Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Effect of NPK and Zinc Inorganic Fertilizers on Soil Health, Growth and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Lokendra Meena; Ram Bharose; Arun Alfred David; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An objective of study effect on inorganic sources of NPK and Zn fertilizers on soil health with the experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with three levels of NPK (00%, 50% and 100%), and Zinc (00%, 50% and 100%) Recommended Dose of fertilizer applied in all treatments. The result showed that the soil properties, growth and yield of chickpea were significantly affected by application of NPK and Zinc. The highest growth and yield were observed in T9 (100%NPK +100% Zinc), followed by T8 (100% NPK and +50%Zinc ) ,whereas the lowest growth and yield were observed in T1 (00% NPK +00% Zinc). The treatment T9 (NPK @ 100 % +Zn @ 100%) was recorded as best treatment for major soil parameters. The treatment T9 (NPK @ 100% + Zn @ 100 %) also shows the significantly highest vegetative growth as well as yield attributes and net profit ₹45,186.00 ha-1 with cost benefit ratio is 1:2.17.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK and zinc application significantly affected soil properties, growth and yield of chickpea

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
application of NPK and Zince1
Outcome
soil properties, growth and yielde1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“The result showed that the soil properties, growth and yield of chickpea were significantly affected by application of NPK and Zinc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 (100% NPK + 100% Zinc) gave the highest growth and yield of chickpea

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
T9 (100%NPK +100% Zinc)e2
Outcome
growth and yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Comparator
T1 (00% NPK +00% Zinc)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–110 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest growth and yield were observed in T9 (100%NPK +100% Zinc), followed by T8 (100% NPK and +50%Zinc ) ,whereas the lowest growth and yield were observed in T1 (00% NPK +00% Zinc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 (no NPK and no zinc) gave the lowest growth and yield of chickpea

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
T1 (00% NPK +00% Zinc)e2
Outcome
growth and yielde2
Direction
loweste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–110 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest growth and yield were observed in T9 (100%NPK +100% Zinc), followed by T8 (100% NPK and +50%Zinc ) ,whereas the lowest growth and yield were observed in T1 (00% NPK +00% Zinc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 (NPK @ 100% + Zn @ 100%) was the best treatment for major soil parameters

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
T9 (NPK @ 100 % +Zn @ 100%)e3
Outcome
major soil parameterse3
Direction
beste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–110 · show in text ↑
e3

“The treatment T9 (NPK @ 100 % +Zn @ 100%) was recorded as best treatment for major soil parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 (NPK @ 100% + Zn @ 100%) significantly gave the highest vegetative growth and yield attributes of chickpea

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
T9 (NPK @ 100% + Zn @ 100 %)e4
Outcome
vegetative growth as well as yield attributese4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–110 · show in text ↑
e4

“The treatment T9 (NPK @ 100% + Zn @ 100 %) also shows the significantly highest vegetative growth as well as yield attributes and net profit ₹45,186.00 ha-1 with cost benefit ratio is 1:2.17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 (NPK @ 100% + Zn @ 100%) gave the highest net profit of 45,186.00 ha-1 for chickpea

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
T9 (NPK @ 100% + Zn @ 100 %)e4
Outcome
net profite4
Direction
higheste4
Value
₹45,186.00 ha-1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–110 · show in text ↑
e4

“The treatment T9 (NPK @ 100% + Zn @ 100 %) also shows the significantly highest vegetative growth as well as yield attributes and net profit ₹45,186.00 ha-1 with cost benefit ratio is 1:2.17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 (NPK @ 100% + Zn @ 100%) gave a cost benefit ratio of 1:2.17 for chickpea

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
T9 (NPK @ 100% + Zn @ 100 %)e4
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe4
Value
1:2.17e4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–110 · show in text ↑
e4

“The treatment T9 (NPK @ 100% + Zn @ 100 %) also shows the significantly highest vegetative growth as well as yield attributes and net profit ₹45,186.00 ha-1 with cost benefit ratio is 1:2.17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–896 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

71 papers: 67 positive, 4 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.