Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The T10 nutrient-management treatment significantly affected biological yield(kg/ha) in lentil, with the minimum yield parameters under control.

A claim from Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Yield Attributes and Yield of Lentil (Lens culinaris L.) · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The T10 nutrient-management treatment significantly affected biological yield(kg/ha) in lentil, with the minimum yield parameters under control.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
T 10 -125% RDF + vermicompost @ 0.5t/ha + Rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
biological yield(kg/ha)e0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The INM practices Significantly affected the yield and yield attributes parameters like no. of pods /plant, pod length (cm), no of grains/pods, 1000 seed weight, grain yield (kg/ ha), stalk yield (kg/ha), biological yield(kg/ha) and harvest index (%) was recorded under the treatment (T 10 -125% RDF + vermicompost @ 0.5t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB) but it was at par with (T 9 -100%RDF +vermicompost @1t/ha + Rhizobium + PSB), (T 8 -75%RDF + vermicompost @1.5t/ha + Rhizobium +PSB) and at par with rest of the treatments.and minimum yield parameters was recorded under control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1394
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–100

Title

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Yield Attributes and Yield of Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)

Stella Anni Shaju; Abhinandan Singh; Aakash Malik Ecology Environment and Conservation 2024. doi:10.53550/eec.2024.v30i01.032

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-31198cba3e1ebeecfb72429de8e6f0a3fdabc5c4ae8296bc041d8157adbdf484 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

40 papers: 40 positive, 0 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

99 papers: 86 positive, 13 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

90 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.