- marketable yieldse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the spacing had a significant effect on biomass and marketable yields”
t0“ONION”
Claim · model-written summary
Spacing of 7.5 cm×15 cm gave the maximum onion marketable yield of 31.24 t/ha.
- Taxon
- ONIONAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- spacing of 7.5 cm×15 cme0
- Outcome
- marketable yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 31.24 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the spacing of 7.5 cm×15 cm resulted in the maximum marketable yield of 31.24 t/ha”
t0“ONION”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen at 150 kg/ha produced the maximum onion biomass yield of 62.52 t/ha.
- Taxon
- ONIONAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- 150 kg nitrogen/hae0
- Outcome
- biomass yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 62.52 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum biomass yield of 62.52 t/ha was recorded with 150 kg nitrogen/ha.”
t0“ONION”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen at 125 kg/ha produced the highest onion marketable yield of 38.62 t/ha.
- Taxon
- ONIONAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- 125 kg nitrogen/hae0
- Outcome
- marketable yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 38.62 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest marketable yield 38.62 t/ha was observed with 125 kg nitrogen/ha.”
t0“ONION”
The same questions in other papers
density · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →nitrogen · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
156 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
180 papers more in this group
See all 184 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.