Abstract
Pakistan is one of the top ten countries which are facing adverse climatic changes and expected to have wide-ranging impressions such as reduced agricultural productivity, inconsistency of water availability, erratic rainfall and increased frequency of extreme climatic events.An experiment titled "Influence of climate smart agriculture approach of barley & pea intercropping on yield, land equivalent ratio and profitability in the agro-climatic condition of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa" was carried out using randomized complete block (RCB) design with three replications.Tallest plants (99.00 cm) with (7.22) number of leaves of barley were recorded in sole while the lowest plant height (93.55 cm) with a low (7.00) number of leaves was observed in intercropping.Also tallest plants (65.88 cm) of pea with (36.77) number of leaves were measured in sole plots while in intercropping plant height (60.22 cm) and number of leaves (35.11) were noted.Highest (38.33) number of grain per spike in barley, (7.22) number of grain per pod and (12.11) number of pod per plant in pea were recorded in sole cropping plots.Highest yield (2071.67) kg per ha in barley and (2018.30)kg per ha in pea were received from sole cropping while the low yield (1725.30) kg per ha in barley and (1440.70)kg per ha in pea were noted in intercropping.Maximum land equivalent ratio (1.51) was recorded from the intercropping system.It was calculated that an income of amounting to Rs. 109392.00 per ha were generated from intercropping vs. Rs.82866.80 per ha from sole cropping of barley, which is almost 32% higher than sole cropping.Therefore, it was concluded from the research trial that a farmers should go for intercropping instead of sole cropping to earn maximum benefits from their land in terms of cash, soil fertility and decrease the pressure of climate change catastrophe, diseases etc.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropped barley had lower plant height (93.55 cm) than sole-cropped barley (99.00 cm).
- Taxon
- barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaree1 - Treatment
- intercroppinge1
- Outcome
- plant heighte1
- Direction
- loweste1
- Value
- 93.55 cme1
- Qualifier
- 99.00 cme1
- Comparator
- solee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“Tallest plants (99.00 cm) with (7.22) number of leaves of barley were recorded in sole while the lowest plant height (93.55 cm) with a low (7.00) number of leaves was observed in intercropping”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropped barley had fewer leaves (7.00) than sole-cropped barley (7.22).
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree1
- Treatment
- intercroppinge1
- Outcome
- number of leavese1
- Direction
- lowe1
- Value
- 7.00e1
- Qualifier
- 7.22e1
- Comparator
- solee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Tallest plants (99.00 cm) with (7.22) number of leaves of barley were recorded in sole while the lowest plant height (93.55 cm) with a low (7.00) number of leaves was observed in intercropping”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropped pea had lower plant height (60.22 cm) than sole-cropped pea (65.88 cm).
- Taxon
- pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse1 - Treatment
- intercroppinge1
- Outcome
- plant heighte1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 60.22 cme1
- Qualifier
- 65.88 cme1
- Comparator
- sole plotse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Also tallest plants (65.88 cm) of pea with (36.77) number of leaves were measured in sole plots while in intercropping plant height (60.22 cm) and number of leaves (35.11) were noted”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropped pea had fewer leaves (35.11) than sole-cropped pea (36.77).
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse1
- Treatment
- intercroppinge1
- Outcome
- number of leavese1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 35.11e1
- Qualifier
- 36.77e1
- Comparator
- sole plotse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Also tallest plants (65.88 cm) of pea with (36.77) number of leaves were measured in sole plots while in intercropping plant height (60.22 cm) and number of leaves (35.11) were noted”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest number of grains per spike in barley (38.33) was recorded in sole cropping plots.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree1
- Outcome
- number of grain per spikee1
- Direction
- Higheste1
- Value
- 38.33e1
- Qualifier
- sole cropping plotse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Highest (38.33) number of grain per spike in barley”
e2“recorded in sole cropping plots”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest number of grains per pod in pea (7.22) was recorded in sole cropping plots.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse1
- Outcome
- number of grain per pode1
- Direction
- Higheste2
- Value
- 7.22e1
- Qualifier
- sole cropping plotse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“(7.22) number of grain per pod and (12.11) number of pod per plant in pea were recorded in sole cropping plots”
e2“Highest (38.33)”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest number of pods per plant in pea (12.11) was recorded in sole cropping plots.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse1
- Outcome
- number of pod per plante1
- Direction
- Higheste2
- Value
- 12.11e1
- Qualifier
- sole cropping plotse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“(7.22) number of grain per pod and (12.11) number of pod per plant in pea were recorded in sole cropping plots”
e2“Highest (38.33)”
Claim · model-written summary
Barley yield was lower under intercropping (1725.30 kg per ha) than under sole cropping (2071.67 kg per ha).
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree1
- Treatment
- intercroppinge1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- lowe1
- Value
- (1725.30) kg per hae1
- Qualifier
- (2071.67) kg per hae1
- Comparator
- sole croppinge1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Highest yield (2071.67) kg per ha in barley and (2018.30)kg per ha in pea were received from sole cropping while the low yield (1725.30) kg per ha in barley and (1440.70)kg per ha in pea were noted in intercropping”
Claim · model-written summary
Pea yield was lower under intercropping (1440.70 kg per ha) than under sole cropping (2018.30 kg per ha).
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse1
- Treatment
- intercroppinge1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- lowe1
- Value
- (1440.70)kg per hae1
- Qualifier
- (2018.30)kg per hae1
- Comparator
- sole croppinge1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Highest yield (2071.67) kg per ha in barley and (2018.30)kg per ha in pea were received from sole cropping while the low yield (1725.30) kg per ha in barley and (1440.70)kg per ha in pea were noted in intercropping”
Claim · model-written summary
The maximum land equivalent ratio (1.51) was recorded in the barley and pea intercropping system.
- Taxon
- barley and peaLathyrus oleraceusHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- intercropping systeme1
- Outcome
- land equivalent ratioe1
- Direction
- Maximume1
- Value
- 1.51e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“barley and pea intercropping”
e1“Maximum land equivalent ratio (1.51) was recorded from the intercropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
Barley intercropping generated an income of Rs. 109392.00 per ha versus Rs.82866.80 per ha from sole cropping, almost 32% higher.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree1
- Treatment
- intercroppinge1
- Outcome
- incomee1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 32%e1
- Qualifier
- Rs. 109392.00 per hae1
- Comparator
- sole croppinge1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“an income of amounting to Rs. 109392.00 per ha were generated from intercropping vs. Rs.82866.80 per ha from sole cropping of barley, which is almost 32% higher than sole cropping”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that farmers should intercrop instead of sole cropping to earn maximum benefits from their land.
- Taxon
- barley and peaLathyrus oleraceusHordeum vulgaret0
- Outcome
- maximum benefitse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“barley and pea intercropping”
e1“farmers should go for intercropping instead of sole cropping to earn maximum benefits from their land”
The same questions in other papers
intercropping · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →intercropping · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →intercropping · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →intercropping · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.