Paper · 2013 · Journal of Biopesticides

INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT OF SESAME DISEASES

C Jeyalakshmi; C Rettinassababady; Sushma Nema

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Field trials conducted on integrated disease management practices to combat major diseases and to increase the seed yield of sesame during summer 2009 and 2010 revealed that soil application of neem cake (250 kg/ha) along with seed treatment and soil application (2.5 kg/ha) of Trichoderma viride followed by foliar spray of azadirachtin @ 3 mL/L on 30 and 45 DAS (Module 3) was found to be significantly effective by recording minimum disease incidence coupled with maximum seed yield with higher cost benefit (C:B) ratio. Though module M2 and M1 ranked next to M3 with statistically on par in reducing the diseases, the module M2 consists of seed treatment and soil application (2.5 kg/ha) of T. viride followed by foliar spray of mancozeb (0.25%) + endosulfan (0.07%) on 30 and 45 DAS significantly different from M1 by recording seed yield and C: B ratio. All the modules were superior over farmer’s practices (without any treatment)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Module 3 gave the minimum disease incidence.

Treatment
soil application of neem cake (250 kg/ha) along with seed treatment and soil application (2.5 kg/ha) of Trichoderma viride followed by foliar spray of azadirachtin @ 3 mL/Le1
Outcome
minimum disease incidencee1
Direction
minimume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SESAME”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil application of neem cake (250 kg/ha) along with seed treatment and soil application (2.5 kg/ha) of Trichoderma viride followed by foliar spray of azadirachtin @ 3 mL/L on 30 and 45 DAS (Module 3) was found to be significantly effective by recording minimum disease incidence coupled with maximum seed yield with higher cost benefit (C:B) ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Module 3 gave the maximum seed yield.

Treatment
soil application of neem cake (250 kg/ha) along with seed treatment and soil application (2.5 kg/ha) of Trichoderma viride followed by foliar spray of azadirachtin @ 3 mL/Le1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
maximume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SESAME”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil application of neem cake (250 kg/ha) along with seed treatment and soil application (2.5 kg/ha) of Trichoderma viride followed by foliar spray of azadirachtin @ 3 mL/L on 30 and 45 DAS (Module 3) was found to be significantly effective by recording minimum disease incidence coupled with maximum seed yield with higher cost benefit (C:B) ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Module 3 gave a higher cost benefit (C:B) ratio.

Treatment
soil application of neem cake (250 kg/ha) along with seed treatment and soil application (2.5 kg/ha) of Trichoderma viride followed by foliar spray of azadirachtin @ 3 mL/Le1
Outcome
cost benefit (C:B) ratioe1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SESAME”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil application of neem cake (250 kg/ha) along with seed treatment and soil application (2.5 kg/ha) of Trichoderma viride followed by foliar spray of azadirachtin @ 3 mL/L on 30 and 45 DAS (Module 3) was found to be significantly effective by recording minimum disease incidence coupled with maximum seed yield with higher cost benefit (C:B) ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Modules M2 and M1 were statistically on par with M3 in reducing diseases.

Treatment
module M2 and M1e1
Outcome
reducing the diseasese1
Direction
on pare1
Comparator
M3e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SESAME”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“Though module M2 and M1 ranked next to M3 with statistically on par in reducing the diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Module M2 differed significantly from M1 in seed yield and C:B ratio.

Treatment
seed treatment and soil application (2.5 kg/ha) of T. viride followed by foliar spray of mancozeb (0.25%) + endosulfan (0.07%)e1
Outcome
seed yield and C: B ratioe1
Comparator
M1e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SESAME”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“the module M2 consists of seed treatment and soil application (2.5 kg/ha) of T. viride followed by foliar spray of mancozeb (0.25%) + endosulfan (0.07%) on 30 and 45 DAS significantly different from M1 by recording seed yield and C: B ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–867 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All modules were superior to farmer practice without any treatment.

Treatment
All the modulese1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
without any treatmente1

Not reportedOutcome

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SESAME”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“All the modules were superior over farmer’s practices (without any treatment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–946 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma viride · disease · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

azadirachtin · disease · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Trichoderma viride · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

application · disease · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

botanical · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

application · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

92 papers: 89 positive, 3 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.