Paper · 2024 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Studies on pollen micro-morphology, pollen storage methods, and cross-compatibility among grape (Vitis spp.) genotypes

Prabhanjan Rane; Madhubala Thakre; Mahendra Kumar Verma; et al.

15
claims
23
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The knowledge of pollen morphology, suitable storage condition, and species compatibility is vital for a successful grapevine improvement programme. Ten grape genotypes from three different species, viz. , Vitis vinifera L., Vitis parviflora Roxb., and Vitis champini Planc., were studied for their pollen structure and pollen storage with the objective of determining their utilization in grape rootstock improvement programs. Pollen morphology was examined through the use of a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The viability of the pollen was assessed using 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC). In vitro pollen germination was investigated using the semi-solid medium with 10 % sucrose, 100 mg/L boric acid, and 300 mg/L calcium nitrate. The results revealed variations in pollen micro-morphology in 10 genotypes, with distinct pollen dimensions, shapes, and exine ornamentation. However, species-wise, no clear difference was found for these parameters. Pollen of V. parviflora Roxb. and Dogridge was acolporated and did not germinate. The remaining eight genotypes exhibited tricolporated pollen and showed satisfactory in vitro pollen germination. Storage temperature and duration interactions showed that, at room temperature, pollen of most of the grape genotypes can be stored for up to 1 day only with an acceptable pollen germination rate (>30 %). However, storage for up to 7 days was successfully achieved at 4 °C, except for ‘Pearl of Csaba’. The most effective storage conditions were found to be at −20 °C and −196 °C (in liquid N 2 ), enabling pollen storage for a period of up to 30 days, and can be used for pollination to overcome the challenge of asynchronous flowering. Four interspecific combinations were studied for their compatibility, among which V. parviflora Roxb. × V. vinifera L. (Pusa Navrang) and V. parviflora Roxb. × V. champini Planc. (Salt Creek) showed high cross-compatibility, offering their potential use for grape rootstock breeding. However, V. parviflora Roxb. × V. vinifera L. (Male Hybrid) recorded the lowest compatibility index among studied crosses. In the case of self-pollinated flowers from V. parviflora Roxb. and V. parviflora Roxb. × V. champini Planc. (Dogridge), pollen failed to germinate on the stigma due to male sterility caused by acolporated pollen. As a result, the flowers of these genotypes functioned as females, which means they are ideal female parents for grape breeding without the need for the tedious process of emasculation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten grape genotypes varied in pollen dimensions, shapes and exine ornamentation.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
10 genotypese0
Outcome
pollen dimensions, shapes, and exine ornamentatione0

Verbatim

e0

“variations in pollen micro-morphology in 10 genotypes, with distinct pollen dimensions, shapes, and exine ornamentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Species showed no clear pollen morphology differences.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
these parameterse0
Direction
no clear differencee0

Verbatim

e0

“species-wise, no clear difference was found for these parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V. parviflora pollen was acolporated and failed to germinate.

Taxon
V. parviflora Roxb.Vitis parviflorae0
Outcome
Pollene0

Verbatim

e0

“Pollen of V. parviflora Roxb. and Dogridge was acolporated and did not germinate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1047 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dogridge pollen was acolporated and failed to germinate.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
Dogridgee0
Outcome
Pollene0

Verbatim

e0

“Pollen of V. parviflora Roxb. and Dogridge was acolporated and did not germinate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight other genotypes had tricolporated pollen and satisfactory in vitro germination.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
eight genotypese0
Outcome
in vitro pollen germinatione0

Verbatim

e0

“The remaining eight genotypes exhibited tricolporated pollen and showed satisfactory in vitro pollen germination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At room temperature most grape pollen retained acceptable germination for one day.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
room temperaturee0
Outcome
pollen germination ratee0
Value
>30 %e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“at room temperature, pollen of most of the grape genotypes can be stored for up to 1 day only with an acceptable pollen germination rate (>30 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1365 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 4 °C grape pollen could be stored seven days except Pearl of Csaba.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
4 °Ce0
Outcome
storagee0
Value
7 dayse0
Qualifier
except for ‘Pearl of Csaba’e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“storage for up to 7 days was successfully achieved at 4 °C, except for ‘Pearl of Csaba’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1463 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At −20 °C grape pollen could be stored for up to 30 days.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
−20 °Ce0
Outcome
pollen storagee0
Value
30 dayse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“−20 °C and −196 °C (in liquid N 2 ), enabling pollen storage for a period of up to 30 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1613 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At −196 °C grape pollen could be stored for up to 30 days.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
−196 °Ce0
Outcome
pollen storagee0
Value
30 dayse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“−20 °C and −196 °C (in liquid N 2 ), enabling pollen storage for a period of up to 30 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1613 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V. parviflora × V. vinifera Pusa Navrang had high cross compatibility.

Taxon
V. parviflora Roxb.Vitis parviflorae0
Material
Pusa Navrange0
Interactor
V. vinifera L.Vitis viniferae0other
Outcome
cross-compatibilitye0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · InteractorDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“V. parviflora Roxb. × V. vinifera L. (Pusa Navrang) and V. parviflora Roxb. × V. champini Planc. (Salt Creek) showed high cross-compatibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1782–1923 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V. parviflora × V. champini Salt Creek had high cross compatibility.

Taxon
V. parviflora Roxb.Vitis parviflorae0
Material
Salt Creeke0
Interactor
V. champini Planc.Vitis ×champiniie0other
Outcome
cross-compatibilitye0
Direction
highe0

Verbatim

e0

“V. parviflora Roxb. × V. vinifera L. (Pusa Navrang) and V. parviflora Roxb. × V. champini Planc. (Salt Creek) showed high cross-compatibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1782–1923 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V. parviflora × V. vinifera Male Hybrid had the lowest compatibility index.

Taxon
V. parviflora Roxb.Vitis parviflorae0
Material
Male Hybride0
Interactor
V. vinifera L.Vitis viniferae0other
Outcome
compatibility indexe0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · InteractorDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“V. parviflora Roxb. × V. vinifera L. (Male Hybrid) recorded the lowest compatibility index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1993–2083 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Self-pollinated V. parviflora pollen failed to germinate on stigmas.

Taxon
V. parviflora Roxb.Vitis parviflorae0
Outcome
pollen failed to germinate on the stigmae0

Verbatim

e0

“self-pollinated flowers from V. parviflora Roxb. and V. parviflora Roxb. × V. champini Planc. (Dogridge), pollen failed to germinate on the stigma due to male sterility caused by acolporated pollen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2122–2319 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V. parviflora × V. champini Dogridge pollen failed to germinate on stigmas.

Taxon
V. parviflora Roxb.Vitis parviflorae0
Material
Dogridgee0
Interactor
V. champini Planc.Vitis ×champiniie0other
Outcome
pollen failed to germinate on the stigmae0

Verbatim

e0

“self-pollinated flowers from V. parviflora Roxb. and V. parviflora Roxb. × V. champini Planc. (Dogridge), pollen failed to germinate on the stigma due to male sterility caused by acolporated pollen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2122–2319 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

These male-sterile grape genotypes can serve as female parents without emasculation.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
ideal female parents for grape breedinge0

Verbatim

e0

“flowers of these genotypes functioned as females, which means they are ideal female parents for grape breeding without the need for the tedious process of emasculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2338–2505 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑