Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of salinity stress on Morphophysiological traits in chickpea genotypes

Navyashree R; Ashvathama VH; MD Patil; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Chickpea is grown under a wide range of climatic conditions and is known to be highly sensitive to salinity stress. An experiment was conducted during 2019-20 to study the morpho-physiological responses of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes to salinity stress, in the Department of Crop Physiology at College of Agriculture, Vijayapur. The present study was carried out with ten chickpea genotypes sown under three salinity concentration (0 dSm-1, 3 dSm-1 and 6 dSm-1). All the parameters were recorded at 30, 60 and 90 Days after sowing (DAS). The results indicated that, plant height, relative water content (RWC), SPAD value and membrane injury index were decreased with increase in salinity concentration from 3 dS/m to 6 dS/m. Maximum plant height was observed in 0 dSm-1 salt concentration for all genotypes. Among the genotypes significantly higher Relative Water Content (RWC) was recorded in JG11. While, lowest RWC was recorded in genotype ICCV96029 at 60 days after sowing. From the study it was observed that the genotypes JG 11, BGD 103, MNK 1 and ICC 1431 were tolerant to salinity while, ICCV 96029 and NBeG 47 were found to be salt sensitive genotypes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height, relative water content and SPAD value of chickpea decreased as salinity rose from 3 to 6 dS/m.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
salinity concentratione0
Outcome
plant height, relative water content (RWC), SPAD valuee0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
3 dS/me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of salinity stress on Morphophysiological traits in chickpea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant height, relative water content (RWC), SPAD value and membrane injury index were decreased with increase in salinity concentration from 3 dS/m to 6 dS/m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Membrane injury index of chickpea decreased as salinity rose from 3 to 6 dS/m.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
salinity concentratione0
Outcome
membrane injury indexe0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
3 dS/me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of salinity stress on Morphophysiological traits in chickpea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant height, relative water content (RWC), SPAD value and membrane injury index were decreased with increase in salinity concentration from 3 dS/m to 6 dS/m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum plant height of chickpea genotypes was observed at 0 dS/m salt concentration.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
0 dSm-1 salt concentratione1
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
Maximume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of salinity stress on Morphophysiological traits in chickpea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum plant height was observed in 0 dSm-1 salt concentration for all genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–818 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype JG11 had significantly higher relative water content (RWC) than the other genotypes.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
JG11e2
Outcome
Relative Water Content (RWC)e2
Direction
highere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of salinity stress on Morphophysiological traits in chickpea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the genotypes significantly higher Relative Water Content (RWC) was recorded in JG11”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–910 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype ICCV96029 had the lowest RWC at 60 days after sowing.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
ICCV96029e3
Outcome
RWCe3
Direction
loweste3
Qualifier
at 60 days after sowinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of salinity stress on Morphophysiological traits in chickpea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e3

“lowest RWC was recorded in genotype ICCV96029 at 60 days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–988 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes JG 11, BGD 103, MNK 1 and ICC 1431 were tolerant to salinity.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
JG 11, BGD 103, MNK 1 and ICC 1431e4
Outcome
tolerant to salinitye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of salinity stress on Morphophysiological traits in chickpea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e4

“the genotypes JG 11, BGD 103, MNK 1 and ICC 1431 were tolerant to salinity while, ICCV 96029 and NBeG 47 were found to be salt sensitive genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1172 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes ICCV 96029 and NBeG 47 were salt sensitive.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
ICCV 96029 and NBeG 47e4
Outcome
salt sensitivee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of salinity stress on Morphophysiological traits in chickpea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e4

“the genotypes JG 11, BGD 103, MNK 1 and ICC 1431 were tolerant to salinity while, ICCV 96029 and NBeG 47 were found to be salt sensitive genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1172 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

66 papers: 6 positive, 60 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

salinity · physiology: oxidative · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 2 positive, 14 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

salinity · physiology: water · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

23 papers: 0 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.