Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Effect of Activated Charcoal on Growth, Yield, Quality and Disease Incidences of Parthenocarpic Hybrid Cucumber under Protected Condition

Ankeeta Anusmita Dalabehera; Samir Ebson Topno; Vijay Bahadur

11
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was carried out during the Rabi season 2023-2024 to investigate the effect of different levels of activated charcoal on the growth, yield, and quality of Parthenocarpic hybrid cucumber variety SFC-2125 (FITO) and to estimate the economics of crop. The research revealed that activated charcoal had significant effect on Treatment-5 (5g activated charcoal per plant) which performed best in terms of growth parameters with maximum Vine length 136.39 cm, number of nodes 17.52, maximum chlorophyll content 57.68, shortest duration for flowering 31.30 days and fruit setting 33.41 days, maximum number of female flower per plant (46.50), fruits per plant (37.67), fruit length(16.82cm) , number of fruit yield per plot 19.10 kg, and dry matter content (5.88%). The highest benefit cost ratio was at 3.86 in the same treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 5g activated charcoal per plant, cucumber vine length reached 136.39 cm.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
5g activated charcoal per plante0
Outcome
Vine lengthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
136.39 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment-5 (5g activated charcoal per plant) which performed best in terms of growth parameters with maximum Vine length 136.39 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 5g activated charcoal per plant, cucumber node number reached 17.52.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
5g activated charcoal per plante0
Outcome
number of nodese0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
17.52e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment-5 (5g activated charcoal per plant) which performed best in terms of growth parameters with maximum Vine length 136.39 cm, number of nodes 17.52”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–485 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 5g activated charcoal per plant, cucumber chlorophyll content reached 57.68.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
5g activated charcoal per plante0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
57.68e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment-5 (5g activated charcoal per plant) which performed best in terms of growth parameters with maximum Vine length 136.39 cm, number of nodes 17.52, maximum chlorophyll content 57.68”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–520 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 5g activated charcoal per plant, flowering occurred in 31.30 days.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
5g activated charcoal per plante0
Outcome
duration for floweringe0
Direction
shorteste0
Value
31.30 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment-5 (5g activated charcoal per plant) which performed best in terms of growth parameters with maximum Vine length 136.39 cm, number of nodes 17.52, maximum chlorophyll content 57.68, shortest duration for flowering 31.30 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–564 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 5g activated charcoal per plant, cucumber fruit setting occurred in 33.41 days.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
5g activated charcoal per plante1
Outcome
fruit settinge0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
33.41 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shortest duration for flowering 31.30 days and fruit setting 33.41 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment-5 (5g activated charcoal per plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–376 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 5g activated charcoal per plant, female flowers per cucumber plant reached 46.50.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
5g activated charcoal per plante1
Outcome
number of female flower per plante0
Direction
maximume0
Value
46.50e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum number of female flower per plant (46.50)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment-5 (5g activated charcoal per plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–376 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 5g activated charcoal per plant, cucumber fruits per plant reached 37.67.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
5g activated charcoal per plante1
Outcome
fruits per plante0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
37.67e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruits per plant (37.67)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment-5 (5g activated charcoal per plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–376 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 5g activated charcoal per plant, cucumber fruit length reached 16.82cm.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
5g activated charcoal per plante1
Outcome
fruit lengthe0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
16.82cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit length(16.82cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment-5 (5g activated charcoal per plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–376 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 5g activated charcoal per plant, cucumber fruit yield per plot reached 19.10 kg.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
5g activated charcoal per plante1
Outcome
fruit yield per plote0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
19.10 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of fruit yield per plot 19.10 kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–735 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment-5 (5g activated charcoal per plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–376 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 5g activated charcoal per plant, cucumber dry matter content reached 5.88%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
5g activated charcoal per plante1
Outcome
dry matter contente0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
5.88%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry matter content (5.88%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment-5 (5g activated charcoal per plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–376 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same activated charcoal treatment had the highest benefit cost ratio, 3.86.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.86e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest benefit cost ratio was at 3.86 in the same treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment-5 (5g activated charcoal per plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–376 · show in text ↑

charcoal · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.