Paper · 2009 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Increasing Chickpea Quality And Agroecosystm Sustainability Using Organic And Natural Resources

Mohammadi, K.; Ghalavand, A.; Aghaalikhani, M.; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

In order to increase in chickpea quality and agroecosystem sustainability, field experiments were carried out in 2007 and 2008 growing seasons. In this research the effects of different organic, chemical and biological fertilizers were investigated on grain yield and quality of chickpea. Experimental units were arranged in split-split plots based on randomized complete blocks with three replications. The highest amounts of yield and yield components were obtained in G1×N5 interaction. Significant increasing of N, P, K, Fe and Mg content in leaves and grains emphasized on superiority of mentioned treatment because each one of these nutrients has an approved role in chlorophyll synthesis and photosynthesis ability of the crop. The combined application of compost, farmyard manure and chemical phosphorus (N5) had the best grain quality due to high protein, starch and total sugar contents, low crude fiber and reduced cooking time.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest yield and yield components of chickpea were obtained in the G1×N5 interaction.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
G1×N5 interactione1
Outcome
yield and yield componentse1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–19 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest amounts of yield and yield components were obtained in G1×N5 interaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–488 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Significant increases in N, P and K content in chickpea leaves and grains were reported.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
leaves and grainse1
Outcome
N, P, Ke1
Direction
increasinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–19 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant increasing of N, P, K, Fe and Mg content in leaves and grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–563 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Significant increases in Fe and Mg content in chickpea leaves and grains were reported.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
leaves and grainse1
Outcome
Fe and Mg contente1
Direction
increasinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–19 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant increasing of N, P, K, Fe and Mg content in leaves and grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined application of compost, farmyard manure and chemical phosphorus (N5) gave high grain protein, starch and total sugar contents in chickpea.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
combined application of compost, farmyard manure and chemical phosphorus (N5)e1
Outcome
protein, starch and total sugar contentse1
Direction
highe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–19 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combined application of compost, farmyard manure and chemical phosphorus (N5) had the best grain quality due to high protein, starch and total sugar contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined application of compost, farmyard manure and chemical phosphorus (N5) gave low crude fiber in chickpea grain.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
combined application of compost, farmyard manure and chemical phosphorus (N5)e1
Outcome
crude fibere2
Direction
lowe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–19 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combined application of compost, farmyard manure and chemical phosphorus (N5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–816 · show in text ↑
e2

“low crude fiber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–913 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined application of compost, farmyard manure and chemical phosphorus (N5) reduced cooking time of chickpea.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
combined application of compost, farmyard manure and chemical phosphorus (N5)e1
Outcome
cooking timee2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–19 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combined application of compost, farmyard manure and chemical phosphorus (N5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–816 · show in text ↑
e2

“reduced cooking time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–938 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 48 positive, 2 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

phosphorus · quality: grain · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

phosphorus · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.