Abstract
Sesame, Sesamum indicum Linn. is a major oilseed crop of India, including Bundelkhand Zone of Madhya Pradesh. One of the major constraints in its production is damage caused by insect pests, particularly sucking which suck the cell sap from leaves, flower and pods. Efficacy of some indigenous neem products, insecticides and their admixtures against three sucking pests (jassid, mired bug and white fly) of sesame were tested at Research Farm of College of Agriculture, Tikamgarh (Madhya Pradesh) during kharif 2004-2006. The results revealed that incidence of nymph and adult population of sucking pests, viz. jassid, Orosius albicinctus (Distant), mirid bug, Nesidiocoris tenuis (Rent.) and whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) was decreased significantly by natural and indigenous products, viz. Neem oil (NO), Neem seed kernel extract (NSKE), Neem leaf extract (NLE), Garlic bud + Red pepper extract (GB + RPE), Cow urine (CU) and Cow butter milk (CBM) as compared to untreated. However, insecticide Endosulfan was more effective than these products. The efficacy of all the above products were in the following order: Endosulfan > NSKE > NO > NLE > GB + RPE > CU > CBM. Grain yield was significantly higher in all the treatments as compared to untreated but was maximum with Endosulfan 0.07% (622 kg/ha) followed by NSKE-30 ml/l (605 kg/ha). Whereas, net profit and incremental cost benefit ratio (ICBR) was maximum with NSKE followed by NO in net profit and ICBR in NLE.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Natural and indigenous neem and cow products significantly decreased nymph and adult populations of sucking pests on sesame compared with untreated plots.
- Taxon
- Sesame
Sesamum indicumt0 - Treatment
- natural and indigenous productse1
- Interactor
- sucking pestse1pest
- Outcome
- incidence of nymph and adult populatione1
- Direction
- decreasede1
- Comparator
- untreatede1
- Setting
- Research Farm of College of Agriculture, Tikamgarh (Madhya Pradesh)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sucking pests of Sesame”
e0“Efficacy of some indigenous neem products, insecticides and their admixtures against three sucking pests (jassid, mired bug and white fly) of sesame were tested at Research Farm of College of Agriculture, Tikamgarh (Madhya Pradesh) during kharif 2004-2006”
e1“The results revealed that incidence of nymph and adult population of sucking pests, viz. jassid, Orosius albicinctus (Distant), mirid bug, Nesidiocoris tenuis (Rent.) and whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) was decreased significantly by natural and indigenous products, viz. Neem oil (NO), Neem seed kernel extract (NSKE), Neem leaf extract (NLE), Garlic bud + Red pepper extract (GB + RPE), Cow urine (CU) and Cow butter milk (CBM) as compared to untreated”
Claim · model-written summary
Insecticide Endosulfan was more effective against sucking pests on sesame than the natural and indigenous products.
- Taxon
- SesameSesamum indicumt0
- Treatment
- insecticide Endosulfane2
- Outcome
- effectivee2
- Direction
- more effectivee2
- Comparator
- these productse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sucking pests of Sesame”
e2“However, insecticide Endosulfan was more effective than these products”
Claim · model-written summary
The efficacy of the sesame sucking-pest control products followed the order Endosulfan > NSKE > NO > NLE > GB + RPE > CU > CBM.
- Taxon
- SesameSesamum indicumt0
- Outcome
- efficacye3
- Qualifier
- in the following order: Endosulfan > NSKE > NO > NLE > GB + RPE > CU > CBMe3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sucking pests of Sesame”
e3“The efficacy of all the above products were in the following order: Endosulfan > NSKE > NO > NLE > GB + RPE > CU > CBM”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield of sesame was significantly higher in all treatments than in untreated plots.
- Taxon
- SesameSesamum indicumt0
- Treatment
- all the treatmentse4
- Outcome
- Grain yielde4
- Direction
- highere4
- Comparator
- untreatede4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sucking pests of Sesame”
e4“Grain yield was significantly higher in all the treatments as compared to untreated but was maximum with Endosulfan 0.07% (622 kg/ha) followed by NSKE-30 ml/l (605 kg/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield was maximum with Endosulfan 0.07% (622 kg/ha).
- Taxon
- SesameSesamum indicumt0
- Treatment
- Endosulfan 0.07%e4
- Outcome
- Grain yielde4
- Direction
- maximume4
- Value
- 622 kg/hae4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sucking pests of Sesame”
e4“Grain yield was significantly higher in all the treatments as compared to untreated but was maximum with Endosulfan 0.07% (622 kg/ha) followed by NSKE-30 ml/l (605 kg/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield with NSKE-30 ml/l (605 kg/ha) was second to Endosulfan 0.07%.
- Taxon
- SesameSesamum indicumt0
- Treatment
- NSKE-30 ml/le4
- Outcome
- Grain yielde4
- Direction
- lowerinferrede4
- Value
- 605 kg/hae4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sucking pests of Sesame”
e4“Grain yield was significantly higher in all the treatments as compared to untreated but was maximum with Endosulfan 0.07% (622 kg/ha) followed by NSKE-30 ml/l (605 kg/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Net profit was maximum with NSKE among the sesame sucking-pest control treatments.
- Taxon
- SesameSesamum indicumt0
- Treatment
- NSKEe5
- Outcome
- net profite5
- Direction
- maximume5
- Qualifier
- followed by NO in net profit and ICBR in NLEe5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sucking pests of Sesame”
e5“Whereas, net profit and incremental cost benefit ratio (ICBR) was maximum with NSKE followed by NO in net profit and ICBR in NLE”
Claim · model-written summary
Incremental cost benefit ratio (ICBR) was maximum with NSKE among the sesame sucking-pest control treatments.
- Taxon
- SesameSesamum indicumt0
- Treatment
- NSKEe5
- Outcome
- incremental cost benefit ratio (ICBR)e5
- Direction
- maximume5
- Qualifier
- followed by NO in net profit and ICBR in NLEe5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sucking pests of Sesame”
e5“Whereas, net profit and incremental cost benefit ratio (ICBR) was maximum with NSKE followed by NO in net profit and ICBR in NLE”
The same questions in other papers
Azadirachta indica · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
botanical · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.