Paper · 2024 · Agricultural Water Management

Enhancing spatial and temporal coordination of soil water and root growth to improve maize (Zea mays L.) yield

Jia Gao; Yingjun Zhang; Chenchen Xu; et al.

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Enhancing the spatial and temporal coordination between soil water and roots is very important for crop growth. The vertical distribution and relationship between soil water and root are however poorly understood during maize growth under different soil water conditions. In this study, two maize hybrids ZD958 and FM985 were treated with drip irrigation (DI), flood irrigation (FI), and rainfed (RF) in two–year field experiment as well as with irrigation at 0–30 (TI), 30–60 (MI), 60–90 (BI), 0–90 cm soil layers (AI) and no irrigation in three–year tube experiment. In field experiment, DI and FI both increased root dry weight, root length density (RLD), and the proportion of coarse root length at different soil layers relative to RF. DI increased grain yield by 10.0% in FM985 and by 10.8% in ZD958 compared with FI. Both total root and fine root length were greater in DI than in FI, which increased the nitrogen and water use efficiency and yield. In the tube experiment, irrigation at different soil layers increased root dry weight, RLD and the proportion of coarse root length compared with no irrigation, with AI increasing the most. FM985 distributed more roots at the 0–30 cm soil layer than ZD958. Grain yields were positively correlated with the RLD in each soil layer and coarse root proportion at the upper layer (r=0.493** in field experiment and r=426** in tube experiment) but negatively correlated with root–shoot ratio (r=−0.793** in field experiment and r=−670** in tube experiment) at maturity stage. In conclusion, there is a large potential to improve maize yield by enhancing the spatial coordination between root distribution and soil water movement.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DI and FI both increased root dry weight, root length density and the proportion of coarse root length at different soil layers relative to rainfed conditions.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Material
ZD958 and FM985e1
Treatment
drip irrigation (DI), flood irrigation (FI)e1
Outcome
root dry weight, root length density (RLD), and the proportion of coarse root length at different soil layerse2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
RFe2
Setting
field experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“two maize hybrids ZD958 and FM985 were treated with drip irrigation (DI), flood irrigation (FI), and rainfed (RF) in two–year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–429 · show in text ↑
e2

“DI and FI both increased root dry weight, root length density (RLD), and the proportion of coarse root length at different soil layers relative to RF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DI increased grain yield by 10.0% in FM985 compared with FI.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Material
FM985e3
Treatment
DIe3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Value
10.0%e3
Comparator
FIe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“two maize hybrids ZD958 and FM985 were treated with drip irrigation (DI), flood irrigation (FI), and rainfed (RF) in two–year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–429 · show in text ↑
e3

“DI increased grain yield by 10.0% in FM985 and by 10.8% in ZD958 compared with FI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DI increased grain yield by 10.8% in ZD958 compared with FI.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Material
ZD958e3
Treatment
DIe3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Value
10.8%e3
Comparator
FIe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“two maize hybrids ZD958 and FM985 were treated with drip irrigation (DI), flood irrigation (FI), and rainfed (RF) in two–year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–429 · show in text ↑
e3

“DI increased grain yield by 10.0% in FM985 and by 10.8% in ZD958 compared with FI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total root length and fine root length were greater under DI than under FI.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
DIe4
Outcome
total root and fine root lengthe4
Direction
greatere4
Comparator
FIe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“two maize hybrids ZD958 and FM985 were treated with drip irrigation (DI), flood irrigation (FI), and rainfed (RF) in two–year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–429 · show in text ↑
e4

“Both total root and fine root length were greater in DI than in FI, which increased the nitrogen and water use efficiency and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–955 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DI increased nitrogen and water use efficiency and yield compared with FI.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
DIe4
Outcome
nitrogen and water use efficiency and yielde4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
FIe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“two maize hybrids ZD958 and FM985 were treated with drip irrigation (DI), flood irrigation (FI), and rainfed (RF) in two–year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–429 · show in text ↑
e4

“Both total root and fine root length were greater in DI than in FI, which increased the nitrogen and water use efficiency and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–955 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at different soil layers increased root dry weight, RLD and the proportion of coarse root length compared with no irrigation in the tube experiment.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
irrigation at different soil layerse5
Outcome
root dry weight, RLD and the proportion of coarse root lengthe5
Direction
increasede5
Comparator
no irrigatione5
Setting
tube experimente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“two maize hybrids ZD958 and FM985 were treated with drip irrigation (DI), flood irrigation (FI), and rainfed (RF) in two–year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–429 · show in text ↑
e5

“In the tube experiment, irrigation at different soil layers increased root dry weight, RLD and the proportion of coarse root length compared with no irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AI increased root dry weight, RLD and coarse root proportion the most in the tube experiment.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
AIe6
Outcome
root dry weight, RLD and the proportion of coarse root lengthe5
Direction
increasing the moste6
Setting
tube experimente5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“two maize hybrids ZD958 and FM985 were treated with drip irrigation (DI), flood irrigation (FI), and rainfed (RF) in two–year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–429 · show in text ↑
e5

“In the tube experiment, irrigation at different soil layers increased root dry weight, RLD and the proportion of coarse root length compared with no irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1116 · show in text ↑
e6

“with AI increasing the most”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1145 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FM985 distributed more roots at the 0–30 cm soil layer than ZD958.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Material
FM985e7
Outcome
roots at the 0–30 cm soil layere7
Direction
moree7
Comparator
ZD958e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“two maize hybrids ZD958 and FM985 were treated with drip irrigation (DI), flood irrigation (FI), and rainfed (RF) in two–year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–429 · show in text ↑
e7

“FM985 distributed more roots at the 0–30 cm soil layer than ZD958”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1212 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yields were positively correlated with RLD in each soil layer and with coarse root proportion at the upper layer in the field experiment.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
grain yieldse3
Direction
positively correlatede3
Value
r=0.493**e3
Qualifier
the RLD in each soil layer and coarse root proportion at the upper layere3
Setting
field experimente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“two maize hybrids ZD958 and FM985 were treated with drip irrigation (DI), flood irrigation (FI), and rainfed (RF) in two–year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–429 · show in text ↑
e3

“Grain yields were positively correlated with the RLD in each soil layer and coarse root proportion at the upper layer (r=0.493** in field experiment and r=426** in tube experiment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1394 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yields were positively correlated with RLD in each soil layer and with coarse root proportion at the upper layer in the tube experiment.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
grain yieldse3
Direction
positively correlatede3
Value
r=426**e3
Qualifier
the RLD in each soil layer and coarse root proportion at the upper layere3
Setting
tube experimente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“two maize hybrids ZD958 and FM985 were treated with drip irrigation (DI), flood irrigation (FI), and rainfed (RF) in two–year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–429 · show in text ↑
e3

“Grain yields were positively correlated with the RLD in each soil layer and coarse root proportion at the upper layer (r=0.493** in field experiment and r=426** in tube experiment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1394 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yields were negatively correlated with root–shoot ratio in the field experiment at maturity stage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Organ / stage
maturity stagee4
Outcome
grain yieldse4
Direction
negatively correlatede4
Value
r=−0.793**e4
Qualifier
root–shoot ratioe4
Setting
field experimente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“two maize hybrids ZD958 and FM985 were treated with drip irrigation (DI), flood irrigation (FI), and rainfed (RF) in two–year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–429 · show in text ↑
e4

“Grain yields were positively correlated with the RLD in each soil layer and coarse root proportion at the upper layer (r=0.493** in field experiment and r=426** in tube experiment) but negatively correlated with root–shoot ratio (r=−0.793** in field experiment and r=−670** in tube experiment) at maturity stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1525 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yields were negatively correlated with root–shoot ratio in the tube experiment at maturity stage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Organ / stage
maturity stagee4
Outcome
grain yieldse4
Direction
negatively correlatede4
Value
r=−670**e4
Qualifier
root–shoot ratioe4
Setting
tube experimente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“two maize hybrids ZD958 and FM985 were treated with drip irrigation (DI), flood irrigation (FI), and rainfed (RF) in two–year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–429 · show in text ↑
e4

“Grain yields were positively correlated with the RLD in each soil layer and coarse root proportion at the upper layer (r=0.493** in field experiment and r=426** in tube experiment) but negatively correlated with root–shoot ratio (r=−0.793** in field experiment and r=−670** in tube experiment) at maturity stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1525 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

There is a large potential to improve maize yield by enhancing spatial coordination between root distribution and soil water movement.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
improve maize yielde5
Qualifier
large potentiale5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“two maize hybrids ZD958 and FM985 were treated with drip irrigation (DI), flood irrigation (FI), and rainfed (RF) in two–year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–429 · show in text ↑
e5

“there is a large potential to improve maize yield by enhancing the spatial coordination between root distribution and soil water movement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1542–1679 · show in text ↑

flooding · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

68 papers: 12 positive, 56 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

irrigation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

289 papers: 208 positive, 81 negative or no effect

207 papers in the same direction as this paper · 80 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

285 papers more in this group

See all 289 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

324 papers: 284 positive, 40 negative or no effect

283 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

320 papers more in this group

See all 324 papers →

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,012 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.