Paper · 2024 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Soil drought during the development of cotton ovule destroyed the antioxidant balance of cotton pistil to hinder the ovule formation

Mengdie Cheng; Zhanhan Wang; Yuting Cao; et al.

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Reproductive failure in cotton caused by drought has been reported to be closely associated with alterations in pistil fertility; however, the mechanism of the effect of drought on pistil fertility in cotton is less studied. We hypothesized that drought would inhibit the ovule formation to alter pistil potential fertility. To address this hypothesis, we conducted a water deficit induction experiment with a cotton cultivar, Dexiamian 1. Results showed that drought damaged the cytological structure of the developing ovules. This resulted in a lower ovule number, finally leading to lower cottonseed number and boll weight. And the decreased ovule number was closely related to the reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation in pistil during ovule development. Further analysis of antioxidant metabolism found that in the enzymatic antioxidant system, drought decreased the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT), resulting in the accumulation of superoxide anion () and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ). Regarding the non‐enzymatic antioxidant system, the elevated glutathione reductase gene ( GhGR ) expression under drought promoted the glutathione (GSH) accumulation; however, the decreased dehydroascorbate reductase gene ( GhDHAR2 ) expression under drought inhibited the conversion of GSH to ascorbic acid (AsA). Although the increased monodehydroascorbate reductase gene ( GhMDHAR ) expression under drought promoted AsA accumulation, drought‐induced reduced ascorbate peroxidase gene ( GhAPX ) expression inhibited the reduction of H 2 O 2 by AsA, which ultimately led to higher AsA content and H 2 O 2 content. We conclude that drought impedes the ovule formation by disturbing pistil's antioxidant metabolic homeostasis to destruct the cytological structure of the developing ovules.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought damaged the cytological structure of the developing cotton ovules.

Material
Dexiamian 1e1
Organ / stage
developing ovulese0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
cytological structure of the developing ovulese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soil drought during the development of cotton ovule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“drought damaged the cytological structure of the developing ovules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–535 · show in text ↑
e1

“we conducted a water deficit induction experiment with a cotton cultivar, Dexiamian 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought lowered the ovule number of cotton.

Organ / stage
developing ovulese0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
ovule numbere1
Direction
lowere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soil drought during the development of cotton ovule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“drought damaged the cytological structure of the developing ovules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–535 · show in text ↑
e1

“This resulted in a lower ovule number, finally leading to lower cottonseed number and boll weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought lowered cottonseed number and boll weight in cotton.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
cottonseed number and boll weighte1
Direction
lowere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soil drought during the development of cotton ovule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“drought damaged the cytological structure of the developing ovules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–535 · show in text ↑
e1

“This resulted in a lower ovule number, finally leading to lower cottonseed number and boll weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–634 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decreased ovule number in cotton was closely related to reactive oxygen species accumulation in the pistil during ovule development.

Compound
reactive oxygen species (ROS)e0
Outcome
ovule numbere0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soil drought during the development of cotton ovule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“the decreased ovule number was closely related to the reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation in pistil during ovule development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased the activities of superoxide dismutase and catalase in cotton pistil.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soil drought during the development of cotton ovule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“drought decreased the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought led to accumulation of superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide in cotton pistil.

Treatment
droughtt0
Outcome
superoxide anion () and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 )e0
Direction
increaseinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soil drought during the development of cotton ovule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“resulting in the accumulation of superoxide anion () and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1032 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated glutathione reductase gene GhGR expression under drought promoted glutathione (GSH) accumulation in cotton.

Treatment
droughte0
Gene
GhGRe0
Outcome
glutathione (GSH) accumulatione0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soil drought during the development of cotton ovule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“the elevated glutathione reductase gene ( GhGR ) expression under drought promoted the glutathione (GSH) accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decreased dehydroascorbate reductase gene GhDHAR2 expression under drought inhibited the conversion of GSH to ascorbic acid in cotton.

Treatment
droughtt0
Gene
GhDHAR2e0
Outcome
conversion of GSH to ascorbic acid (AsA)e0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soil drought during the development of cotton ovule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“the decreased dehydroascorbate reductase gene ( GhDHAR2 ) expression under drought inhibited the conversion of GSH to ascorbic acid (AsA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1347 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased monodehydroascorbate reductase gene GhMDHAR expression under drought promoted ascorbate accumulation in cotton.

Treatment
droughtt0
Gene
GhMDHARe0
Outcome
AsA accumulatione0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soil drought during the development of cotton ovule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“the increased monodehydroascorbate reductase gene ( GhMDHAR ) expression under drought promoted AsA accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced ascorbate peroxidase gene GhAPX expression under drought inhibited the reduction of H2O2 by ascorbate in cotton.

Treatment
droughtt0
Gene
GhAPXe0
Outcome
reduction of H 2 O 2 by AsAe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soil drought during the development of cotton ovule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“drought‐induced reduced ascorbate peroxidase gene ( GhAPX ) expression inhibited the reduction of H 2 O 2 by AsA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought ultimately led to higher ascorbate content and higher H2O2 content in cotton pistil.

Treatment
droughtt0
Outcome
AsA content and H 2 O 2 contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soil drought during the development of cotton ovule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“which ultimately led to higher AsA content and H 2 O 2 content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1586–1648 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

20 papers: 13 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

25 papers: 5 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

drought · soil: physics · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

drought · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 19 positive, 63 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.