Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Number of pods per plant was significantly higher (42.65) under 100% RDF + 1.0 % MAP at 30 and 45 DAS.

A claim from Effect of Foliar Nutrition on Growth, Yield and Yield Attributes of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under Medium Black Calcareous Soil · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of pods per plant was significantly higher (42.65) under 100% RDF + 1.0 % MAP at 30 and 45 DAS.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100% RDF + 1.0 % (Mono Ammonium Phosphate) at 30 and 45 DASe1
Outcome
no. of pods per plante2
Direction
highere1
Value
42.65e2
Setting
medium black calcareous soile0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–97
e0

“under medium black calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–68
e1

“were recorded significantly higher under 100% RDF + 1.0 % (Mono Ammonium Phosphate) at 30 and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–820
e2

“no. of pods per plant (42.65)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–640

Title

Effect of Foliar Nutrition on Growth, Yield and Yield Attributes of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under Medium Black Calcareous Soil

J. J. Vaghani; D. R. Vala; R. V. Patel; et al. Asian Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 2024. doi:10.9734/ajsspn/2024/v10i3360

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e2a13f0b53719f4593661a6431f309be2a68e8e561bf2ecc277a1e2c117a6c3e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

ammonium dihydrogen phosphate · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

336 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.