Paper · 2024 · Asian Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition

Effect of Foliar Nutrition on Growth, Yield and Yield Attributes of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under Medium Black Calcareous Soil

J. J. Vaghani; D. R. Vala; R. V. Patel; et al.

10
claims
37
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A study was conducted to laid out under medium black calcareous soil during rabi 2019-20 at the Instructional Farm, Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh. The experiment followed a randomized block design (RBD) with three replications, comprising with 10 treatments. The results of the field study indicated that growth, yield and yield attributes of chickpea was significantly influenced by foliar nutrition. The growth, yield and yield attributes parameters viz., plant height (44.50 cm), no. of branches per plant (9.31), no. of nodules per plant (9.88), no. of pods per plant (42.65) and test weight (16.30 g), seed (2395 kg ha-1) and stover yield (3675 kg ha-1) were recorded significantly higher under 100% RDF + 1.0 % (Mono Ammonium Phosphate) at 30 and 45 DAS, at harvest, but plant population and number of seeds per pod did not affect significantly with foliar application of WSF at harvest. At 50 DAS plant height (34.78 cm) and number of branches per plant (6.35) are also significantly highest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height was significantly higher (44.50 cm) under 100% RDF + 1.0 % MAP at 30 and 45 DAS.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100% RDF + 1.0 % (Mono Ammonium Phosphate) at 30 and 45 DASe1
Outcome
plant heighte2
Direction
highere1
Value
44.50 cme2
Setting
medium black calcareous soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“under medium black calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“were recorded significantly higher under 100% RDF + 1.0 % (Mono Ammonium Phosphate) at 30 and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–820 · show in text ↑
e2

“plant height (44.50 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of branches per plant was significantly higher (9.31) under 100% RDF + 1.0 % MAP at 30 and 45 DAS.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100% RDF + 1.0 % (Mono Ammonium Phosphate) at 30 and 45 DASe1
Outcome
no. of branches per plante2
Direction
highere1
Value
9.31e2
Setting
medium black calcareous soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“under medium black calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“were recorded significantly higher under 100% RDF + 1.0 % (Mono Ammonium Phosphate) at 30 and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–820 · show in text ↑
e2

“no. of branches per plant (9.31)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of nodules per plant was significantly higher (9.88) under 100% RDF + 1.0 % MAP at 30 and 45 DAS.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100% RDF + 1.0 % (Mono Ammonium Phosphate) at 30 and 45 DASe1
Outcome
no. of nodules per plante2
Direction
highere1
Value
9.88e2
Setting
medium black calcareous soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“under medium black calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“were recorded significantly higher under 100% RDF + 1.0 % (Mono Ammonium Phosphate) at 30 and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–820 · show in text ↑
e2

“no. of nodules per plant (9.88)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–609 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of pods per plant was significantly higher (42.65) under 100% RDF + 1.0 % MAP at 30 and 45 DAS.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100% RDF + 1.0 % (Mono Ammonium Phosphate) at 30 and 45 DASe1
Outcome
no. of pods per plante2
Direction
highere1
Value
42.65e2
Setting
medium black calcareous soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“under medium black calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“were recorded significantly higher under 100% RDF + 1.0 % (Mono Ammonium Phosphate) at 30 and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–820 · show in text ↑
e2

“no. of pods per plant (42.65)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Test weight was significantly higher (16.30 g) under 100% RDF + 1.0 % MAP at 30 and 45 DAS.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100% RDF + 1.0 % (Mono Ammonium Phosphate) at 30 and 45 DASe1
Outcome
test weighte2
Direction
highere1
Value
16.30 ge2
Setting
medium black calcareous soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“under medium black calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“were recorded significantly higher under 100% RDF + 1.0 % (Mono Ammonium Phosphate) at 30 and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–820 · show in text ↑
e2

“test weight (16.30 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–666 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield was significantly higher (2395 kg ha-1) under 100% RDF + 1.0 % MAP at 30 and 45 DAS.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100% RDF + 1.0 % (Mono Ammonium Phosphate) at 30 and 45 DASe1
Outcome
seede2
Direction
highere1
Value
2395 kg ha-1e2
Setting
medium black calcareous soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“under medium black calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“were recorded significantly higher under 100% RDF + 1.0 % (Mono Ammonium Phosphate) at 30 and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–820 · show in text ↑
e2

“seed (2395 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stover yield was significantly higher (3675 kg ha-1) under 100% RDF + 1.0 % MAP at 30 and 45 DAS.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100% RDF + 1.0 % (Mono Ammonium Phosphate) at 30 and 45 DASe1
Outcome
stover yielde2
Direction
highere1
Value
3675 kg ha-1e2
Setting
medium black calcareous soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“under medium black calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“were recorded significantly higher under 100% RDF + 1.0 % (Mono Ammonium Phosphate) at 30 and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–820 · show in text ↑
e2

“stover yield (3675 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 50 DAS, plant height was significantly highest (34.78 cm).

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
plant heighte3
Direction
significantly higheste3
Value
34.78 cme3
Setting
medium black calcareous soile0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“under medium black calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–68 · show in text ↑
e3

“At 50 DAS plant height (34.78 cm) and number of branches per plant (6.35) are also significantly highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1059 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 50 DAS, number of branches per plant was significantly highest (6.35).

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
number of branches per plante3
Direction
significantly higheste3
Value
6.35e3
Setting
medium black calcareous soile0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“under medium black calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–68 · show in text ↑
e3

“At 50 DAS plant height (34.78 cm) and number of branches per plant (6.35) are also significantly highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1059 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of WSF at harvest did not affect plant population or number of seeds per pod in chickpea.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
foliar application of WSFe4
Outcome
plant population and number of seeds per pode4
Direction
did not affecte4
Setting
medium black calcareous soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“under medium black calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–68 · show in text ↑
e4

“plant population and number of seeds per pod did not affect significantly with foliar application of WSF at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–953 · show in text ↑

ammonium dihydrogen phosphate · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

48 papers: 43 positive, 5 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

application · pest · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 99 positive, 6 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.