Paper · 2024 · Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management

Response of chickpea's yield and yield components to double inoculation with mycorrhiza and rhizobium under split application of nitrogen

Babak Malekian; Mehdi Parsa; Mohammad Hassan Fallah; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The utilization of advantageous microorganisms as a biofertilizer has gained significant importance in the agricultural industry due to their potential contribution to food safety and the sustainable cultivation of crops. To evaluate the effect of nitrogen (N) fertilizer and co‐inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhiza and rhizobium on the yield and yield component of chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.), a 2‐year field experiment was conducted in 2020–2021 at the Agricultural Research Station of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran. The experiment was designed as a randomized block trial in factorial design with three replicates. The treatments included two levels of inoculation (noninoculated and inoculated with rhizobium and mycorrhiza) and application of different levels of N fertilizer (0, 25, or 50 kg ha −1 ) at three growth stages (sowing, flowering, pod filling) as follows; F0 (0,0,0), F1 (25,0,0), F2 (25,25,0), F3 (25,25,25), F4 (50,0,0), F5 (50,50,0) and F6 (50,50,50), respectively. The results showed that seed inoculation and split N fertilization significantly increased yield and yield components in chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.). Seed inoculation showed the highest values for all traits studied compared to the noninoculated treatments. Moreover, among the fertilizer treatments, the highest values for plant height (41.8 cm), number of branches (9.1), number of grains per plant (17.8) and 100‐grain weight (30.4 g) from F6 through the F3 treatment, were statistically similar. The results show that the effect of inoculation is more significant when a lower amount of N fertilizer is applied. Due to the health and environmental problems associated with chemical fertilizers, double inoculation and split application of N fertilizers at lower doses can be recommended.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation and split nitrogen fertilization significantly increased chickpea yield and yield components.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
seed inoculation and split N fertilizatione0
Outcome
yield and yield componentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed inoculation and split N fertilization significantly increased yield and yield components in chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation produced the highest values for all studied traits relative to noninoculated treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Seed inoculatione0
Outcome
all traits studiede0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
noninoculated treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed inoculation showed the highest values for all traits studied compared to the noninoculated treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1267 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F6 through F3 had statistically similar highest plant heights of 41.8 cm.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
F6 through the F3 treatmente0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
41.8 cme0
Qualifier
statistically similare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest values for plant height (41.8 cm), number of branches (9.1), number of grains per plant (17.8) and 100‐grain weight (30.4 g) from F6 through the F3 treatment, were statistically similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F6 through F3 had statistically similar highest branch numbers of 9.1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
F6 through the F3 treatmente0
Outcome
number of branchese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
9.1e0
Qualifier
statistically similare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest values for plant height (41.8 cm), number of branches (9.1), number of grains per plant (17.8) and 100‐grain weight (30.4 g) from F6 through the F3 treatment, were statistically similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F6 through F3 had statistically similar highest grain number per plant of 17.8.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
F6 through the F3 treatmente0
Outcome
number of grains per plante0
Direction
higheste0
Value
17.8e0
Qualifier
statistically similare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest values for plant height (41.8 cm), number of branches (9.1), number of grains per plant (17.8) and 100‐grain weight (30.4 g) from F6 through the F3 treatment, were statistically similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F6 through F3 had statistically similar highest 100-grain weight of 30.4 g.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
F6 through the F3 treatmente0
Outcome
100‐grain weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
30.4 ge0
Qualifier
statistically similare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest values for plant height (41.8 cm), number of branches (9.1), number of grains per plant (17.8) and 100‐grain weight (30.4 g) from F6 through the F3 treatment, were statistically similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation had a more significant effect at lower nitrogen fertilizer amounts.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
effect of inoculatione0
Direction
more significante0
Qualifier
when a lower amount of N fertilizer is appliede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of inoculation is more significant when a lower amount of N fertilizer is applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1625 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend double inoculation and lower split nitrogen doses.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
double inoculation and split application of N fertilizers at lower dosese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“double inoculation and split application of N fertilizers at lower doses can be recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–1801 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.