Paper · 2019 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Impact of biofortification of zinc and iron on growth parameters and yields of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) through agronomic intervention in Chhattisgarh plains

Hema Deshlahare; GP Banjara

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during Rabi season in 2018-19 at Instructional Cum Research Farm of IGKV, Raipur (Chattisgarh). To study the “Impact of biofortification of zinc and iron on growth parameters and yields of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) through agronomic intervention in Chhattisgarh plains” The experiment was laid out in Split Plot Design with four replications. The experiment consists of two varieties viz., Vaibhav and Indira chana-1 and nutrient levels of different zinc and iron treatment combination. The significant variation was found in chickpea varieties and nutrient levels of different zinc and iron treatment combinations. The maximum plant growth parameters viz., plant height, dry matter accumulation, number of branches recorded under variety Indira chana-1. In case of different Zn and Fe treatment combination, the treatment RDF+ Soil application of ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 at basal recorded maximum plant growth parameter viz., plant height, dry matter accumulation, number of branches at 30 DAS and later stage of crop growth treatment RDF+ ZnSO4 and FeSO4 through foliar application at pre flowering and pod formation stage” at 60 DAS, 90 DAS and at harvest where as plant population showing non significant variation in varieties and different Zn and Fe treatment combination at 20 DAS. The maximum plant population recorded at harvest under variety Indira chana-1 and treatment RDF+ ZnSO4 and FeSO4 through foliar application at pre flowering and pod formation stage followed by treatment RDF+ Soil application of ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 at basal. The maximum seed yield, stover yield and harvest index observed under variety Indira chana-1 as compared to variety vaibhav. In case nutrient levels of different Zn and Fe treatment combination, the treatment RDF+ ZnSO4 and FeSO4 through foliar application at pre flowering and pod formation stage recorded maximum seed yield, stover yield and harvest index.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indira chana-1 had maximum plant height, dry matter accumulation and branch number.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Indira chana-1e0
Outcome
plant height, dry matter accumulation, number of branchese0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum plant growth parameters viz., plant height, dry matter accumulation, number of branches recorded under variety Indira chana-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal soil ZnSO4 at 25 kg ha-1 gave maximum plant height, dry matter and branch number at 30 DAS.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
RDF+ Soil application of ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 at basale0
Outcome
plant height, dry matter accumulation, number of branchese0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
at 30 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RDF+ Soil application of ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 at basal recorded maximum plant growth parameter viz., plant height, dry matter accumulation, number of branches at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ZnSO4 and FeSO4 at preflowering and pod formation gave maximum growth parameters at later stages.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
RDF+ ZnSO4 and FeSO4 through foliar application at pre flowering and pod formation stagee0
Outcome
plant height, dry matter accumulation, number of branchese0
Qualifier
at 60 DAS, 90 DAS and at harveste0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant growth parameter viz., plant height, dry matter accumulation, number of branches at 30 DAS and later stage of crop growth treatment RDF+ ZnSO4 and FeSO4 through foliar application at pre flowering and pod formation stage” at 60 DAS, 90 DAS and at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant population at 20 DAS did not vary significantly by variety or nutrient treatment.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
plant populatione0
Direction
non significant variatione0
Qualifier
at 20 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant population showing non significant variation in varieties and different Zn and Fe treatment combination at 20 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indira chana-1 had the maximum plant population at harvest.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Indira chana-1e0
Outcome
plant populatione0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
at harveste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum plant population recorded at harvest under variety Indira chana-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1400 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ZnSO4 and FeSO4 treatment gave the maximum plant population at harvest.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
RDF+ ZnSO4 and FeSO4 through foliar application at pre flowering and pod formation stagee0
Outcome
plant populatione0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
RDF+ Soil application of ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 at basale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum plant population recorded at harvest under variety Indira chana-1 and treatment RDF+ ZnSO4 and FeSO4 through foliar application at pre flowering and pod formation stage followed by treatment RDF+ Soil application of ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 at basal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1578 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indira chana-1 had maximum seed yield, stover yield and harvest index compared with vaibhav.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Indira chana-1e0
Outcome
seed yield, stover yield and harvest indexe0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
vaibhave0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum seed yield, stover yield and harvest index observed under variety Indira chana-1 as compared to variety vaibhav”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1703 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ZnSO4 and FeSO4 treatment gave maximum seed yield, stover yield and harvest index.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
RDF+ ZnSO4 and FeSO4 through foliar application at pre flowering and pod formation stagee0
Outcome
seed yield, stover yield and harvest indexe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RDF+ ZnSO4 and FeSO4 through foliar application at pre flowering and pod formation stage recorded maximum seed yield, stover yield and harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1789–1937 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–87 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

34 papers: 33 positive, 1 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

zinc sulfate · pest · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · pest · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · pest · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

stage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 42 positive, 5 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

177 papers: 173 positive, 4 negative or no effect

172 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

173 papers more in this group

See all 177 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.