Paper · 2018 · The Agrarian Scientific Journal

The influence of mineral fertilizers, biological products on the yield of chickpea on southern chernozem

E.N. Mikhailichenko; K.I. Pimonov; A.N. Danilov; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Influence of different doses of mineral fertilizers and biological products on the nutrient status of the soil depending on the basic soil cultivation methods during chickpeas cultivation is studied. Experiments were carried out on southern chernozem according to the generally accepted methods. It is shown, that application of monoammonium phosphate had a significant advantage in improving nutrient status of the southern chernozem front of the ammonium nitrate. It was revealed that the starting dose of nitrogen applicated with phosphorus during various types of the main tillage, influences on the symbiosis of chickpeas with nodule bacteria. The best way of basic soil cultivation for nut, after spring wheat is plowing to a depth of 25–27 cm. The highest yield of chickpea (1.70 t/ha) was when combined: seeding after ploughing during application of ekstrasol, seed inoculation with rizotorfin and starter treatment with monoammonium phosphate in a dose of N12P50. To gain control was 0.61 t/ha or 56.0%. Application of nitrogen-phosphoric fertilizers during seed treatment with ekstrasol in a dose of N12P50 is effective, productivity was more than in control by 0.41 t/ha or 37.6%. In the options of experience where risotorphine was not applicated, tubercle bacteria were not formed. Ammophos contributed to the accumulation of phosphates, in the phase of seed formation there were 19.7–19.8 mg/kg of phosphoric acid in the soil. In the north-west zone of the Rostov region a system of fertilizer with a nitrogen starting dose of N12 together with phosphorus P50 during sowing is low-cost, has not negative effect on properties and composition of southern chernozem and does not contribute to pollution of the natural environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Monoammonium phosphate improved soil nutrient status relative to ammonium nitrate.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
monoammonium phosphatee0
Outcome
nutrient status of the southern chernozeme0
Direction
improvinge0
Comparator
ammonium nitratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of monoammonium phosphate had a significant advantage in improving nutrient status of the southern chernozem front of the ammonium nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–464 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starting nitrogen with phosphorus influenced chickpea symbiosis with nodule bacteria under various tillage types.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume0
Treatment
starting dose of nitrogen applicated with phosphoruse0
Interactor
nodule bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
symbiosis of chickpeas with nodule bacteriae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“starting dose of nitrogen applicated with phosphorus during various types of the main tillage, influences on the symbiosis of chickpeas with nodule bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–647 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Plowing to 25–27 cm after spring wheat was identified as the best basic cultivation practice.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
plowing to a depth of 25–27 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“The best way of basic soil cultivation for nut, after spring wheat is plowing to a depth of 25–27 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–750 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined plowing, ekstrasol, rizotorfin inoculation, and monoammonium phosphate produced the highest chickpea yield of 1.70 t/ha, 0.61 t/ha or 56.0% above control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
seeding after ploughing during application of ekstrasol, seed inoculation with rizotorfin and starter treatment with monoammonium phosphate in a dose of N12P50e0
Interactor
rizotorfine0symbiont
Outcome
yield of chickpeae0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.70 t/hae0
Qualifier
0.61 t/ha or 56.0%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield of chickpea (1.70 t/ha) was when combined: seeding after ploughing during application of ekstrasol, seed inoculation with rizotorfin and starter treatment with monoammonium phosphate in a dose of N12P50. To gain control was 0.61 t/ha or 56.0%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen-phosphoric fertilizer with ekstrasol seed treatment increased productivity by 0.41 t/ha or 37.6% over control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
nitrogen-phosphoric fertilizers during seed treatment with ekstrasol in a dose of N12P50e0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
more thane0
Value
0.41 t/ha or 37.6%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of nitrogen-phosphoric fertilizers during seed treatment with ekstrasol in a dose of N12P50 is effective, productivity was more than in control by 0.41 t/ha or 37.6%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1191 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without risotorphine, tubercle bacteria were not formed.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
risotorphine was not applicatede0
Interactor
tubercle bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
tubercle bacteria were not formede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the options of experience where risotorphine was not applicated, tubercle bacteria were not formed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammophos was associated with soil phosphate accumulation to 19.7–19.8 mg/kg phosphoric acid at seed formation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
phase of seed formatione0
Treatment
Ammophose0
Outcome
accumulation of phosphatese0
Direction
accumulatione0
Value
19.7–19.8 mg/kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“Ammophos contributed to the accumulation of phosphates, in the phase of seed formation there were 19.7–19.8 mg/kg of phosphoric acid in the soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1440 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that N12 with P50 at sowing is low-cost and does not harm soil properties or pollute the environment in the north-west Rostov region.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
a system of fertilizer with a nitrogen starting dose of N12 together with phosphorus P50 during sowinge0
Setting
north-west zone of the Rostov regione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the north-west zone of the Rostov region a system of fertilizer with a nitrogen starting dose of N12 together with phosphorus P50 during sowing is low-cost, has not negative effect on properties and composition of southern chernozem and does not contribute to pollution of the natural environment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1741 · show in text ↑

ammonium dihydrogen phosphate · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

90 papers: 82 positive, 8 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

tillage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 79 positive, 18 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.