Paper · 2024 · Journal of Scientific Research and Reports

Economics of Production Enhancement of Lentil (Lens culinaris L.) through Micronutrient and Bio-inoculants in Central Plains of U. P.

Kushal Sachan; Ravindra Kumar; Drishty Katiyar; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

During the Rabi season respective years 2021-22 and 2022-23, a field experiment was conducted at the student instructional farm of CSAUA&T, Kanpur. Experimental soil had a texture of sandy loam. There are 15 treatment combination involved varying combinations of micronutrients and biofertilizers with three replications of randomized block design. The cultivation of lentil variety Lentil- KLS9-3 (Krish) was carried out in accordance with the suggested agronomic practices. It can be concluded from these findings that the two-year results are consistent with the T14 (RDF + ZnSO4 (0.5%) +FeSO4 (0.5%) foliar spray at pre flowering + pod development stage + Rhizobium) showed the highest values economics parameters i.e., maximum cost of cultivation ₹ 38507 & ₹ 39444, gross returns of ₹105799 & ₹ 116068, net return of ₹ 67292 & ₹ 75884 of respective both of years followed by T15.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T14 (RDF + ZnSO4 + FeSO4 foliar spray + Rhizobium) gave the highest economics in lentil: maximum cost of cultivation of ₹ 38507 and ₹ 39444 in the two years.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
T14 (RDF + ZnSO4 (0.5%) +FeSO4 (0.5%) foliar spray at pre flowering + pod development stage + Rhizobium)e0
Outcome
cost of cultivatione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
₹ 38507 & ₹ 39444e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“T14 (RDF + ZnSO4 (0.5%) +FeSO4 (0.5%) foliar spray at pre flowering + pod development stage + Rhizobium) showed the highest values economics parameters i.e., maximum cost of cultivation ₹ 38507 & ₹ 39444, gross returns of ₹105799 & ₹ 116068, net return of ₹ 67292 & ₹ 75884”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T14 (RDF + ZnSO4 + FeSO4 foliar spray + Rhizobium) gave the highest economics in lentil: gross returns of ₹105799 and ₹ 116068 in the two years.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
T14 (RDF + ZnSO4 (0.5%) +FeSO4 (0.5%) foliar spray at pre flowering + pod development stage + Rhizobium)e0
Outcome
gross returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
₹105799 & ₹ 116068e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“T14 (RDF + ZnSO4 (0.5%) +FeSO4 (0.5%) foliar spray at pre flowering + pod development stage + Rhizobium) showed the highest values economics parameters i.e., maximum cost of cultivation ₹ 38507 & ₹ 39444, gross returns of ₹105799 & ₹ 116068, net return of ₹ 67292 & ₹ 75884”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T14 (RDF + ZnSO4 + FeSO4 foliar spray + Rhizobium) gave the highest economics in lentil: net return of ₹ 67292 and ₹ 75884 in the two years.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
T14 (RDF + ZnSO4 (0.5%) +FeSO4 (0.5%) foliar spray at pre flowering + pod development stage + Rhizobium)e0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
₹ 67292 & ₹ 75884e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“T14 (RDF + ZnSO4 (0.5%) +FeSO4 (0.5%) foliar spray at pre flowering + pod development stage + Rhizobium) showed the highest values economics parameters i.e., maximum cost of cultivation ₹ 38507 & ₹ 39444, gross returns of ₹105799 & ₹ 116068, net return of ₹ 67292 & ₹ 75884”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–839 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Rhizobium · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

40 papers: 40 positive, 0 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

99 papers: 86 positive, 13 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

stage · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 57 positive, 4 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.