Paper · 2024 · Journal of Sustainable Agricultural and Environmental Sciences

The Physiological Effect of Foliar Spraying of Zinc Nanoparticles in Reducing the Harmful Effects of Cadmium on Faba Bean Plants

Aya Nofal; Hanafey Maswada; Amina Zedan; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Heavy metal pollution is the one of the most important factors that limit the growth and yield of faba bean plants in the world. In recent years, nanotechnology has showen promising result in reducing the harmful effects of heavy metal stress on various crops such as peas (Pisum sativum), faba beans (Vicia faba leguminosae). This experiment aimed to study the effect of foliar spray of zinc nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) at two concentrations (100 and 200 ppm) on the growth parameters shoot length, root length, fresh and dry weight of shoots and roots, and leaf area of faba bean plants. In addition, the content of chlorophyll and carotenoids were measured under Cd stress (20 and 100 ppm). The samples were collected twice, 15 and 30 days after treatments. The results showed that Cd had adverse effects on shoot and root lengths, shoot fresh and dry weights, root fresh and dry weights, and leaf area. The treatment with ZnO NPs significantly reduced the side effects of Cd on the level of growth parameters at two stages. ZnO NPs 200 was more effective than ZnO NPs 100. From our results, ZnO NPs can be used to mitigate the Cd stress in agricultural soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium had adverse effects on shoot and root lengths of faba bean.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
Cde0
Outcome
shoot and root lengthse0
Direction
adverse effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cd had adverse effects on shoot and root lengths, shoot fresh and dry weights, root fresh and dry weights, and leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium had adverse effects on shoot fresh and dry weights of faba bean.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
Cde0
Outcome
shoot fresh and dry weightse0
Direction
adverse effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cd had adverse effects on shoot and root lengths, shoot fresh and dry weights, root fresh and dry weights, and leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium had adverse effects on root fresh and dry weights of faba bean.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
Cde0
Outcome
root fresh and dry weightse0
Direction
adverse effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cd had adverse effects on shoot and root lengths, shoot fresh and dry weights, root fresh and dry weights, and leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium had adverse effects on leaf area of faba bean.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
Cde0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
adverse effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cd had adverse effects on shoot and root lengths, shoot fresh and dry weights, root fresh and dry weights, and leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ZnO nanoparticle treatment significantly reduced the side effects of Cd on faba bean growth parameters at both sampling stages.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
ZnO NPse0
Outcome
side effects of Cd on the level of growth parameterse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
at two stagese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“The treatment with ZnO NPs significantly reduced the side effects of Cd on the level of growth parameters at two stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO NPs at 200 ppm were more effective than ZnO NPs at 100 ppm in mitigating Cd effects on faba bean.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
ZnO NPs 200e0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
ZnO NPs 100e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“ZnO NPs 200 was more effective than ZnO NPs 100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1071 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that ZnO NPs can be used to mitigate Cd stress in agricultural soils.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
ZnO NPse0
Outcome
mitigate the Cd stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“ZnO NPs can be used to mitigate the Cd stress in agricultural soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1158 · show in text ↑

zinc oxide · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cadmium atom · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 3 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 18 positive, 4 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.