Paper · 2024 · Ecology Environment and Conservation

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Yield Attributes and Yield of Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)

Stella Anni Shaju; Abhinandan Singh; Aakash Malik

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This experiment was carried out in Randomized block design with Three replication and 10 treatments combination at Crop Research Centre-II, ITM University, Gwalior (M.P) During the Rabi season of 2022-23 entitled "Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on growth, yield attribute and yield of lentil" (Lens culinaris.L)".The treatments consist of T 1 -Control, T 2 -100% RDF (20:40:0 NPK), T 3 -75% RDF + Vermicompost @2.5t/ha, T 4 -75% RDF + Rhizobium, T 5 -75% RDF + PSB, T 6 -75% RDF + Rhizobium + PSB, T 7 -50% RDF + Vermicompost @2.5t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB, T 8 -75% RDF + Vermicompost @ 1.5t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB, T 9 -100% RDF + Vermicompost @ 1t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB.T 10 -125% RDF +vermicompost @ 0.5t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB. and each treatment were replicated thrice.and seeds were treated with Rhizobium and PSB.The INM practices Significantly affected the yield and yield attributes parameters like no. of pods /plant, pod length (cm), no of grains/pods, 1000 seed weight, grain yield (kg/ ha), stalk yield (kg/ha), biological yield(kg/ha) and harvest index (%) was recorded under the treatment (T 10 -125% RDF + vermicompost @ 0.5t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB) but it was at par with (T 9 -100%RDF +vermicompost @1t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB), (T 8 -75%RDF + vermicompost @1.5t/ha + Rhizobium +PSB) and at par with rest of the treatments.and minimum yield parameters was recorded under control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The T10 nutrient-management treatment significantly affected no. of pods /plant in lentil, with the minimum yield parameters under control.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
T 10 -125% RDF + vermicompost @ 0.5t/ha + Rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
no. of pods /plante0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The INM practices Significantly affected the yield and yield attributes parameters like no. of pods /plant, pod length (cm), no of grains/pods, 1000 seed weight, grain yield (kg/ ha), stalk yield (kg/ha), biological yield(kg/ha) and harvest index (%) was recorded under the treatment (T 10 -125% RDF + vermicompost @ 0.5t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB) but it was at par with (T 9 -100%RDF +vermicompost @1t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB), (T 8 -75%RDF + vermicompost @1.5t/ha + Rhizobium +PSB) and at par with rest of the treatments.and minimum yield parameters was recorded under control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1394 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The T10 nutrient-management treatment significantly affected pod length (cm) in lentil, with the minimum yield parameters under control.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
T 10 -125% RDF + vermicompost @ 0.5t/ha + Rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
pod length (cm)e0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The INM practices Significantly affected the yield and yield attributes parameters like no. of pods /plant, pod length (cm), no of grains/pods, 1000 seed weight, grain yield (kg/ ha), stalk yield (kg/ha), biological yield(kg/ha) and harvest index (%) was recorded under the treatment (T 10 -125% RDF + vermicompost @ 0.5t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB) but it was at par with (T 9 -100%RDF +vermicompost @1t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB), (T 8 -75%RDF + vermicompost @1.5t/ha + Rhizobium +PSB) and at par with rest of the treatments.and minimum yield parameters was recorded under control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1394 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The T10 nutrient-management treatment significantly affected no of grains/pods in lentil, with the minimum yield parameters under control.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
T 10 -125% RDF + vermicompost @ 0.5t/ha + Rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
no of grains/podse0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The INM practices Significantly affected the yield and yield attributes parameters like no. of pods /plant, pod length (cm), no of grains/pods, 1000 seed weight, grain yield (kg/ ha), stalk yield (kg/ha), biological yield(kg/ha) and harvest index (%) was recorded under the treatment (T 10 -125% RDF + vermicompost @ 0.5t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB) but it was at par with (T 9 -100%RDF +vermicompost @1t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB), (T 8 -75%RDF + vermicompost @1.5t/ha + Rhizobium +PSB) and at par with rest of the treatments.and minimum yield parameters was recorded under control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1394 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The T10 nutrient-management treatment significantly affected 1000 seed weight in lentil, with the minimum yield parameters under control.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
T 10 -125% RDF + vermicompost @ 0.5t/ha + Rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
1000 seed weighte0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The INM practices Significantly affected the yield and yield attributes parameters like no. of pods /plant, pod length (cm), no of grains/pods, 1000 seed weight, grain yield (kg/ ha), stalk yield (kg/ha), biological yield(kg/ha) and harvest index (%) was recorded under the treatment (T 10 -125% RDF + vermicompost @ 0.5t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB) but it was at par with (T 9 -100%RDF +vermicompost @1t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB), (T 8 -75%RDF + vermicompost @1.5t/ha + Rhizobium +PSB) and at par with rest of the treatments.and minimum yield parameters was recorded under control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1394 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The T10 nutrient-management treatment significantly affected grain yield (kg/ ha) in lentil, with the minimum yield parameters under control.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
T 10 -125% RDF + vermicompost @ 0.5t/ha + Rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
grain yield (kg/ ha)e0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The INM practices Significantly affected the yield and yield attributes parameters like no. of pods /plant, pod length (cm), no of grains/pods, 1000 seed weight, grain yield (kg/ ha), stalk yield (kg/ha), biological yield(kg/ha) and harvest index (%) was recorded under the treatment (T 10 -125% RDF + vermicompost @ 0.5t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB) but it was at par with (T 9 -100%RDF +vermicompost @1t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB), (T 8 -75%RDF + vermicompost @1.5t/ha + Rhizobium +PSB) and at par with rest of the treatments.and minimum yield parameters was recorded under control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1394 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The T10 nutrient-management treatment significantly affected stalk yield (kg/ha) in lentil, with the minimum yield parameters under control.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
T 10 -125% RDF + vermicompost @ 0.5t/ha + Rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
stalk yield (kg/ha)e0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The INM practices Significantly affected the yield and yield attributes parameters like no. of pods /plant, pod length (cm), no of grains/pods, 1000 seed weight, grain yield (kg/ ha), stalk yield (kg/ha), biological yield(kg/ha) and harvest index (%) was recorded under the treatment (T 10 -125% RDF + vermicompost @ 0.5t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB) but it was at par with (T 9 -100%RDF +vermicompost @1t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB), (T 8 -75%RDF + vermicompost @1.5t/ha + Rhizobium +PSB) and at par with rest of the treatments.and minimum yield parameters was recorded under control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1394 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The T10 nutrient-management treatment significantly affected biological yield(kg/ha) in lentil, with the minimum yield parameters under control.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
T 10 -125% RDF + vermicompost @ 0.5t/ha + Rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
biological yield(kg/ha)e0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The INM practices Significantly affected the yield and yield attributes parameters like no. of pods /plant, pod length (cm), no of grains/pods, 1000 seed weight, grain yield (kg/ ha), stalk yield (kg/ha), biological yield(kg/ha) and harvest index (%) was recorded under the treatment (T 10 -125% RDF + vermicompost @ 0.5t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB) but it was at par with (T 9 -100%RDF +vermicompost @1t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB), (T 8 -75%RDF + vermicompost @1.5t/ha + Rhizobium +PSB) and at par with rest of the treatments.and minimum yield parameters was recorded under control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1394 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The T10 nutrient-management treatment significantly affected harvest index (%) in lentil, with the minimum yield parameters under control.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
T 10 -125% RDF + vermicompost @ 0.5t/ha + Rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
harvest index (%)e0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The INM practices Significantly affected the yield and yield attributes parameters like no. of pods /plant, pod length (cm), no of grains/pods, 1000 seed weight, grain yield (kg/ ha), stalk yield (kg/ha), biological yield(kg/ha) and harvest index (%) was recorded under the treatment (T 10 -125% RDF + vermicompost @ 0.5t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB) but it was at par with (T 9 -100%RDF +vermicompost @1t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB), (T 8 -75%RDF + vermicompost @1.5t/ha + Rhizobium +PSB) and at par with rest of the treatments.and minimum yield parameters was recorded under control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1394 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–100 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

40 papers: 40 positive, 0 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

99 papers: 86 positive, 13 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.