Paper · 2023 · Ecology Environment and Conservation

Effect of insecticide molecules on fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) on maize under field conditions

M.V. Matti; C.P. Mallapur

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Observations on per cent pest infestation by counting all plants were counted per plot and oviposition were taken on 20 randomly selected plants in each treatment on weekly basis and per cent cob damage were recorded 20 randomly selected plants in each treatment. Simultaneously, the counts on natural enemies (predators, parasitized larvae and larval cadavers affected by diseases) were taken on 10 randomly selected plants in each treatment. The grain yield from individual treatment was recorded separately and expressed on hectare basis. The lowest number of egg masses were recorded in chemical treatments and the highest number of egg masses were recorded in untreated check and biopesticides at 21 and 28 days after germination. No egg masses were recorded in all treatments at 70 days after germination. The lowest percent pest infestation recorded inchemical treatments. However, the highest percent pest infestation was recorded in in untreated check and biopesticides at 21 and 28 days after germination. No pest infestation were recorded in all treatments at 70 days after germination. With respect to natural enemy activity, nimbecidine 0.03% @ 3 ml/l, Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki 17,600 IU/mg @ 2 g/l, Metarhiziumrileyi 2 × 108 CFU @ 2 g/l and chloranitraniliprole 18.5 SC @ 0.20 ml/l treatments were as good as untreated check by safe guarding the natural enemy population. Spinetoram 11.7 SC spray @ 0.5 ml/l resulted in highest grain yield which was at par with cyantraniliprole 10 OD @ 0.3 ml/l. Lower yields were obtained from the plots which received biopesticides application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical treatments had the fewest fall armyworm egg masses at 21 and 28 days.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
chemical treatmentse0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat1pest
Outcome
number of egg massese0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
untreated check and biopesticidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lowest number of egg masses were recorded in chemical treatments and the highest number of egg masses were recorded in untreated check and biopesticides at 21 and 28 days after germination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–735 · show in text ↑
t1

“Spodoptera frugiperda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No egg masses were recorded in any treatment at 70 days.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat1pest
Outcome
No egg massese0
Qualifier
70 days after germinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
t1

“Spodoptera frugiperda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“No egg masses were recorded in all treatments at 70 days after germination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical treatments had the lowest pest infestation at 21 and 28 days.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
chemical treatmentse0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat1pest
Outcome
percent pest infestatione0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
untreated check and biopesticidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
t1

“Spodoptera frugiperda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lowest percent pest infestation recorded inchemical treatments. However, the highest percent pest infestation was recorded in in untreated check and biopesticides at 21 and 28 days after germination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–1015 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No pest infestation was recorded in any treatment at 70 days.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat1pest
Outcome
No pest infestatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
t1

“Spodoptera frugiperda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“No pest infestation were recorded in all treatments at 70 days after germination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1097 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nimbecidine safeguarded natural enemy populations as well as the untreated check.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
nimbecidine 0.03% @ 3 ml/le0
Outcome
natural enemy populatione0
Direction
as good ase0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“nimbecidine 0.03% @ 3 ml/l, Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki 17,600 IU/mg @ 2 g/l, Metarhiziumrileyi 2 × 108 CFU @ 2 g/l and chloranitraniliprole 18.5 SC @ 0.20 ml/l treatments were as good as untreated check by safe guarding the natural enemy population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus thuringiensis treatment safeguarded natural enemy populations as well as the untreated check.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki 17,600 IU/mg @ 2 g/le0
Interactor
Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstakiBacillus thuringiensis serovar kurstakie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
natural enemy populatione0
Direction
as good ase0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki 17,600 IU/mg @ 2 g/l, Metarhiziumrileyi 2 × 108 CFU @ 2 g/l and chloranitraniliprole 18.5 SC @ 0.20 ml/l treatments were as good as untreated check by safe guarding the natural enemy population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metarhizium treatment safeguarded natural enemy populations as well as the untreated check.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Metarhiziumrileyi 2 × 108 CFU @ 2 g/le0
Interactor
Metarhiziumrileyie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
natural enemy populatione0
Direction
as good ase0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“Metarhiziumrileyi 2 × 108 CFU @ 2 g/l and chloranitraniliprole 18.5 SC @ 0.20 ml/l treatments were as good as untreated check by safe guarding the natural enemy population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloranitraniliprole safeguarded natural enemy populations as well as the untreated check.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
chloranitraniliprole 18.5 SC @ 0.20 ml/le0
Outcome
natural enemy populatione0
Direction
as good ase0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“chloranitraniliprole 18.5 SC @ 0.20 ml/l treatments were as good as untreated check by safe guarding the natural enemy population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinetoram gave the highest maize grain yield, on par with cyantraniliprole.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Spinetoram 11.7 SC spray @ 0.5 ml/le0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
cyantraniliprole 10 OD @ 0.3 ml/le0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“Spinetoram 11.7 SC spray @ 0.5 ml/l resulted in highest grain yield which was at par with cyantraniliprole 10 OD @ 0.3 ml/l.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopesticide applications gave lower yields.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
biopesticides applicatione0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“Lower yields were obtained from the plots which received biopesticides application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1606 · show in text ↑

Spinetoram · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

biocontrol · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

574 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

625 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.