Abstract
Aim. To study peculiarities of recombination of economically valuable traits in initial sugar beet sources in order to derive from them МS-hybrids with increased yields and tolerance to stressful environments. Results and Discussion. Results of 2015-2022 studies are presented. Temperature and precipitation amount during the growth sugar beet plants were characterized by wide fluctuations in comparison with the long-term averages and influenced the performance. Breeding materials differed in morphological characteristics, biological capacities, qualitative parameters, have various levels of resistance to adverse environmental factors. Under water deficit, new experimental accessions of polyspermous pollinators (PР) - candidates for male components of test hybrids were originated. Valuable sources of performance – female components of monospermous CМS-based hybrids were created. CMS components, which were distinguished as a result of the first cycle of crossings, yielded more roots (56.5 – 58.1 t/hа) than initial forms or the group standard (55.4 t/ha). The sugar content ranged 18.73% to 19.28 % (18.58 % in the standard). Conclusions. At increased air temperature during the sugar beet growth, we selected PР accessions, which gave great yields of seeds and roots. 556-PР4, 558-PР5, 563-PР6, 560-PР7 were the best new pollinators in terms of performance, because they yielded more than the standard (45.3 – 49.6 t/hа vs. 38.4 t/hа, respectively) under water deficit during crucial periods of the growth and development. The sugar content in beetroots was 19.51 – 20.21%, (19.44% in the standard); the sugar collection varied from 9.1 t/ha to 10.0 t/hа (7.4 t/hа in the standard). The following peculiarities were recorded in the selected offspring: increased resistance to droughts and diseases and good storability.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Temperature and precipitation fluctuated widely against long-term averages during the growth of sugar beet and influenced performance.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- Temperature and precipitation amount during the growthe1
- Outcome
- performancee1
- Qualifier
- wide fluctuations in comparison with the long-term averagese1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“sugar beet”
e1“Temperature and precipitation amount during the growth sugar beet plants were characterized by wide fluctuations in comparison with the long-term averages and influenced the performance”
Claim · model-written summary
Breeding materials differed in morphological characteristics, biological capacities and qualitative parameters.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Outcome
- morphological characteristics, biological capacities, qualitative parameterse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“sugar beet”
e2“Breeding materials differed in morphological characteristics, biological capacities, qualitative parameters, have various levels of resistance to adverse environmental factors”
Claim · model-written summary
Breeding materials have various levels of resistance to adverse environmental factors.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Outcome
- resistance to adverse environmental factorse2
- Qualifier
- various levelse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“sugar beet”
e2“Breeding materials differed in morphological characteristics, biological capacities, qualitative parameters, have various levels of resistance to adverse environmental factors”
Claim · model-written summary
Under water deficit, new experimental accessions of polyspermous pollinators were originated.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Material
- polyspermous pollinatorse3
- Treatment
- Under water deficite3
- Outcome
- new experimental accessionse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“sugar beet”
e3“Under water deficit, new experimental accessions of polyspermous pollinators”
Claim · model-written summary
Valuable sources of performance were created as female components of monospermous CMS-based hybrids.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Material
- female components of monospermouse5
- Outcome
- Valuable sources of performancee4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“sugar beet”
e4“Valuable sources of performance”
e5“female components of monospermous”
Claim · model-written summary
CMS components yielded more roots than initial forms or the group standard, at 56.5 – 58.1 against 55.4 t/ha.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Material
- CMS componentse0
- Outcome
- rootse0
- Direction
- yielded moree0
- Value
- 56.5 – 58.1e1
- Qualifier
- 55.4 t/hae3
- Comparator
- initial forms or the group standarde2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“sugar beet”
e0“CMS components, which were distinguished as a result of the first cycle of crossings, yielded more roots”
e1“yielded more roots (56.5 – 58.1”
e2“than initial forms or the group standard”
e3“the group standard (55.4 t/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugar content ranged from 18.73% to 19.28%, against 18.58% in the standard.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Outcome
- sugar contente0
- Value
- 18.73% to 19.28e0
- Qualifier
- 18.58 %e1
- Comparator
- standarde1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“sugar beet”
e0“The sugar content ranged 18.73% to 19.28”
e1“(18.58 % in the standard)”
Claim · model-written summary
Four pollinator accessions yielded more than the standard under water deficit (45.3 – 49.6).
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Material
- best new pollinatorse0
- Treatment
- under water deficite1
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 45.3 – 49.6e0
- Comparator
- standarde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“sugar beet”
e0“were the best new pollinators in terms of performance, because they yielded more than the standard (45.3 – 49.6”
e1“under water deficit during crucial periods”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugar content in beetroots was 19.51 – 20.21%, against 19.44% in the standard.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Outcome
- sugar content in beetrootse0
- Value
- 19.51 – 20.21%e0
- Qualifier
- 19.44%e1
- Comparator
- standarde1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“sugar beet”
e0“The sugar content in beetroots was 19.51 – 20.21%”
e1“(19.44% in the standard)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugar collection varied from 9.1 t/ha to 10.0 t/ha.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Outcome
- sugar collectione0
- Value
- 9.1 t/ha to 10.0e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“sugar beet”
e0“the sugar collection varied from 9.1 t/ha to 10.0”
Claim · model-written summary
The selected offspring showed increased resistance to droughts and diseases.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Outcome
- resistance to droughts and diseasese0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“sugar beet”
e0“increased resistance to droughts and diseases”
Claim · model-written summary
The selected offspring had good storability.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Outcome
- storabilitye0
- Qualifier
- goode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“sugar beet”
e0“good storability”
Claim · model-written summary
At increased air temperature, the selected accessions gave great yields of seeds and roots.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- increased air temperaturee0
- Outcome
- yields of seeds and rootse1
- Qualifier
- greate1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“sugar beet”
e0“At increased air temperature during the sugar beet growth”
e1“which gave great yields of seeds and roots”
The same questions in other papers
drought · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
28 papers more in this group
See all 32 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.