Paper · 2010 · http://www.waset.org/journals/waset/v44/v44-193.pdf

Effect Of Organic Matter And Biofertilizers On Chickpea Quality And Biological Nitrogen Fixation

Khosro Mohammadi; Ghalavand, Amir; Aghaalikhani, Majid

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

In order to evaluation the effects of soil organic matter and biofertilizer on chickpea quality and biological nitrogen fixation, field experiments were carried out in 2007 and 2008 growing seasons. In this research the effects of different strategies for soil fertilization were investigated on grain yield and yield component, minerals, organic compounds and cooking time of chickpea. Experimental units were arranged in split-split plots based on randomized complete blocks with three replications. Main plots consisted of (G1): establishing a mixed vegetation of Vicia panunica and Hordeum vulgare and (G2): control, as green manure levels. Also, five strategies for obtaining the base fertilizer requirement including (N1): 20 t.ha-1 farmyard manure; (N2): 10 t.ha-1 compost; (N3): 75 kg.ha-1 triple super phosphate; (N4): 10 t.ha-1 farmyard manure + 5 t.ha-1 compost and (N5): 10 t.ha-1 farmyard manure + 5 t.ha-1 compost + 50 kg.ha-1 triple super phosphate were considered in sub plots. Furthermoree four levels of biofertilizers consisted of (B1): Bacillus lentus + Pseudomonas putida; (B2): Trichoderma harzianum; (B3): Bacillus lentus + Pseudomonas putida + Trichoderma harzianum; and (B4): control (without biofertilizers) were arranged in sub-sub plots. Results showed that integrating biofertilizers (B3) and green manure (G1) produced the highest grain yield. The highest amounts of yield were obtained in G1×N5 interaction. Comparison of all 2-way and 3-way interactions showed that G1N5B3 was determined as the superior treatment. Significant increasing of N, P2O5, K2O, Fe and Mg content in leaves and grains emphasized on superiority of mentioned treatment because each one of these nutrients has an approved role in chlorophyll synthesis and photosynthesis abilities of the crops. The combined application of compost, farmyard manure and chemical phosphorus (N5) in addition to having the highest yield, had the best grain quality due to high protein, starch and total sugar contents, low crude fiber and reduced cooking time.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined biofertilizers B3 and green manure G1 gave the highest grain yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
integrating biofertilizers (B3) and green manure (G1)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that integrating biofertilizers (B3) and green manure (G1) produced the highest grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1373 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G1×N5 gave the highest yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
G1×N5e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest amounts of yield were obtained in G1×N5 interaction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1438 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G1N5B3 ranked as the superior treatment in interaction comparisons.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
G1N5B3e0
Outcome
superior treatmente0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
all 2-way and 3-way interactionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparison of all 2-way and 3-way interactions showed that G1N5B3 was determined as the superior treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified treatment significantly increased N content in chickpea leaves and grains.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
mentioned treatmente0
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increasing of N, P2O5, K2O, Fe and Mg content in leaves and grains emphasized on superiority of mentioned treatment because each one of these nutrients has an approved role in chlorophyll synthesis and photosynthesis abilities of the crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1799 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified treatment significantly increased P2O5 content in chickpea leaves and grains.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
mentioned treatmente0
Outcome
P2O5e0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increasing of N, P2O5, K2O, Fe and Mg content in leaves and grains emphasized on superiority of mentioned treatment because each one of these nutrients has an approved role in chlorophyll synthesis and photosynthesis abilities of the crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1799 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified treatment significantly increased K2O content in chickpea leaves and grains.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
mentioned treatmente0
Outcome
K2Oe0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increasing of N, P2O5, K2O, Fe and Mg content in leaves and grains emphasized on superiority of mentioned treatment because each one of these nutrients has an approved role in chlorophyll synthesis and photosynthesis abilities of the crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1799 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified treatment significantly increased Fe content in chickpea leaves and grains.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
mentioned treatmente0
Outcome
Fee0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increasing of N, P2O5, K2O, Fe and Mg content in leaves and grains emphasized on superiority of mentioned treatment because each one of these nutrients has an approved role in chlorophyll synthesis and photosynthesis abilities of the crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1799 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified treatment significantly increased Mg content in chickpea leaves and grains.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
mentioned treatmente0
Outcome
Mge0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increasing of N, P2O5, K2O, Fe and Mg content in leaves and grains emphasized on superiority of mentioned treatment because each one of these nutrients has an approved role in chlorophyll synthesis and photosynthesis abilities of the crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1799 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N5 had the highest yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
combined application of compost, farmyard manure and chemical phosphorus (N5)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of compost, farmyard manure and chemical phosphorus (N5) in addition to having the highest yield, had the best grain quality due to high protein, starch and total sugar contents, low crude fiber and reduced cooking time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1800–2045 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N5 had high protein, starch and total sugar contents.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
combined application of compost, farmyard manure and chemical phosphorus (N5)e0
Outcome
protein, starch and total sugar contentse0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of compost, farmyard manure and chemical phosphorus (N5) in addition to having the highest yield, had the best grain quality due to high protein, starch and total sugar contents, low crude fiber and reduced cooking time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1800–2045 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N5 lowered crude fiber.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
combined application of compost, farmyard manure and chemical phosphorus (N5)e0
Outcome
crude fibere0
Direction
lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of compost, farmyard manure and chemical phosphorus (N5) in addition to having the highest yield, had the best grain quality due to high protein, starch and total sugar contents, low crude fiber and reduced cooking time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1800–2045 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N5 reduced cooking time.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
combined application of compost, farmyard manure and chemical phosphorus (N5)e0
Outcome
cooking timee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of compost, farmyard manure and chemical phosphorus (N5) in addition to having the highest yield, had the best grain quality due to high protein, starch and total sugar contents, low crude fiber and reduced cooking time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1800–2045 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 48 positive, 2 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 161 positive, 7 negative or no effect

160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

phosphorus · quality: grain · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

phosphorus · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.