Abstract
The investigation was carried out during the fruit pruning season 2022-23 on 6-year-old vine of Crimson Seedless at ICAR- National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune. The vines were grafted on four different rootstocks (Dogridge, 110R, 140Ru and 1103P). The vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock recorded high TSS, lowest acidity and high TSS: Acidity ratio. 110R rootstocks had lowest berry firmness and skin thickness. 110R rootstock showed better results in organoleptic quality such as color, sweetness, taste, mouthfeel, flavor and overall acceptability as compared to other rootstocks. Rootstocks 110R recorded lowest rate of rachis dehydration and minimum physiological weight loss from bunches on different days of the shelf life. The vine grafted on Dogridge and 140Ru grafted vines recorded least rotten berries while 140Ru had the lowest number of fallen berries during shelf life. In conclusion, Crimson Seedless vines on 110R rootstock enhance shelf life and sensory quality of grapes, but terms of fresh grape quality Dogridge show better results.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Dogridge rootstock gave high TSS in Crimson Seedless grapes.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“crimson seedless grapes”
e1“The vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock recorded high TSS, lowest acidity and high TSS: Acidity ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
Dogridge rootstock gave the lowest acidity in Crimson Seedless grapes.
- Taxon
- grapest0
- Material
- crimson seedlesst0
- Treatment
- Dogridge rootstocke1
- Outcome
- aciditye1
- Direction
- loweste1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“crimson seedless grapes”
e1“The vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock recorded high TSS, lowest acidity and high TSS: Acidity ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
Dogridge rootstock gave high TSS: acidity ratio in Crimson Seedless grapes.
- Taxon
- grapest0
- Material
- crimson seedlesst0
- Treatment
- Dogridge rootstocke1
- Outcome
- TSS: Acidity ratioe1
- Direction
- highe1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“crimson seedless grapes”
e1“The vines grafted on Dogridge rootstock recorded high TSS, lowest acidity and high TSS: Acidity ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
110R rootstock gave the lowest berry firmness and skin thickness in Crimson Seedless grapes.
- Taxon
- grapest0
- Material
- crimson seedlesst0
- Treatment
- 110R rootstockse2
- Outcome
- berry firmness and skin thicknesse2
- Direction
- loweste2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“crimson seedless grapes”
e2“110R rootstocks had lowest berry firmness and skin thickness”
Claim · model-written summary
110R rootstock gave better color, sweetness and taste than other rootstocks.
Verbatim
t0“crimson seedless grapes”
e3“110R rootstock showed better results in organoleptic quality such as color, sweetness, taste, mouthfeel, flavor and overall acceptability as compared to other rootstocks”
Claim · model-written summary
110R rootstock gave better mouthfeel, flavor and overall acceptability than other rootstocks.
Verbatim
t0“crimson seedless grapes”
e3“110R rootstock showed better results in organoleptic quality such as color, sweetness, taste, mouthfeel, flavor and overall acceptability as compared to other rootstocks”
Claim · model-written summary
110R rootstock gave the lowest rate of rachis dehydration during shelf life.
- Taxon
- grapest0
- Material
- crimson seedlesst0
- Treatment
- Rootstocks 110Re4
- Outcome
- rate of rachis dehydratione4
- Direction
- loweste4
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“crimson seedless grapes”
e4“Rootstocks 110R recorded lowest rate of rachis dehydration and minimum physiological weight loss from bunches on different days of the shelf life”
Claim · model-written summary
110R rootstock gave the minimum physiological weight loss from bunches during shelf life.
- Taxon
- grapest0
- Material
- crimson seedlesst0
- Treatment
- Rootstocks 110Re4
- Outcome
- physiological weight loss from bunchese4
- Direction
- minimume4
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“crimson seedless grapes”
e4“Rootstocks 110R recorded lowest rate of rachis dehydration and minimum physiological weight loss from bunches on different days of the shelf life”
Claim · model-written summary
Dogridge rootstock gave the least rotten berries during shelf life.
- Taxon
- grapest0
- Material
- crimson seedlesst0
- Treatment
- grafted on Dogridgee5
- Outcome
- rotten berriese5
- Direction
- leaste5
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“crimson seedless grapes”
e5“The vine grafted on Dogridge and 140Ru grafted vines recorded least rotten berries while 140Ru had the lowest number of fallen berries during shelf life”
Claim · model-written summary
140Ru rootstock gave the least rotten berries during shelf life.
- Taxon
- grapest0
- Material
- crimson seedlesst0
- Treatment
- 140Ru grafted vinese5
- Outcome
- rotten berriese5
- Direction
- leaste5
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“crimson seedless grapes”
e5“The vine grafted on Dogridge and 140Ru grafted vines recorded least rotten berries while 140Ru had the lowest number of fallen berries during shelf life”
Claim · model-written summary
140Ru rootstock gave the lowest number of fallen berries during shelf life.
- Taxon
- grapest0
- Material
- crimson seedlesst0
- Treatment
- 140Rue5
- Outcome
- number of fallen berriese5
- Direction
- loweste5
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“crimson seedless grapes”
e5“The vine grafted on Dogridge and 140Ru grafted vines recorded least rotten berries while 140Ru had the lowest number of fallen berries during shelf life”
The same questions in other papers
grafting · quality: postharvest · VitisPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
grafting · quality: sugar starch · VitisPositive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.