Abstract
A field experiment was carried out in the research farm of the Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidhyalaya, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India during Kharif season of 2021-22. The experiment was performed with nine treatments comprised by Rhizobium, Pseudomonas, EM and their consortia with FUI and UFUI (absolute control) in randomized block design. The soybean crop was grown in the field along with recommended package of practices. The result showed that the yield of soybean was 43% higher (2351 kg ha -1) than control FUI and better uptake of N (145 kg ha-1 by seed and 125.6 kg ha-1 by straw), P (7.9 kg ha-1 by seed and 14.9 kg ha-1 by straw) and K (42.3 kg ha-1 by seed and 65.0 kg ha-1 by straw) by soybean were found due to inoculation of microbial consortia of Rhizobium, Pseudomonas and EM culture. The Physico-chemical properties (pH, EC and OC), availability of nutrients (NPK with vales of 288, 29 and 335 kg ha-1 respectively), enzymatic activities (Acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase and dehydrogenase activities with values of 42.2, 69. 8 µg PNG h-1 g-1 of soil and 12.9 μg TPF hr-1 g-1 of soil, respectively) and microbial population (Rhizobium by 35.1×106, total bacteria by 39.3×107, fungi by 41.9×104 and actinomycetes by 38.7×103 cfu g-1 soil) in soil also improved with the same treatment as compared to FUI. It is strongly recommended that the inoculation of microbial consortia improved the soil health and soybean production too instead of single inoculation by modulating microbial population which improves the soil health by nutrient fixation, solubilization and mobilization and plant growth promotion.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean yield was 43% higher with the microbial consortia treatment than with the control FUI.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe1 - Treatment
- inoculation of microbial consortia of Rhizobium, Pseudomonas and EM culturee2
- Second interactor
- Pseudomonas
Pseudomonase2other - Outcome
- yield of soybeane1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 43%e1
- Comparator
- control FUIe1
- Setting
- Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Indiae3
RhizobiumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The result showed that the yield of soybean was 43% higher (2351 kg ha -1) than control FUI”
e2“better uptake of N (145 kg ha-1 by seed and 125.6 kg ha-1 by straw), P (7.9 kg ha-1 by seed and 14.9 kg ha-1 by straw) and K (42.3 kg ha-1 by seed and 65.0 kg ha-1 by straw) by soybean were found due to inoculation of microbial consortia of Rhizobium, Pseudomonas and EM culture”
e3“research farm of the Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidhyalaya, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen uptake by soybean was better with the microbial consortia, at 145 kg/ha by seed and 125.6 kg/ha by straw.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe2
- Treatment
- inoculation of microbial consortia of Rhizobium, Pseudomonas and EM culturee2
- Second interactor
- PseudomonasPseudomonase2other
- Outcome
- uptakee2
- Direction
- bettere2
- Value
- 145 kg ha-1 by seed and 125.6 kg ha-1 by strawe2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“better uptake of N (145 kg ha-1 by seed and 125.6 kg ha-1 by straw), P (7.9 kg ha-1 by seed and 14.9 kg ha-1 by straw) and K (42.3 kg ha-1 by seed and 65.0 kg ha-1 by straw) by soybean were found due to inoculation of microbial consortia of Rhizobium, Pseudomonas and EM culture”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus uptake by soybean was better with the microbial consortia, at 7.9 kg/ha by seed and 14.9 kg/ha by straw.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe2
- Treatment
- inoculation of microbial consortia of Rhizobium, Pseudomonas and EM culturee2
- Second interactor
- PseudomonasPseudomonase2other
- Outcome
- uptakee2
- Direction
- bettere2
- Value
- 7.9 kg ha-1 by seed and 14.9 kg ha-1 by strawe2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“better uptake of N (145 kg ha-1 by seed and 125.6 kg ha-1 by straw), P (7.9 kg ha-1 by seed and 14.9 kg ha-1 by straw) and K (42.3 kg ha-1 by seed and 65.0 kg ha-1 by straw) by soybean were found due to inoculation of microbial consortia of Rhizobium, Pseudomonas and EM culture”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium uptake by soybean was better with the microbial consortia, at 42.3 kg/ha by seed and 65.0 kg/ha by straw.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe2
- Treatment
- inoculation of microbial consortia of Rhizobium, Pseudomonas and EM culturee2
- Second interactor
- PseudomonasPseudomonase2other
- Outcome
- uptakee2
- Direction
- bettere2
- Value
- 42.3 kg ha-1 by seed and 65.0 kg ha-1 by strawe2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“better uptake of N (145 kg ha-1 by seed and 125.6 kg ha-1 by straw), P (7.9 kg ha-1 by seed and 14.9 kg ha-1 by straw) and K (42.3 kg ha-1 by seed and 65.0 kg ha-1 by straw) by soybean were found due to inoculation of microbial consortia of Rhizobium, Pseudomonas and EM culture”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil nutrient availability (NPK) was improved by the microbial consortia compared with FUI.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe3
- Treatment
- inoculation of microbial consortia of Rhizobium, Pseudomonas and EM culturee3
- Second interactor
- PseudomonasPseudomonase3other
- Outcome
- availability of nutrientse1
- Direction
- improvede2
- Value
- 288, 29 and 335 kg ha-1e1
- Comparator
- FUIe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“availability of nutrients (NPK with vales of 288, 29 and 335 kg ha-1 respectively)”
e2“in soil also improved with the same treatment as compared to FUI”
e3“better uptake of N (145 kg ha-1 by seed and 125.6 kg ha-1 by straw), P (7.9 kg ha-1 by seed and 14.9 kg ha-1 by straw) and K (42.3 kg ha-1 by seed and 65.0 kg ha-1 by straw) by soybean were found due to inoculation of microbial consortia of Rhizobium, Pseudomonas and EM culture”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil enzymatic activities were improved by the microbial consortia compared with FUI.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe3
- Treatment
- inoculation of microbial consortia of Rhizobium, Pseudomonas and EM culturee3
- Second interactor
- PseudomonasPseudomonase3other
- Outcome
- enzymatic activitiese1
- Direction
- improvede2
- Comparator
- FUIe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“enzymatic activities (Acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase and dehydrogenase activities”
e2“in soil also improved with the same treatment as compared to FUI”
e3“better uptake of N (145 kg ha-1 by seed and 125.6 kg ha-1 by straw), P (7.9 kg ha-1 by seed and 14.9 kg ha-1 by straw) and K (42.3 kg ha-1 by seed and 65.0 kg ha-1 by straw) by soybean were found due to inoculation of microbial consortia of Rhizobium, Pseudomonas and EM culture”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil microbial populations were improved by the microbial consortia compared with FUI.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe3
- Treatment
- inoculation of microbial consortia of Rhizobium, Pseudomonas and EM culturee3
- Second interactor
- PseudomonasPseudomonase3other
- Outcome
- microbial populatione1
- Direction
- improvede2
- Comparator
- FUIe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“microbial population (Rhizobium by 35.1×106”
e2“in soil also improved with the same treatment as compared to FUI”
e3“better uptake of N (145 kg ha-1 by seed and 125.6 kg ha-1 by straw), P (7.9 kg ha-1 by seed and 14.9 kg ha-1 by straw) and K (42.3 kg ha-1 by seed and 65.0 kg ha-1 by straw) by soybean were found due to inoculation of microbial consortia of Rhizobium, Pseudomonas and EM culture”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation with microbial consortia is recommended over single inoculation to improve soil health and soybean production.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe1
- Treatment
- inoculation of microbial consortiae1
- Outcome
- soil health and soybean productione1
- Comparator
- single inoculatione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“It is strongly recommended that the inoculation of microbial consortia improved the soil health and soybean production too instead of single inoculation”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
88 papers more in this group
See all 92 papers →Rhizobium · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →Rhizobium · physiology: enzyme activity · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Pseudomonas · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Rhizobium · soil: biology · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Pseudomonas · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →inoculation · physiology: enzyme activity · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →inoculation · soil: biology · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.