Paper · 2023 · Annals of Plant and Soil Research

Response of different phosphorus, sulphur and zinc levels on yield and economics of lentil cultivation in sub-humid region of Rajasthan

SUNDAR ANCHRA

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2020-21 and 2021-22 at the Rajasthan College of Agriculture, MPUAT, Udaipur (Rajasthan). The experiment consisted of 18 treatments comprising different levels of phosphorus (three- 30,40 and 50 kg P2O5 ha-1), sulphur (three- 15, 20 and 25 kg S ha-1) and zinc (two- control and 0.5 % ZnSO4). The experiment was laid out in factorial randomized block design (FRBD) and replicated thrice. The results revealed that application of 50 kg P2O5 ha-1 recorded significantly higher biological yield, seed and haulm yield, net returns and benefit cost ratio. Among sulphur levels seed and haulm yield, biological yield, net returns and benefit cost ratio were higher under application of 25 kg S ha-1 and same results were found with foliar spray of 0.5 % ZnSO4 at 55 days after sowing. Thus, it can be concluded that application of 50 kg P2O5 ha-1 with 25 kg S ha-1 and 0.5 % ZnSO4 foliar spray at 55 DAS in lentil is productive as well as profitable.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

50 kg P2O5 ha-1 raised biological, seed and haulm yields significantly.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
50 kg P2O5 ha-1e0
Outcome
biological yield, seed and haulm yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 50 kg P2O5 ha-1 recorded significantly higher biological yield, seed and haulm yield, net returns and benefit cost ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

50 kg P2O5 ha-1 raised net returns and benefit cost ratio significantly.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
50 kg P2O5 ha-1e0
Outcome
net returns and benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 50 kg P2O5 ha-1 recorded significantly higher biological yield, seed and haulm yield, net returns and benefit cost ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

25 kg S ha-1 gave higher seed, haulm and biological yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
25 kg S ha-1e0
Outcome
seed and haulm yield, biological yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed and haulm yield, biological yield, net returns and benefit cost ratio were higher under application of 25 kg S ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–741 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

25 kg S ha-1 gave higher net returns and benefit cost ratio.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
25 kg S ha-1e0
Outcome
net returns and benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed and haulm yield, biological yield, net returns and benefit cost ratio were higher under application of 25 kg S ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–741 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 0.5 % ZnSO4 at 55 days raised seed, haulm and biological yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
foliar spray of 0.5 % ZnSO4 at 55 days after sowinge0
Outcome
seed and haulm yield, biological yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed and haulm yield, biological yield, net returns and benefit cost ratio were higher under application of 25 kg S ha-1 and same results were found with foliar spray of 0.5 % ZnSO4 at 55 days after sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 0.5 % ZnSO4 at 55 days raised returns and benefit cost ratio.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
foliar spray of 0.5 % ZnSO4 at 55 days after sowinge0
Outcome
net returns and benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed and haulm yield, biological yield, net returns and benefit cost ratio were higher under application of 25 kg S ha-1 and same results were found with foliar spray of 0.5 % ZnSO4 at 55 days after sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combined phosphorus, sulphur and zinc treatment as productive and profitable.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Outcome
application of 50 kg P2O5 ha-1 with 25 kg S ha-1 and 0.5 % ZnSO4 foliar spray at 55 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 50 kg P2O5 ha-1 with 25 kg S ha-1 and 0.5 % ZnSO4 foliar spray at 55 DAS in lentil is productive as well as profitable.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–993 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 45 positive, 1 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

application · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 57 positive, 4 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.