Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sprinkler irrigated seed had a 1.90% higher germination rate after hot water treatment than seed from furrow irrigated fields

A claim from Factors impacting commercial carrot seed germination rates in hot water treated seed lots · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprinkler irrigated seed had a 1.90% higher germination rate after hot water treatment than seed from furrow irrigated fields

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Treatment
sprinkler irrigated seede5
Outcome
germination rate after hot water treatmente5
Direction
highere5
Value
1.90%e5
Comparator
seed produced in furrow irrigated fieldse5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacterial blight of carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–26
e5

“sprinkler irrigated seed exhibited a 1.90% higher germination rate after hot water treatment when compared to seed produced in furrow irrigated fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1391

Title

Factors impacting commercial carrot seed germination rates in hot water treated seed lots

Gina A. Greenway; Jeremiah Dung Discover Agriculture 2025. doi:10.1007/s44279-025-00258-9

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-1dc143212a623dfcb083428c025c24e99679a9b88f0953977a7999b33f40a429 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Daucus carota (carrot)Results differ

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.