irrigation · Growth · Daucus carota (carrot)
21 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1
1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Yield and Secondary Root Growth of Carrots as Influenced by Tillage System, Cultivation, and Irrigation1 (1978)
no changeIrrigation did not reduce secondary root growth of carrot in soybean stubble
Method for Evaluating Excessive Secondary Root Development in Carrots1 (1976)decreaseSupplemental irrigation reduced secondary root formation in carrot cultivars.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
1 citation between these papers: 1 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 8
- positive
Method for Evaluating Excessive Secondary Root Development in Carrots1 · 1976
- positive
Response of Seed Carrot to Various Water Regimes. I. Vegetative Growth and Plant Water Relations · 1990
- positive
- negative
Yield and economics of carrot production in organic farming · 2005
- positive
- no effect
Effects of super absorbent polymers application methods on carrot germination and growth · 2010
- positive
Growth and yield of carrot influenced by organic and inorganic fertilizers with irrigation interva · 2019
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- no effect
Factors impacting commercial carrot seed germination rates in hot water treated seed lots · 2025
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.