Paper · 2024 · Environment and Ecology

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Quality of Fodder Oats (Avena sativa (L.))

Sunita .; R.C. Bairwa; S.R. Bhunia; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Instructional Farm College of Agriculture, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner during rabi 2019- 2020 entitled the “Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield and quality of fodder oats (Avena sativa L.)”. Fourteen INM treatment viz.,100 % RDF, 100% RDF + FYM @ 20.0 t ha–1, 100 % RDF + PSB, 100% RDF + PSB + ZnSO4 @ 12.5 kg ha–1, 75% RDF, 75% RDF + Vermicompost @ 5.0 t ha–1, 75% RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha–1, 75% RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha–1 + PSB, 75% RDF +Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha–1 + ZnSO4 @12.5 kg ha–1, 75% RDF + FYM @ 20.0 t ha–1, 75% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha–1, 75% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha–1 + PSB, 75% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha–1 + PSB + ZnSO4 @ 12.5 kg/ha, Control (untreated) were laid out in Randomized Block Design with three replications. The results revealed that application of all treatments were significant increased N, P and Zn content and uptake and crude protein in fodder oats also enhanced with application of 75% RDF + FYM @ 10 t ha–1 + PSB + ZnSO4 @ 12.5 kg ha–1. But significantly highest crude fiber content was recorded under control and lowest with application of 75% RDF + FYM @ 10 t ha–1 + PSB + ZnSO4 @ 12.5 kg ha–1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied nutrient treatments significantly increased nitrogen, phosphorus, and zinc content in fodder oats.

Taxon
Fodder Oatst0
Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
N, P and Zn contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of all treatments were significant increased N, P and Zn content and uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–938 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Oats (Avena sativa (L.))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied nutrient treatments significantly increased nitrogen, phosphorus, and zinc uptake in fodder oats.

Taxon
Fodder Oatst0
Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
N, P and Zn content and uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of all treatments were significant increased N, P and Zn content and uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–938 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Oats (Avena sativa (L.))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified 75% RDF mixture enhanced crude protein in fodder oats.

Taxon
fodder oatse0
Treatment
75% RDF + FYM @ 10 t ha–1 + PSB + ZnSO4 @ 12.5 kg ha–1e0
Outcome
crude proteine0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“crude protein in fodder oats also enhanced with application of 75% RDF + FYM @ 10 t ha–1 + PSB + ZnSO4 @ 12.5 kg ha–1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1060 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude fiber content was highest in untreated controls.

Taxon
Fodder Oatst0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
crude fiber contente0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

e0

“significantly highest crude fiber content was recorded under control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Oats (Avena sativa (L.))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude fiber content was lowest with the specified 75% RDF mixture.

Taxon
Fodder Oatst0
Treatment
75% RDF + FYM @ 10 t ha–1 + PSB + ZnSO4 @ 12.5 kg ha–1e0
Outcome
crude fiber contente1
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“lowest with application of 75% RDF + FYM @ 10 t ha–1 + PSB + ZnSO4 @ 12.5 kg ha–1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1220 · show in text ↑
e1

“crude fiber content was recorded under control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Oats (Avena sativa (L.))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–86 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.