Paper · 2024 · UKRAINIAN BLACK SEA REGION AGRARIAN SCIENCE

Efficiency of biological products and mineral fertilizers application on winter garlic crops in the conditions of the Right-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine

Natalia Ostapenko

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The article presents the results of three years of research on the effectiveness of the influence of the biological product Phytohelp, mineral fertiliser Drip Fert N15P5K30+МЕ and bioadhesive Liposam on the structure of the winter garlic yield of the Lyubasha variety under drip irrigation. The relevance of the research is due to the search for new approaches to the development of technological methods for growing winter garlic, taking into account the specific conditions of unstable moisture in the Forest-Steppe. The purpose of the article is to establish the optimal doses and the ratio between them to achieve an increase in the quality and yield of winter garlic. The study was conducted on the experimental field of the Department of Vegetable Growing of the National Assessed Contribution of Ukraine of the Uman National University of Horticulture on podzolised heavy loamy black soil in 2017-2019. As a result, it was proved that in the conditions of the Right-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine on podzolic chernozem under drip irrigation, a higher yield was obtained in plots with the combined use of the biological product Phytohelp at a rate of 1-2 l/ha, mineral fertiliser Drip Fert N15P5K30+МЕ and bioadhesive Liposam at a rate of 1 l/ha. This resulted in an increase of 9.0-10.6 t/ha compared to the control variant, respectively. Using the biopreparation Phytohelp and bioadhesive Liposam at a rate of 2/1 and 1/1 l/ha, a yield of 16.6-17.1 t/ha was obtained, where the increase to the control was 7.7-8.2 t/ha. The effect of foliar fertilisation with Drip Fert N15P5K30+ME (4 g/2 l of water or 0.5 c/ha) on the yield of winter garlic was determined. The increase to the control was 1.6%. The results of this study may be useful for agricultural enterprises and farmers who grow garlic and other crops

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Phytohelp, Drip Fert and Liposam produced higher winter garlic yield than control under drip irrigation.

Taxon
winter garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
combined use of the biological product Phytohelp at a rate of 1-2 l/ha, mineral fertiliser Drip Fert N15P5K30+МЕ and bioadhesive Liposam at a rate of 1 l/hae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
9.0-10.6 t/hae0
Comparator
control variante0

Not reportedMaterialSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a higher yield was obtained in plots with the combined use of the biological product Phytohelp at a rate of 1-2 l/ha, mineral fertiliser Drip Fert N15P5K30+МЕ and bioadhesive Liposam at a rate of 1 l/ha. This resulted in an increase of 9.0-10.6 t/ha compared to the control variant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter garlic crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytohelp and Liposam at the stated rates yielded 16.6-17.1 t/ha, an increase of 7.7-8.2 t/ha over control.

Taxon
winter garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
biopreparation Phytohelp and bioadhesive Liposam at a rate of 2/1 and 1/1 l/hae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
7.7-8.2 t/hae0
Qualifier
16.6-17.1 t/hae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using the biopreparation Phytohelp and bioadhesive Liposam at a rate of 2/1 and 1/1 l/ha, a yield of 16.6-17.1 t/ha was obtained, where the increase to the control was 7.7-8.2 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1525 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter garlic crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Drip Fert increased winter garlic yield by 1.6% relative to control.

Taxon
winter garlicAllium sativume0
Treatment
foliar fertilisation with Drip Fert N15P5K30+ME (4 g/2 l of water or 0.5 c/ha)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
1.6%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of foliar fertilisation with Drip Fert N15P5K30+ME (4 g/2 l of water or 0.5 c/ha) on the yield of winter garlic was determined. The increase to the control was 1.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1702 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results differ

166 papers: 155 positive, 11 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

irrigation · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 28 positive, 9 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

application · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 58 positive, 1 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.