Paper · 2024 · Acta Scientiarum Agronomy

Combining silicon, organic matter, and Trichoderma harzianum to mitigate salt stress in forage sorghum

José Orlando Nunes da Silva; Luiz Filipe dos Santos Silva; Edson Moreira de Abrantes; et al.

8
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Salt stress is a major abiotic factor limiting plant growth worldwide, particularly in arid and semiarid regions where excessive groundwater use in irrigation leads to high salt concentrations. To address this issue, this study investigated the efficacy of silicon, either alone or in combination with Trichoderma harzianum and organic matter, in mitigating salt stress in forage sorghum. The experiment took place in a saline Fluvisol in Parnamirim, a semiarid region of Pernambuco, Brazil, and followed a randomized block design with five treatments and four replicates: sorghum (control); sorghum + Si; sorghum + Si + OM (organic matter); sorghum + Si + T (T. harzianum); and sorghum + Si + T + OM. Sorghum plants were assessed over three cycles (initial cut and two regrowths) from June 2021 to April 2022. The combined treatments of Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM increased plant growth by 42.17, 35.49, and 27.51%, respectively, compared to the control. Similarly, these treatments led to biomass accumulation gains of 39.42, 40.44, and 31.77% in sorghum plants relative to the control. Silicon alone did not yield significant growth or biomass accumulation improvements. The application of silicon in conjunction with T. harzianum and/or organic matter shows promise in enhancing forage sorghum growth under saline stress conditions in semiarid regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si plus organic matter increased sorghum growth by 42.17% versus control.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
Si + OMe1
Outcome
plant growthe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
42.17e1
Comparator
the controle1

Verbatim

e0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM increased plant growth by 42.17, 35.49, and 27.51%, respectively, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si plus T. harzianum increased sorghum growth by 35.49% versus control.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
Si + Te1
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume2symbiont
Outcome
plant growthe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
35.49e1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM increased plant growth by 42.17, 35.49, and 27.51%, respectively, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–960 · show in text ↑
e2

“T (T. harzianum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si, T. harzianum and organic matter increased sorghum growth by 27.51% versus control.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
Si + T + OMe1
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume2symbiont
Outcome
plant growthe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
27.51%e1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“forage sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM increased plant growth by 42.17, 35.49, and 27.51%, respectively, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–960 · show in text ↑
e2

“T (T. harzianum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si plus organic matter increased sorghum biomass accumulation by 39.42% versus control.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume2
Treatment
Si + OMe1
Outcome
biomass accumulatione2
Direction
gainse2
Value
39.42e2
Comparator
the controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined treatments of Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–870 · show in text ↑
e1

“Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–870 · show in text ↑
e2

“these treatments led to biomass accumulation gains of 39.42, 40.44, and 31.77% in sorghum plants relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1093 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si plus T. harzianum increased sorghum biomass accumulation by 40.44% versus control.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
Si + Te0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume2symbiont
Outcome
biomass accumulatione1
Direction
gainse1
Value
40.44e1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–870 · show in text ↑
e1

“these treatments led to biomass accumulation gains of 39.42, 40.44, and 31.77% in sorghum plants relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1093 · show in text ↑
e2

“T (T. harzianum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si, T. harzianum and organic matter increased sorghum biomass accumulation by 31.77% versus control.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
Si + T + OMe0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume2symbiont
Outcome
biomass accumulatione1
Direction
gainse1
Value
31.77%e1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si + OM, Si + T, and Si + T + OM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–870 · show in text ↑
e1

“these treatments led to biomass accumulation gains of 39.42, 40.44, and 31.77% in sorghum plants relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1093 · show in text ↑
e2

“T (T. harzianum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon alone did not significantly improve growth or biomass accumulation.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
Silicon alonee0
Outcome
growth or biomass accumulatione0
Direction
did not yield significante0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silicon alone did not yield significant growth or biomass accumulation improvements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1178 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–590 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider silicon with T. harzianum and/or organic matter promising for forage sorghum growth under salinity.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
silicon in conjunction with T. harzianum and/or organic mattere0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0symbiont
Outcome
enhancing forage sorghum growthe0
Qualifier
under saline stress conditions in semiarid regionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of silicon in conjunction with T. harzianum and/or organic matter shows promise in enhancing forage sorghum growth under saline stress conditions in semiarid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1361 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · growth · SorghumResults differ

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.