Paper · 2024 · South African Journal of Botany

Effects of silica nanoparticles on morpho-histological and antioxidant activities of rice seedlings under drought stress

Sulaiman; Aziz Ahmad; Muhamad Fairus Noor Hassim

12
claims
40
verbatim quotes
26
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Drought has a direct impact on rice growth performance at various stages. Nevertheless, the impact of nanoparticles on the rice seedlings under drought stress remained limited. Thus, a laboratory experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of different concentrations (300, 600, and 900 mg/L) of silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) on morpho-histological and biochemical features of two rice varieties (UMT-R and MR219) under drought stress (15 % PEG). The findings indicated a substantial reduction due to drought stress in the growth, protein, and antioxidant enzymes, while increasing the proline , malondialdehyde (MDA), and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) content, and negatively affecting the root histology. Results showed that SiNPs at 600 mg/L were managed to improve plant growth, root vigour, and enzymatic antioxidant levels. Under SiNPs treated plants, among UMT-R and MR219, the proline (1.947 and 1.748 in leaves, 2.010 and 1.890 U/mg protein in roots), peroxidase (POD) (2.850 and 3.512 in leaves, 2.521 and 2.952 U/mg protein in roots), superoxide dismutase (SOD) (3.958 and 4.558 in leaves, 4.296 and 4.606 U/mg protein in roots), and catalase (CAT) (2.171 and 2.289 in leaves, 1.897 and 2.050 U/mg protein in roots) were higher than the drought stress conditions. Meanwhile, the nonenzymatic antioxidant, MDA (0.974 and 0.812 in leaves, 0.842 and 0.778 U/mg Protein in roots), and H 2 O 2 (1.378 and 1.229 in leaves, 1.280 and 1.054 U/mg Protein in roots) showed an opposite trend. SiNPs application noticeably enhanced the histological features of roots under drought conditions. The current findings suggested that SiNPs at 600 mg/L can mitigate the adverse impacts of drought stress and enhance the plant's resistance. Further study should be carried out on the reproductive stage and post-harvest performance of drought-stress rice treated with SiNPs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced rice seedling growth, protein, and antioxidant enzymes.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
growth, protein, and antioxidant enzymese0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a substantial reduction due to drought stress in the growth, protein, and antioxidant enzymes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–570 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased proline, malondialdehyde, and hydrogen peroxide content.

Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
proline , malondialdehyde (MDA), and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) contente0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing the proline , malondialdehyde (MDA), and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–666 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“due to drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought adversely affected root histology.

Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
root histologye0
Direction
negatively affectinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negatively affecting the root histology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“due to drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silica nanoparticles at 600 mg/L improved plant growth and root vigour.

Treatment
SiNPs at 600 mg/Le0
Outcome
plant growth, root vigoure0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SiNPs at 600 mg/L were managed to improve plant growth, root vigour, and enzymatic antioxidant levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silica nanoparticles at 600 mg/L improved enzymatic antioxidant levels.

Treatment
SiNPs at 600 mg/Le0
Outcome
enzymatic antioxidant levelse0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SiNPs at 600 mg/L were managed to improve plant growth, root vigour, and enzymatic antioxidant levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under nanoparticle treatment, proline was higher in leaves and roots of both varieties than under drought alone.

Material
UMT-R and MR219e1
Treatment
SiNPs treated plantse1
Outcome
prolinee0
Direction
highere3
Comparator
drought stress conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the proline (1.947 and 1.748 in leaves, 2.010 and 1.890 U/mg protein in roots)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–965 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“SiNPs treated plants, among UMT-R and MR219”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–885 · show in text ↑
e2

“drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1279 · show in text ↑
e3

“were higher than the drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under nanoparticle treatment, peroxidase was higher in leaves and roots of both varieties than under drought alone.

Material
UMT-R and MR219e1
Treatment
SiNPs treated plantse1
Outcome
peroxidase (POD)e0
Direction
highere3
Comparator
drought stress conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peroxidase (POD) (2.850 and 3.512 in leaves, 2.521 and 2.952 U/mg protein in roots)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“SiNPs treated plants, among UMT-R and MR219”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–885 · show in text ↑
e2

“drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1279 · show in text ↑
e3

“were higher than the drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under nanoparticle treatment, superoxide dismutase was higher in leaves and roots of both varieties than under drought alone.

Material
UMT-R and MR219e1
Treatment
SiNPs treated plantse1
Outcome
superoxide dismutase (SOD)e0
Direction
highere3
Comparator
drought stress conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“superoxide dismutase (SOD) (3.958 and 4.558 in leaves, 4.296 and 4.606 U/mg protein in roots)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“SiNPs treated plants, among UMT-R and MR219”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–885 · show in text ↑
e2

“drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1279 · show in text ↑
e3

“were higher than the drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under nanoparticle treatment, catalase was higher in leaves and roots of both varieties than under drought alone.

Material
UMT-R and MR219e1
Treatment
SiNPs treated plantse1
Outcome
catalase (CAT)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
drought stress conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“catalase (CAT) (2.171 and 2.289 in leaves, 1.897 and 2.050 U/mg protein in roots) were higher than the drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“SiNPs treated plants, among UMT-R and MR219”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under nanoparticle treatment, malondialdehyde showed the opposite trend to the higher antioxidants.

Material
UMT-R and MR219e1
Treatment
SiNPs treated plantse1
Outcome
MDAe0
Comparator
drought stress conditionse2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MDA (0.974 and 0.812 in leaves, 0.842 and 0.778 U/mg Protein in roots)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1392 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“SiNPs treated plants, among UMT-R and MR219”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–885 · show in text ↑
e2

“drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under nanoparticle treatment, hydrogen peroxide showed the opposite trend to the higher antioxidants.

Material
UMT-R and MR219e1
Treatment
SiNPs treated plantse1
Outcome
H 2 O 2e0
Comparator
drought stress conditionse2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“H 2 O 2 (1.378 and 1.229 in leaves, 1.280 and 1.054 U/mg Protein in roots) showed an opposite trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1497 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“SiNPs treated plants, among UMT-R and MR219”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–885 · show in text ↑
e2

“drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silica nanoparticles enhanced root histological features under drought.

Treatment
SiNPs applicatione0
Outcome
histological features of rootse0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
under drought conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SiNPs application noticeably enhanced the histological features of roots under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1596 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑

silicon dioxide nanoparticle · physiology: oxidative · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicon dioxide nanoparticle · physiology: osmolytes · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicon dioxide nanoparticle · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

34 papers: 24 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

55 papers: 10 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.