Paper · 2024 · E3S Web of Conferences

Theoretical justification of combined cropping of cotton and mung bean

Nilufar Ravshanova; Nasriddin Khalilov; Gulshoda Otayarova; et al.

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In this work, combined crops of mung bean and cotton were studied in the conditions of the Tashkent region, Kibray region. The work evaluates such indicators of combined crops of mungbean and cotton as the area and time equivalence coefficient (ATER), the aggressiveness of crops, as well as the influence on these indicators of different doses of fertilizers in combination with different maximum field humidity. The value of ATER, that is, the coefficient of equivalent area and time, depended on the sowing methods, plant density, and duration of the growing season. Aggressiveness in the combined sowing of mung bean and cotton was not significant. Analysis of the studies showed that the use of different doses of fertilizers and maximum field humidity did not affect the aggressiveness of mung bean and cotton crops in combined sowing. The results obtained show the possibility of using combined crops in the conditions of Uzbekistan.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The area and time equivalence coefficient (ATER) depended on sowing methods, plant density and duration of the growing season.

Taxon
mung bean and cottonGossypium hirsutumVigna radiatae5
Treatment
sowing methods, plant density, and duration of the growing seasone0
Outcome
ATERe0
Setting
Tashkent region, Kibray regione5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The value of ATER, that is, the coefficient of equivalent area and time, depended on the sowing methods, plant density, and duration of the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–568 · show in text ↑
e5

“combined crops of mung bean and cotton were studied in the conditions of the Tashkent region, Kibray region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aggressiveness in combined sowing of mung bean and cotton was not significant.

Taxon
mung bean and cottonGossypium hirsutumVigna radiatae1
Outcome
Aggressivenesse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Aggressiveness in the combined sowing of mung bean and cotton was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–651 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Different doses of fertilizers and maximum field humidity did not affect the aggressiveness of mung bean and cotton in combined sowing.

Taxon
mung bean and cottonGossypium hirsutumVigna radiatae2
Treatment
different doses of fertilizers and maximum field humiditye2
Outcome
aggressivenesse2
Direction
did not affecte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the use of different doses of fertilizers and maximum field humidity did not affect the aggressiveness of mung bean and cotton crops in combined sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–840 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The results show the possibility of using combined mung bean and cotton crops in the conditions of Uzbekistan.

Taxon
mung bean and cottonGossypium hirsutumVigna radiatae4
Outcome
using combined crops in the conditions of Uzbekistane3
Setting
Uzbekistane3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The results obtained show the possibility of using combined crops in the conditions of Uzbekistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–939 · show in text ↑
e4

“combined crops of mung bean and cotton were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–65 · show in text ↑

humidity · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · disease · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 13 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

humidity · disease · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.