Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Different Levels of NPK and Zinc on Soil Health Growth and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) var. PUSA 362

Ankur Sahu; Narendra Swaroop; Arun Alfred David; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The study entitled The Effect of different level of NPK and Zinc on soil health, growth and yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Cv-Pusa-362 was carried out at the research farm of Soil science and agriculture chemistry, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Science, Prayagraj during the season of Rabi 2019-20. The soil of the experimental area was sandy loam in texture. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with three levels of N P & K (0%, 50% and 100%) and three levels of Zinc (0%, 50% and 100%). The experimental results revealed that significantly maximum growth parameters like plant height(42.9cm), number of branches (19.6) and yield attributes like number of pods (63.1), number of seeds pods-1 (1.6), test weight (28.38g), total grain yield (25.13q ha-1) were noticed under T9 (@100 % NPK + 100 % Zn) as compared to rest of the treatments and lowest under T1 (Control). And the result shows that pH, EC (dSm-1), Bulk density (Mg m-3), Particle density(Mg m-3), Pore space (%), Organic carbon (%), available Nitrogen (306.24kg ha-1), phosphorus (28.96kg ha-1), potassium (210.23kg ha-1) and Zinc (0.89kg ha-1) on the soil showed significant effect with T9 (@100 % NPK + 100 % Zn). Maximum gross return, net return (Rs.124849) and B:C ratio (1:4.24) were also recorded with the treatment T9 (@100 % NPK + 100 % Zn).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 maximized chickpea plant height at 42.9 cm.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
T9 (@100 % NPK + 100 % Zn)e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
42.9cme0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“significantly maximum growth parameters like plant height(42.9cm), number of branches (19.6) and yield attributes like number of pods (63.1), number of seeds pods-1 (1.6), test weight (28.38g), total grain yield (25.13q ha-1) were noticed under T9 (@100 % NPK + 100 % Zn) as compared to rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 maximized branch number at 19.6.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
T9 (@100 % NPK + 100 % Zn)e0
Outcome
number of branchese0
Direction
maximume0
Value
19.6e0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“significantly maximum growth parameters like plant height(42.9cm), number of branches (19.6) and yield attributes like number of pods (63.1), number of seeds pods-1 (1.6), test weight (28.38g), total grain yield (25.13q ha-1) were noticed under T9 (@100 % NPK + 100 % Zn) as compared to rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 maximized pod number at 63.1.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
T9 (@100 % NPK + 100 % Zn)e0
Outcome
number of podse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
63.1e0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“significantly maximum growth parameters like plant height(42.9cm), number of branches (19.6) and yield attributes like number of pods (63.1), number of seeds pods-1 (1.6), test weight (28.38g), total grain yield (25.13q ha-1) were noticed under T9 (@100 % NPK + 100 % Zn) as compared to rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 maximized seeds per pod at 1.6.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
T9 (@100 % NPK + 100 % Zn)e0
Outcome
number of seeds pods-1e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.6e0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“significantly maximum growth parameters like plant height(42.9cm), number of branches (19.6) and yield attributes like number of pods (63.1), number of seeds pods-1 (1.6), test weight (28.38g), total grain yield (25.13q ha-1) were noticed under T9 (@100 % NPK + 100 % Zn) as compared to rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 maximized test weight at 28.38 g.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
T9 (@100 % NPK + 100 % Zn)e0
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
28.38ge0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“significantly maximum growth parameters like plant height(42.9cm), number of branches (19.6) and yield attributes like number of pods (63.1), number of seeds pods-1 (1.6), test weight (28.38g), total grain yield (25.13q ha-1) were noticed under T9 (@100 % NPK + 100 % Zn) as compared to rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 maximized grain yield at 25.13 q ha-1.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
T9 (@100 % NPK + 100 % Zn)e0
Outcome
total grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
25.13q ha-1e0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“significantly maximum growth parameters like plant height(42.9cm), number of branches (19.6) and yield attributes like number of pods (63.1), number of seeds pods-1 (1.6), test weight (28.38g), total grain yield (25.13q ha-1) were noticed under T9 (@100 % NPK + 100 % Zn) as compared to rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 maximized net return at Rs.124849.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
T9 (@100 % NPK + 100 % Zn)e0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
Rs.124849e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum gross return, net return (Rs.124849) and B:C ratio (1:4.24) were also recorded with the treatment T9 (@100 % NPK + 100 % Zn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 maximized benefit-cost ratio at 1:4.24.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
T9 (@100 % NPK + 100 % Zn)e0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
1:4.24e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum gross return, net return (Rs.124849) and B:C ratio (1:4.24) were also recorded with the treatment T9 (@100 % NPK + 100 % Zn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1368 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

38 papers: 35 positive, 3 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

71 papers: 67 positive, 4 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

zinc atom · quality: grain · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 99 positive, 6 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.