Paper · 2024 · Advances in Agriculture

Response of Carrot (Daucus carota L.) to Supplementary Irrigation under Rain‐Fed Agriculture at Jimma and Gera, Jimma Zone, South West Ethiopia

Etefa Tilahun Ashine; Minda Tadesse Bedane; Adissu Asefa Mengesha

19
claims
35
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Evaluating supplementary irrigation under rain‐fed agriculture could help to determine the amount of water depth for water management and increasing productivity. Thus, this study was conducted at the Jimma and Gera to determine the effect of supplementary irrigation (SI) on carrot production. Eight treatments with three replications on a field plot of 9 m 2 were used for conducting the experiment. Crop water requirement (ETc) was calculated from reference evapotranspiration (ETo) and crop coefficient (Kc) using CropWat 8.0 software. Yield and yield component data were collected from the field and analyzed using the statistical analysis system (SAS) software 9.0. The result revealed that root shoulder diameter, fresh biomass, and fresh root weight had significant ( p < 0.05) effects between the treatments, but there was no significant difference ( p > 0.05) between treatments on plant height and carrot root length at both locations. The highest and lowest plant heights were recorded at 75% SI and at a rain‐fed treatment. A root shoulder diameters of 38.37 and 37.86 mm were recorded at Jimma and Gera, respectively, from the application of 75% and two SI at flowering and fruit setting treatment. The application of 75% SI gave the highest root length. A maximum fresh biomass of 3,038.6 kg/ha was obtained at 75% SI, and a minimum fresh biomass of 1,640.00 kg/ha was recorded from the rain‐fed treatment at JARC. Application of 75% SI gave the maximum fresh biomass (2,388.9 kg/ha) at Gera, and a minimum fresh biomass of 1,277.8 kg/ha was recorded from rain fed. An application of 75% SI gave the highest fresh root weight of 7,430.6 kg/ha at JARC. In the study, the application of 75% SI gave the highest (6,388.9 kg/ha) fresh root weight, and the lowest was recorded at rain fed (3,883.3 kg/ha). Therefore, for optimum production, 75% SI was recommended for the production of carrots. The total net benefit from the production of carrots was in the range of 36,659–46,950 ETB per hectare at Jimma and from 24,828 up to 39,399 ETB per hectar at Gera. The maximum and minimum marginal return rate (MRR) at Jimma were 300.97%, which is at 75% SI and 43.69%, which is at 25% supplementary irrigation, respectively. At Gera, the maximum and minimum MRR were 490.95%, which were at 25% supplementary irrigation, and the minimum was 23.18%, which was at full supplementary irrigation. Therefore, to get an economic benefit, supplementing carrot crop at 75% irrigation was recommended for both Gera and JARC.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplementary irrigation significantly affected carrot root shoulder diameter, fresh biomass and fresh root weight.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae2
Treatment
supplementary irrigation (SI)e2
Outcome
root shoulder diameter, fresh biomass, and fresh root weighte3
Qualifier
p < 0.05e3
Setting
Jimma and Gerae2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“this study was conducted at the Jimma and Gera to determine the effect of supplementary irrigation (SI) on carrot production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–293 · show in text ↑
e3

“root shoulder diameter, fresh biomass, and fresh root weight had significant ( p < 0.05) effects between the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–816 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplementary irrigation did not significantly change carrot plant height or root length.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae2
Treatment
supplementary irrigation (SI)e2
Outcome
plant height and carrot root lengthe3
Direction
no significant differencee3
Qualifier
p > 0.05e3
Setting
Jimma and Gerae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“this study was conducted at the Jimma and Gera to determine the effect of supplementary irrigation (SI) on carrot production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–293 · show in text ↑
e3

“there was no significant difference ( p > 0.05) between treatments on plant height and carrot root length at both locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest plant height was recorded at 75% supplementary irrigation and the lowest at the rain-fed treatment.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae2
Treatment
75% SIe4
Outcome
plant heighte4
Direction
higheste4
Comparator
rain‐fed treatmente4
Setting
Jimma and Gerae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“this study was conducted at the Jimma and Gera to determine the effect of supplementary irrigation (SI) on carrot production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–293 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest and lowest plant heights were recorded at 75% SI and at a rain‐fed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1035 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% supplementary irrigation treatment gave the highest carrot root length.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae2
Treatment
75% SIe6
Outcome
root lengthe6
Direction
higheste6
Setting
Jimma and Gerae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“this study was conducted at the Jimma and Gera to determine the effect of supplementary irrigation (SI) on carrot production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–293 · show in text ↑
e6

“The application of 75% SI gave the highest root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root shoulder diameter was 38.37 and 37.86 mm at Jimma and Gera with 75% and two supplementary irrigations at flowering and fruit setting.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae2
Treatment
75% and two SI at flowering and fruit settinge5
Outcome
root shoulder diameterse5
Value
38.37 and 37.86 mme5
Setting
Jimma and Gerae5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“this study was conducted at the Jimma and Gera to determine the effect of supplementary irrigation (SI) on carrot production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–293 · show in text ↑
e5

“A root shoulder diameters of 38.37 and 37.86 mm were recorded at Jimma and Gera, respectively, from the application of 75% and two SI at flowering and fruit setting treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1211 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum fresh biomass of carrot, 3,038.6 kg/ha, was obtained at 75% supplementary irrigation at JARC.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae2
Treatment
75% SIe7
Outcome
fresh biomasse7
Direction
maximume7
Value
3,038.6 kg/hae7
Setting
JARCe7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“this study was conducted at the Jimma and Gera to determine the effect of supplementary irrigation (SI) on carrot production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–293 · show in text ↑
e7

“A maximum fresh biomass of 3,038.6 kg/ha was obtained at 75% SI, and a minimum fresh biomass of 1,640.00 kg/ha was recorded from the rain‐fed treatment at JARC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1428 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The minimum fresh biomass of carrot, 1,640.00 kg/ha, was recorded at JARC under the rain-fed treatment.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae2
Treatment
rain‐fed treatmente7
Outcome
fresh biomasse7
Direction
minimume7
Value
1,640.00 kg/hae7
Setting
JARCe7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“this study was conducted at the Jimma and Gera to determine the effect of supplementary irrigation (SI) on carrot production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–293 · show in text ↑
e7

“A maximum fresh biomass of 3,038.6 kg/ha was obtained at 75% SI, and a minimum fresh biomass of 1,640.00 kg/ha was recorded from the rain‐fed treatment at JARC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1428 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum fresh biomass of carrot, 2,388.9 kg/ha, was obtained at 75% supplementary irrigation at Gera.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae2
Treatment
75% SIe3
Outcome
fresh biomasse3
Direction
maximume3
Value
2,388.9 kg/hae3
Setting
Gerae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“this study was conducted at the Jimma and Gera to determine the effect of supplementary irrigation (SI) on carrot production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–293 · show in text ↑
e3

“Application of 75% SI gave the maximum fresh biomass (2,388.9 kg/ha) at Gera, and a minimum fresh biomass of 1,277.8 kg/ha was recorded from rain fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The minimum fresh biomass of carrot, 1,277.8 kg/ha, was recorded at Gera under rain fed.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae2
Treatment
rain fede3
Outcome
fresh biomasse3
Direction
minimume3
Value
1,277.8 kg/hae3
Setting
Gerae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“this study was conducted at the Jimma and Gera to determine the effect of supplementary irrigation (SI) on carrot production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–293 · show in text ↑
e3

“Application of 75% SI gave the maximum fresh biomass (2,388.9 kg/ha) at Gera, and a minimum fresh biomass of 1,277.8 kg/ha was recorded from rain fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest fresh root weight of carrot, 7,430.6 kg/ha, was obtained with 75% supplementary irrigation at JARC.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae2
Treatment
75% SIe4
Outcome
fresh root weighte4
Direction
higheste4
Value
7,430.6 kg/hae4
Setting
JARCe4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“this study was conducted at the Jimma and Gera to determine the effect of supplementary irrigation (SI) on carrot production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–293 · show in text ↑
e4

“An application of 75% SI gave the highest fresh root weight of 7,430.6 kg/ha at JARC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1665 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest fresh root weight of carrot, 6,388.9 kg/ha, was obtained with 75% supplementary irrigation in the study.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae2
Treatment
75% SIe5
Outcome
fresh root weighte5
Direction
higheste5
Value
6,388.9 kg/hae5
Setting
Jimma and Gerae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“this study was conducted at the Jimma and Gera to determine the effect of supplementary irrigation (SI) on carrot production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–293 · show in text ↑
e5

“In the study, the application of 75% SI gave the highest (6,388.9 kg/ha) fresh root weight, and the lowest was recorded at rain fed (3,883.3 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest fresh root weight of carrot, 3,883.3 kg/ha, was recorded under rain fed.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae2
Treatment
rain fede5
Outcome
fresh root weighte5
Direction
loweste5
Value
3,883.3 kg/hae5
Setting
Jimma and Gerae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“this study was conducted at the Jimma and Gera to determine the effect of supplementary irrigation (SI) on carrot production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–293 · show in text ↑
e5

“In the study, the application of 75% SI gave the highest (6,388.9 kg/ha) fresh root weight, and the lowest was recorded at rain fed (3,883.3 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1814 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 75% supplementary irrigation for optimum carrot production.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae6
Treatment
75% SIe6
Outcome
optimum productione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Therefore, for optimum production, 75% SI was recommended for the production of carrots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–1903 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The total net benefit of carrot production at Jimma was 36,659–46,950 ETB per hectare.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae7
Outcome
total net benefite7
Value
36,659–46,950 ETB per hectaree7
Setting
Jimmae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The total net benefit from the production of carrots was in the range of 36,659–46,950 ETB per hectare at Jimma and from 24,828 up to 39,399 ETB per hectar at Gera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1905–2068 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The total net benefit of carrot production at Gera was 24,828 up to 39,399 ETB per hectare.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae7
Outcome
total net benefite7
Value
24,828 up to 39,399 ETB per hectare7
Setting
Gerae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The total net benefit from the production of carrots was in the range of 36,659–46,950 ETB per hectare at Jimma and from 24,828 up to 39,399 ETB per hectar at Gera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1905–2068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum marginal return rate of carrot at Jimma, 300.97%, was obtained at 75% supplementary irrigation.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae2
Treatment
75% SIe1
Outcome
marginal return rate (MRR)e1
Direction
maximume1
Value
300.97%e1
Setting
Jimmae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“this study was conducted at the Jimma and Gera to determine the effect of supplementary irrigation (SI) on carrot production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–293 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum and minimum marginal return rate (MRR) at Jimma were 300.97%, which is at 75% SI and 43.69%, which is at 25% supplementary irrigation, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2070–2229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The minimum marginal return rate of carrot at Jimma, 43.69%, was obtained at 25% supplementary irrigation.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae2
Treatment
25% supplementary irrigatione1
Outcome
marginal return rate (MRR)e1
Direction
minimume1
Value
43.69%e1
Setting
Jimmae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“this study was conducted at the Jimma and Gera to determine the effect of supplementary irrigation (SI) on carrot production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–293 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum and minimum marginal return rate (MRR) at Jimma were 300.97%, which is at 75% SI and 43.69%, which is at 25% supplementary irrigation, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2070–2229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum marginal return rate of carrot at Gera, 490.95%, was obtained at 25% supplementary irrigation.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae2
Treatment
25% supplementary irrigatione1
Outcome
MRRe1
Direction
maximume1
Value
490.95%e1
Setting
Gerae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“this study was conducted at the Jimma and Gera to determine the effect of supplementary irrigation (SI) on carrot production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–293 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Gera, the maximum and minimum MRR were 490.95%, which were at 25% supplementary irrigation, and the minimum was 23.18%, which was at full supplementary irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2231–2396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The minimum marginal return rate of carrot at Gera, 23.18%, was obtained at full supplementary irrigation.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae2
Treatment
full supplementary irrigatione1
Outcome
MRRe1
Direction
minimume1
Value
23.18%e1
Setting
Gerae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“this study was conducted at the Jimma and Gera to determine the effect of supplementary irrigation (SI) on carrot production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–293 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Gera, the maximum and minimum MRR were 490.95%, which were at 25% supplementary irrigation, and the minimum was 23.18%, which was at full supplementary irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2231–2396 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Daucus carota (carrot)Results differ

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

irrigation · yield · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 18 positive, 7 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.