Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Treatment T14 (RDF + ZnSO4 + FeSO4 foliar spray + Rhizobium) gave the highest economics in lentil: maximum cost of cultivation of ₹ 38507 and ₹ 39444 in the two years.

A claim from Economics of Production Enhancement of Lentil (Lens culinaris L.) through Micronutrient and Bio-inoculants in Central Plains of U. P. · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T14 (RDF + ZnSO4 + FeSO4 foliar spray + Rhizobium) gave the highest economics in lentil: maximum cost of cultivation of ₹ 38507 and ₹ 39444 in the two years.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
T14 (RDF + ZnSO4 (0.5%) +FeSO4 (0.5%) foliar spray at pre flowering + pod development stage + Rhizobium)e0
Outcome
cost of cultivatione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
₹ 38507 & ₹ 39444e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45
e0

“T14 (RDF + ZnSO4 (0.5%) +FeSO4 (0.5%) foliar spray at pre flowering + pod development stage + Rhizobium) showed the highest values economics parameters i.e., maximum cost of cultivation ₹ 38507 & ₹ 39444, gross returns of ₹105799 & ₹ 116068, net return of ₹ 67292 & ₹ 75884”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–839

Title

Economics of Production Enhancement of Lentil (Lens culinaris L.) through Micronutrient and Bio-inoculants in Central Plains of U. P.

Kushal Sachan; Ravindra Kumar; Drishty Katiyar; et al. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports 2024. doi:10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i21838

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-178c449e079fa93025935e20f7be4dadfd048dbd213d8a241bbee1cb702c0bcb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

zinc sulfate · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Rhizobium · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

40 papers: 40 positive, 0 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

99 papers: 86 positive, 13 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

90 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

3 of 5 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.