Paper · 2024 · Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Biotechnology

Improving Yield of Cotton Plant by Bacillus Species as Biocontrol Agents for Damping-off Disease

Aida Afify; A. Ashour

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Four Bacillus spp. were isolated from rhizosphere soil of cotton seedlings and identified as Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus sp., Bacillus sp. and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Bacillus isolates exhibited antagonistic activities against Fusarium oxysporum and Rhizoctonia solani which were isolated from roots of cotton seedlings showing damping-off symptoms. Greenhouse and field experiments with artificially and naturally infected soils with R. solani and F. oxysporum were carried out. Seeds of cotton (Giza 89) treated with the antagonistic bacteria (four Bacillus spp.) just before sowing were cultivated. Untreated seeds were involved as a control. In greenhouse experiment, the antagonistic B. subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens significantly repressed the disease incidence to the lowest values in both seasons (2022 and 2023) as compared to the untreated control. Also, under field conditions the same Bacillus isolates significantly decreased the disease incidence. Finally, the application of B. subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens as bio-controllar significantly increased seed cotton yield. Thus, these bacterial bio-controlling agents could be recommended for association in integrated control system of damping-off fungi in cotton and improving quality of cotton yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four Bacillus isolates were identified from cotton seedling rhizosphere soil.

Interactor
Bacillus spp.e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Four Bacillus spp. were isolated from rhizosphere soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four Bacillus spp. were isolated from rhizosphere soil of cotton seedlings and identified as Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus sp., Bacillus sp. and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–169 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus isolates antagonized Fusarium oxysporum.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacilluse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
antagonistic activities against Fusarium oxysporume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus isolates exhibited antagonistic activities against Fusarium oxysporum and Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus isolates antagonized Rhizoctonia solani.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacilluse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
antagonistic activities against Fusarium oxysporum and Rhizoctonia solanie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus isolates exhibited antagonistic activities against Fusarium oxysporum and Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis treatment significantly reduced cotton damping-off incidence in greenhouse experiments.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
B. subtilise0
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
repressede0
Comparator
untreated controle0
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In greenhouse experiment, the antagonistic B. subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens significantly repressed the disease incidence to the lowest values in both seasons (2022 and 2023) as compared to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. amyloliquefaciens treatment significantly reduced cotton damping-off incidence in greenhouse experiments.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
B. amyloliquefaciense0
Interactor
B. amyloliquefaciensBacillus amyloliquefaciense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
repressede0
Comparator
untreated controle0
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In greenhouse experiment, the antagonistic B. subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens significantly repressed the disease incidence to the lowest values in both seasons (2022 and 2023) as compared to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis significantly decreased field disease incidence.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
B. subtilise0
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens significantly repressed the disease incidence to the lowest values in both seasons (2022 and 2023) as compared to the untreated control. Also, under field conditions the same Bacillus isolates significantly decreased the disease incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant by Bacillus Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. amyloliquefaciens significantly decreased field disease incidence.

Taxon
Cotton PlantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
B. amyloliquefaciense0
Interactor
B. amyloliquefaciensBacillus amyloliquefaciense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens significantly repressed the disease incidence to the lowest values in both seasons (2022 and 2023) as compared to the untreated control. Also, under field conditions the same Bacillus isolates significantly decreased the disease incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plant by Bacillus Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis significantly increased seed cotton yield.

Treatment
B. subtilise0
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of B. subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens as bio-controllar significantly increased seed cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1094 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. amyloliquefaciens significantly increased seed cotton yield.

Treatment
B. amyloliquefaciense0
Interactor
B. amyloliquefaciensBacillus amyloliquefaciense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of B. subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens as bio-controllar significantly increased seed cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1094 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the Bacillus agents for integrated control of cotton damping-off.

Outcome
association in integrated control system of damping-off fungi in cotton and improving quality of cotton yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these bacterial bio-controlling agents could be recommended for association in integrated control system of damping-off fungi in cotton and improving quality of cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1275 · show in text ↑

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.