Paper · 2015 · Journal of Crop production and processing

Influence of Different Seed Priming Treatments on Yield and Yield Components of Lentil under Terminal Drought Stress Condition

M. A. Aboutalebian; A. Mohagheghi

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

To study the effect of seed priming on seedling emergence characteristics of lentil and evaluate its interaction with drought stress at flowering stage, an experiment was carried out as split plot in a randomized complete block design with three replications at research station of Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran. The main factor consisted drought stress with two levels (conventional irrigation and withholding irrigation at flowering stage) and subplots were seed priming treatments in four levels (priming with zinc sulfate solution, urea solution, distilled water and no-primed). The results showed that priming treatments had positive effects on emergence characteristics, yield and yield components of lentil. Seed priming with zinc sulfate and urea solutions reduced time to 50 percent emergence by 20.15% and increased emergence uniformity coefficient by 15.5 %. The number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, 100 seeds weight, grain and biological yields of stressed plants were reduced in comparison with the conventional irrigation treatment. In this study, seed priming with zinc sulfate solution and distilled water increased the mean of pods per plant by 19% under drought stress conditions. The mean of pods per plant increased by 47% when using zinc sulfate and urea solutions under conventional irrigation conditions. The highest number of seeds per pod (1.3) was obtained through priming with zinc sulfate and urea solutions. Compared to no-primed treatment under drought stress conditions, priming with urea solution increased the grain yield by 28.6% (grain yield was 1652.22 kg/ha) and under conventional irrigation conditions, priming with zinc sulfate solution increased the grain yield by 29.2% (grain yield was 2848.57 kg/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc sulfate and urea priming reduced time to half emergence by 20.15%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
zinc sulfate and urea solutionse0
Outcome
time to 50 percent emergencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
20.15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed priming with zinc sulfate and urea solutions reduced time to 50 percent emergence by 20.15%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield Components of Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc sulfate and urea priming increased emergence uniformity by 15.5%.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
zinc sulfate and urea solutionse1
Outcome
emergence uniformity coefficiente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15.5 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased emergence uniformity coefficient by 15.5 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield Components of Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seed priming with zinc sulfate and urea solutions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced pods per plant, seeds per pod, seed weight and yields compared with conventional irrigation.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
stressed plantse0
Outcome
number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, 100 seeds weight, grain and biological yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
conventional irrigation treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, 100 seeds weight, grain and biological yields of stressed plants were reduced in comparison with the conventional irrigation treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield Components of Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc sulfate and water priming raised pods per plant by 19% under drought.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
zinc sulfate solution and distilled watere0
Outcome
mean of pods per plante0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19%e0
Setting
drought stress conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed priming with zinc sulfate solution and distilled water increased the mean of pods per plant by 19% under drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield Components of Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc sulfate and urea priming raised pods per plant by 47% under conventional irrigation.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
zinc sulfate and urea solutionse0
Outcome
mean of pods per plante0
Direction
increasede0
Value
47%e0
Setting
conventional irrigation conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean of pods per plant increased by 47% when using zinc sulfate and urea solutions under conventional irrigation conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1349 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield Components of Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc sulfate and urea priming produced the highest seeds per pod, 1.3.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
zinc sulfate and urea solutionse0
Outcome
number of seeds per pode0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number of seeds per pod (1.3) was obtained through priming with zinc sulfate and urea solutions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1458 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield Components of Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea priming increased drought-stressed grain yield by 28.6%.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
priming with urea solutione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28.6%e0
Qualifier
1652.22 kg/hae0
Comparator
no-primed treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“priming with urea solution increased the grain yield by 28.6% (grain yield was 1652.22 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield Components of Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to no-primed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc sulfate priming increased grain yield by 29.2% with conventional irrigation.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
priming with zinc sulfate solutione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
29.2%e0
Qualifier
2848.57 kg/hae0
Comparator
no-primed treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“priming with zinc sulfate solution increased the grain yield by 29.2% (grain yield was 2848.57 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1664–1765 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield Components of Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to no-primed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1490 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

zinc sulfate · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

37 papers: 36 positive, 1 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.