Paper · 2013 · Soil and Sediment Contamination An International Journal

Can CO2Fertilization Enhance Phytoremediation of Organic Soil Contamination?

Xiaojun Diao; Liansheng He; Beidou Xi; et al.

10
claims
25
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Low efficiency is a key problem confronting the development and application of phytoremediation technology. Based on political pressure to reduce CO2 emissions in China and the fact that CO2 is necessary for plant photosynthesis, the effects of captured CO2 fertilization on phytoremediation of soil di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) pollution by C3 plant (mung bean, Vigna radiata L.) and C4 plant (maize, Zea mays L.) were investigated. Results showed that DEHP pollution negatively affected the growth and rhizosphere environments of both plants. After CO2 fertilization, both plants had more biomass (aboveground, belowground, and total dry weight), higher alkaline phosphatase activity, and more microbes with DEHP tolerance in their rhizospheres. Superoxide dismutase activity in leaves of both plants decreased significantly. Microbial community composition in both rhizospheres changed. CO2 fertilization also increased plant uptake of DEHP, particularly in the roots, and decreased residual DEHP concentrations in the rhizospheres. These effects were more evident in the C3 than in the C4 plant. This study indicated that CO2 fertilization can enhance the phytoremediation process of polluted soil through promoting plant growth, improving the rhizosphere environment, and increasing plant uptake of DEHP, particular in a C3 plant. CO2 fertilization could be considered as a measure to enhance phytoremediation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DEHP pollution harmed growth and rhizosphere conditions of mung bean and maize.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
DEHP pollutione0
Outcome
growth and rhizosphere environmentse0
Direction
negatively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DEHP pollution negatively affected the growth and rhizosphere environments of both plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–549 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean, Vigna radiata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–385 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 fertilization increased biomass of both plants.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
CO2 fertilizatione0
Outcome
biomass (aboveground, belowground, and total dry weight)e0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After CO2 fertilization, both plants had more biomass (aboveground, belowground, and total dry weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean, Vigna radiata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–385 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 fertilization increased rhizosphere alkaline phosphatase activity.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
CO2 fertilizationt1
Outcome
alkaline phosphatase activitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher alkaline phosphatase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–691 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean, Vigna radiata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–385 · show in text ↑
t1

“CO2 fertilization also increased plant uptake of DEHP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–949 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 fertilization increased DEHP-tolerant rhizosphere microbes.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
CO2 fertilizationt1
Outcome
microbes with DEHP tolerance in their rhizospherese0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more microbes with DEHP tolerance in their rhizospheres”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean, Vigna radiata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–385 · show in text ↑
t1

“CO2 fertilization also increased plant uptake of DEHP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–949 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 fertilization reduced leaf superoxide dismutase activity significantly.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
CO2 fertilizationt1
Outcome
Superoxide dismutase activitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Superoxide dismutase activity in leaves of both plants decreased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean, Vigna radiata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–385 · show in text ↑
t1

“CO2 fertilization also increased plant uptake of DEHP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–949 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 fertilization changed rhizosphere microbial community composition.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
CO2 fertilizationt1
Outcome
Microbial community composition in both rhizospherese0
Direction
changede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microbial community composition in both rhizospheres changed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean, Vigna radiata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–385 · show in text ↑
t1

“CO2 fertilization also increased plant uptake of DEHP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–949 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 fertilization increased plant DEHP uptake, particularly in roots.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
CO2 fertilizatione0
Outcome
plant uptake of DEHPe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO2 fertilization also increased plant uptake of DEHP, particularly in the roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean, Vigna radiata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–385 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 fertilization decreased residual rhizosphere DEHP.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
CO2 fertilizationt1
Outcome
residual DEHP concentrations in the rhizospherese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased residual DEHP concentrations in the rhizospheres”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean, Vigna radiata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–385 · show in text ↑
t1

“CO2 fertilization also increased plant uptake of DEHP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–949 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 fertilization effects were more evident in the C3 plant than the C4 plant.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
These effectse0
Direction
more evidente0
Comparator
C4 plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These effects were more evident in the C3 than in the C4 plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean, Vigna radiata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–385 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend CO2 fertilization to enhance phytoremediation.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
measure to enhance phytoremediatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO2 fertilization could be considered as a measure to enhance phytoremediation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1420 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean, Vigna radiata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–385 · show in text ↑

co2 · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

co2 · molecular: metabolites · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · disease · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

co2 · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 76 positive, 3 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.