Abstract
This study was conducted to study the interaction effect of different rate of nitrogen fertilizer and plant spacing on yield and yield components of shallot under Jimma condition, in the experimental field of College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Jimma University. Local variety of shallot was used with the three level of nitrogen (0, 100 and 150 kg haG 1 ) and three intra-row spacing (10, 15 and 20 cm). The result of this field experiment indicated that, the interaction effect of 150 kg haG 1 and 20 cm spacing resulted highly significant plant height (30.33 cm) (p<0.05). Nitrogen levels significantly affected the number of leaves per plant of shallot with the highest value (27.84 cm) obtained from 100 kg N haG 1 , so, statistically significant (p<0.05). There was no significant effect of interaction between nitrogen and intra-row spacing on leave number of shallot. Significantly largest stem diameter 0.63 cm (p<0.50) was obtained from intra-row spacing of 20 cm. But there was no interaction effect of nitrogen and spacing on the stem diameter of shallot. There was no interaction effect of nitrogen fertilizer and spacing on the bulb diameter of shallot. No significant difference was obtained with the interaction effect of nitrogen and spacing on shallot bulb weight. An increased N dose to 100 kg haG 1 resulted in the increased yield of shallot bulbs to 30.2 t haG 1 which was significantly different from 0 and 150 kg haG 1 (p<0.05). From this finding, the highest growth performance of plant which leads to increased yield could be using 150 kg haG 1 and spacing of 20 cm. However, the conclusive recommendation should be based on the results of repeated experiments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
The combination of 150 kg haG 1 nitrogen and 20 cm spacing produced plant height of 30.33 cm.
- Taxon
- Shallot
Allium cepa var. aggregatumt0 - Treatment
- 150 kg haG 1 and 20 cm spacinge0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- highly significante0
- Value
- 30.33 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the interaction effect of 150 kg haG 1 and 20 cm spacing resulted highly significant plant height (30.33 cm) (p<0.05)”
t0“Shallot (Allium ascalonium L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
At 100 kg N haG 1, shallot had the highest reported leaf number, 27.84 cm as printed.
- Taxon
- shallotAllium cepa var. aggregatumt0
- Treatment
- 100 kg N haG 1e0
- Outcome
- number of leaves per plante0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 27.84 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nitrogen levels significantly affected the number of leaves per plant of shallot with the highest value (27.84 cm) obtained from 100 kg N haG 1 , so, statistically significant (p<0.05)”
t0“Shallot (Allium ascalonium L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The nitrogen by spacing interaction was not significant for leaf number.
- Taxon
- shallotAllium cepa var. aggregatumt0
- Treatment
- interaction between nitrogen and intra-row spacinge0
- Outcome
- leave numbere0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was no significant effect of interaction between nitrogen and intra-row spacing on leave number of shallot”
t0“Shallot (Allium ascalonium L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Stem diameter was largest at 20 cm intra-row spacing, at 0.63 cm.
- Taxon
- ShallotAllium cepa var. aggregatumt0
- Treatment
- intra-row spacing of 20 cme0
- Outcome
- stem diametere0
- Direction
- largeste0
- Value
- 0.63 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significantly largest stem diameter 0.63 cm (p<0.50) was obtained from intra-row spacing of 20 cm”
t0“Shallot (Allium ascalonium L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The nitrogen by spacing interaction did not significantly affect stem diameter.
- Taxon
- shallotAllium cepa var. aggregatumt0
- Treatment
- interaction effect of nitrogen and spacinge0
- Outcome
- stem diametere0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there was no interaction effect of nitrogen and spacing on the stem diameter of shallot”
t0“Shallot (Allium ascalonium L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The nitrogen by spacing interaction did not significantly affect bulb diameter.
- Taxon
- shallotAllium cepa var. aggregatumt0
- Treatment
- interaction effect of nitrogen fertilizer and spacinge0
- Outcome
- bulb diametere0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was no interaction effect of nitrogen fertilizer and spacing on the bulb diameter of shallot”
t0“Shallot (Allium ascalonium L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The nitrogen by spacing interaction did not significantly affect shallot bulb weight.
- Taxon
- shallotAllium cepa var. aggregatumt0
- Treatment
- interaction effect of nitrogen and spacinge0
- Outcome
- shallot bulb weighte0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No significant difference was obtained with the interaction effect of nitrogen and spacing on shallot bulb weight”
t0“Shallot (Allium ascalonium L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
A 100 kg haG 1 nitrogen dose raised shallot bulb yield to 30.2 t haG 1 versus 0 and 150 kg haG 1.
- Taxon
- shallotAllium cepa var. aggregatumt0
- Treatment
- 100 kg haG 1e0
- Outcome
- yield of shallot bulbse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 30.2 t haG 1e0
- Comparator
- 0 and 150 kg haG 1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“An increased N dose to 100 kg haG 1 resulted in the increased yield of shallot bulbs to 30.2 t haG 1 which was significantly different from 0 and 150 kg haG 1 (p<0.05)”
t0“Shallot (Allium ascalonium L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest 150 kg haG 1 nitrogen and 20 cm spacing for the highest growth performance and increased yield, subject to replication.
- Taxon
- ShallotAllium cepa var. aggregatumt0
- Treatment
- 150 kg haG 1 and spacing of 20 cme0
- Outcome
- highest growth performance of plant which leads to increased yielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest growth performance of plant which leads to increased yield could be using 150 kg haG 1 and spacing of 20 cm”
t0“Shallot (Allium ascalonium L.)”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
77 papers more in this group
See all 81 papers →density · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →density · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →nitrogen · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 157 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
180 papers more in this group
See all 184 papers →fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 464 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
526 papers more in this group
See all 530 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.