Paper · 2023 · Genetičnì resursi roslin

Recombination peculiarities of valuable traits in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)

О.V. Dubchak

13
claims
34
verbatim quotes
2
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Aim. To study peculiarities of recombination of economically valuable traits in initial sugar beet sources in order to derive from them МS-hybrids with increased yields and tolerance to stressful environments. Results and Discussion. Results of 2015-2022 studies are presented. Temperature and precipitation amount during the growth sugar beet plants were characterized by wide fluctuations in comparison with the long-term averages and influenced the performance. Breeding materials differed in morphological characteristics, biological capacities, qualitative parameters, have various levels of resistance to adverse environmental factors. Under water deficit, new experimental accessions of polyspermous pollinators (PР) - candidates for male components of test hybrids were originated. Valuable sources of performance – female components of monospermous CМS-based hybrids were created. CMS components, which were distinguished as a result of the first cycle of crossings, yielded more roots (56.5 – 58.1 t/hа) than initial forms or the group standard (55.4 t/ha). The sugar content ranged 18.73% to 19.28 % (18.58 % in the standard). Conclusions. At increased air temperature during the sugar beet growth, we selected PР accessions, which gave great yields of seeds and roots. 556-PР4, 558-PР5, 563-PР6, 560-PР7 were the best new pollinators in terms of performance, because they yielded more than the standard (45.3 – 49.6 t/hа vs. 38.4 t/hа, respectively) under water deficit during crucial periods of the growth and development. The sugar content in beetroots was 19.51 – 20.21%, (19.44% in the standard); the sugar collection varied from 9.1 t/ha to 10.0 t/hа (7.4 t/hа in the standard). The following peculiarities were recorded in the selected offspring: increased resistance to droughts and diseases and good storability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature and precipitation fluctuated widely against long-term averages during the growth of sugar beet and influenced performance.

Treatment
Temperature and precipitation amount during the growthe1
Outcome
performancee1
Qualifier
wide fluctuations in comparison with the long-term averagese1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“Temperature and precipitation amount during the growth sugar beet plants were characterized by wide fluctuations in comparison with the long-term averages and influenced the performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–463 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Breeding materials differed in morphological characteristics, biological capacities and qualitative parameters.

Outcome
morphological characteristics, biological capacities, qualitative parameterse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑
e2

“Breeding materials differed in morphological characteristics, biological capacities, qualitative parameters, have various levels of resistance to adverse environmental factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–640 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Breeding materials have various levels of resistance to adverse environmental factors.

Outcome
resistance to adverse environmental factorse2
Qualifier
various levelse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑
e2

“Breeding materials differed in morphological characteristics, biological capacities, qualitative parameters, have various levels of resistance to adverse environmental factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–640 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water deficit, new experimental accessions of polyspermous pollinators were originated.

Material
polyspermous pollinatorse3
Treatment
Under water deficite3
Outcome
new experimental accessionse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑
e3

“Under water deficit, new experimental accessions of polyspermous pollinators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–718 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Valuable sources of performance were created as female components of monospermous CMS-based hybrids.

Material
female components of monospermouse5
Outcome
Valuable sources of performancee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑
e4

“Valuable sources of performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–821 · show in text ↑
e5

“female components of monospermous”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–857 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CMS components yielded more roots than initial forms or the group standard, at 56.5 – 58.1 against 55.4 t/ha.

Material
CMS componentse0
Outcome
rootse0
Direction
yielded moree0
Value
56.5 – 58.1e1
Qualifier
55.4 t/hae3
Comparator
initial forms or the group standarde2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“CMS components, which were distinguished as a result of the first cycle of crossings, yielded more roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–994 · show in text ↑
e1

“yielded more roots (56.5 – 58.1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1007 · show in text ↑
e2

“than initial forms or the group standard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1054 · show in text ↑
e3

“the group standard (55.4 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1066 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar content ranged from 18.73% to 19.28%, against 18.58% in the standard.

Outcome
sugar contente0
Value
18.73% to 19.28e0
Qualifier
18.58 %e1
Comparator
standarde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“The sugar content ranged 18.73% to 19.28”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1108 · show in text ↑
e1

“(18.58 % in the standard)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four pollinator accessions yielded more than the standard under water deficit (45.3 – 49.6).

Material
best new pollinatorse0
Treatment
under water deficite1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
45.3 – 49.6e0
Comparator
standarde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“were the best new pollinators in terms of performance, because they yielded more than the standard (45.3 – 49.6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1427 · show in text ↑
e1

“under water deficit during crucial periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1504 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar content in beetroots was 19.51 – 20.21%, against 19.44% in the standard.

Outcome
sugar content in beetrootse0
Value
19.51 – 20.21%e0
Qualifier
19.44%e1
Comparator
standarde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“The sugar content in beetroots was 19.51 – 20.21%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1585 · show in text ↑
e1

“(19.44% in the standard)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1587–1611 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar collection varied from 9.1 t/ha to 10.0 t/ha.

Outcome
sugar collectione0
Value
9.1 t/ha to 10.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“the sugar collection varied from 9.1 t/ha to 10.0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1662 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The selected offspring showed increased resistance to droughts and diseases.

Outcome
resistance to droughts and diseasese0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“increased resistance to droughts and diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1765–1810 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The selected offspring had good storability.

Outcome
storabilitye0
Qualifier
goode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“good storability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1815–1831 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At increased air temperature, the selected accessions gave great yields of seeds and roots.

Treatment
increased air temperaturee0
Outcome
yields of seeds and rootse1
Qualifier
greate1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“At increased air temperature during the sugar beet growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1208 · show in text ↑
e1

“which gave great yields of seeds and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1279 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

32 papers: 6 positive, 26 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.