Paper · 2024 · BMC Plant Biology

Green iron oxide nanoparticles and magnetic nanobiochar: enhancing tomato performance, phytochemicals, and root-knot nematode resistance

Nashaat N. Mahmoud; Asmaa Khader; Esawy Mahmoud

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Green nanoparticles are considered to be an effective strategy for improving phytochemicals and raising productivity in soil infected by root-knot nematodes. This work aims to understand the characteristics of certain nanomaterials, including non-iron (nFe), green non-iron (GnFe), and green magnetic nanobiochar (GMnB), and the effect of adding them at 3 and 6 mg kg − 1 on phytochemicals and tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum) plant growth in soils infected by root-knot nematodes. Results Spectroscopic characterization of nanomaterials showed that nFe, GnFe, and GMnB contained functional groups (e.g., Fe-O, S-H, C-H, OH, and C = C) and possessed a large surface area. Application of GMB at 6 mg kg − 1 was the most efficient treatment for increasing the phytochemicals of the tomato plant, with a rise of 123.2% in total phenolic, 194.7% in total flavonoids, 89.7% in total carbohydrate, 185.2% in total free amino acids, and 165.1% in total tannin compared to the untreated soil. Tomato plant growth and attributes increased with increasing levels of soil nano-amendment in this investigation. The addition of GnFe 3 and GnFe 6 increased the reduction of root galls of root-knot nematodes by 22.44% and 17.76% compared with nFe 3 and nFe 6 , respectively. The inclusion of the examined soil nano-amendments increased phytochemicals and reduced the total number of root-knot nematodes on tomato plants at varying rates, which played a significant role in enhancing tomato growth. Conclusions In conclusion, treating tomato plants with GnFe or GMnB can be used as a promising green nanomaterial to eliminate root-knot nematodes and increase tomato yield in sandy clay loam soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of GMB at 6 mg kg − 1 raised total phenolic of tomato plants by 123.2% compared with untreated soil.

Treatment
Application of GMB at 6 mg kg − 1e1
Outcome
total phenolice2
Direction
increasinge1
Value
123.2%e2
Comparator
untreated soile3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Application of GMB at 6 mg kg − 1 was the most efficient treatment for increasing the phytochemicals of the tomato plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–810 · show in text ↑
e2

“123.2% in total phenolic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–851 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to the untreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of GMB at 6 mg kg − 1 raised total flavonoids of tomato plants by 194.7% compared with untreated soil.

Treatment
Application of GMB at 6 mg kg − 1e1
Outcome
total flavonoidse2
Direction
increasinge1
Value
194.7%e2
Comparator
untreated soile3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Application of GMB at 6 mg kg − 1 was the most efficient treatment for increasing the phytochemicals of the tomato plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–810 · show in text ↑
e2

“194.7% in total flavonoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–879 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to the untreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of GMB at 6 mg kg − 1 raised total carbohydrate of tomato plants by 89.7% compared with untreated soil.

Treatment
Application of GMB at 6 mg kg − 1e1
Outcome
total carbohydratee2
Direction
increasinge1
Value
89.7%e2
Comparator
untreated soile3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Application of GMB at 6 mg kg − 1 was the most efficient treatment for increasing the phytochemicals of the tomato plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–810 · show in text ↑
e2

“89.7% in total carbohydrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–908 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to the untreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of GMB at 6 mg kg − 1 raised total free amino acids of tomato plants by 185.2% compared with untreated soil.

Treatment
Application of GMB at 6 mg kg − 1e1
Outcome
total free amino acidse2
Direction
increasinge1
Value
185.2%e2
Comparator
untreated soile3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Application of GMB at 6 mg kg − 1 was the most efficient treatment for increasing the phytochemicals of the tomato plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–810 · show in text ↑
e2

“185.2% in total free amino acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–942 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to the untreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of GMB at 6 mg kg − 1 raised total tannin of tomato plants by 165.1% compared with untreated soil.

Treatment
Application of GMB at 6 mg kg − 1e1
Outcome
total tannine2
Direction
increasinge1
Value
165.1%e2
Comparator
untreated soile3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Application of GMB at 6 mg kg − 1 was the most efficient treatment for increasing the phytochemicals of the tomato plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–810 · show in text ↑
e2

“165.1% in total tannin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–970 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to the untreated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato plant growth and attributes increased with increasing levels of soil nano-amendment.

Treatment
soil nano-amendmente1
Outcome
plant growth and attributese1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Tomato plant growth and attributes increased with increasing levels of soil nano-amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1093 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding GnFe 3 increased the reduction of root galls of root-knot nematodes by 22.44% compared with nFe 3.

Treatment
addition of GnFe 3e1
Interactor
root-knot nematodesMeloidogynee1pathogen
Outcome
reduction of root galls of root-knot nematodese1
Direction
increasede1
Value
22.44%e1
Comparator
nFe 3e1

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The addition of GnFe 3 and GnFe 6 increased the reduction of root galls of root-knot nematodes by 22.44% and 17.76% compared with nFe 3 and nFe 6 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding GnFe 6 increased the reduction of root galls of root-knot nematodes by 17.76% compared with nFe 6.

Treatment
GnFe 6e1
Interactor
root-knot nematodesMeloidogynee1pathogen
Outcome
reduction of root galls of root-knot nematodese1
Direction
increasede1
Value
17.76%e1
Comparator
nFe 6e1

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The addition of GnFe 3 and GnFe 6 increased the reduction of root galls of root-knot nematodes by 22.44% and 17.76% compared with nFe 3 and nFe 6 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soil nano-amendments reduced the total number of root-knot nematodes on tomato plants at varying rates.

Treatment
soil nano-amendmentse1
Interactor
root-knot nematodesMeloidogynee1pathogen
Outcome
total number of root-knot nematodese1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The inclusion of the examined soil nano-amendments increased phytochemicals and reduced the total number of root-knot nematodes on tomato plants at varying rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1440 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that treating tomato plants with GnFe or GMnB can serve as a promising green nanomaterial to eliminate root-knot nematodes and increase tomato yield in sandy clay loam soil.

Treatment
GnFe or GMnBe1
Interactor
root-knot nematodesMeloidogynee1pathogen
Outcome
eliminate root-knot nematodes and increase tomato yielde1
Setting
sandy clay loam soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“treating tomato plants with GnFe or GMnB can be used as a promising green nanomaterial to eliminate root-knot nematodes and increase tomato yield in sandy clay loam soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1698 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 94 positive, 6 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

nanoparticle · Meloidogyne · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.